- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
WarCamEagle88
| Favorite team: | Auburn |
| Location: | NC |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 293 |
| Registered on: | 2/1/2018 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Best Whitetail States For Non-Residents
Posted by WarCamEagle88 on 11/10/25 at 1:52 pm to BentonTiger7
It would be a long trip for you, but Pennsylvania has the highest density of deer in the country, and the out of state license is less than $150
re: Best white oak acorn crop in years
Posted by WarCamEagle88 on 11/10/25 at 1:48 pm to Tigerpaw123
We had a very dry summer, which I believe is the reason why there are no acorns or apples where I hunt. Didn’t see many deer this October like we normally would. Hoping it’ll be better next year.
re: Came here to melt…
Posted by WarCamEagle88 on 11/1/25 at 10:12 pm to LanierSpots
I feel like I’ve been pretty patient until tonight. “Let him get his system and players first” “It’s a tough conference, they’ll gel next year” “Bad time, other big schools looking for a coach” “We’re still paying Gus and Harsin, we can’t pay Hugh’s buyout and still afford a good coach”
But the dam broke tonight. 3 points, again? “Offensive guru” my arse. He had his chance and failed miserably, GTFO.
But the dam broke tonight. 3 points, again? “Offensive guru” my arse. He had his chance and failed miserably, GTFO.
Came here to melt…
Posted by WarCamEagle88 on 11/1/25 at 10:05 pm
But I see you all beat me to it.
Carry on.
Carry on.
re: Should some parishes in Louisiana adopt Antler restrictions?
Posted by WarCamEagle88 on 10/23/25 at 8:46 pm to White Bear
quote:
To the PA rules, seems the limit of one buck per season would do more towards growing older bucks than an antler restriction would.
That was not my experience. It’s always been 1 buck per year as long as I’ve hunted there. With 1 million hunters in the state, there was a lot of competition so people shot the first buck they saw.
Also, until fairly recently, the season was buck-only the first week of rifle season, and the 2nd week was buck and doe. Seems like most people hunted the first week only (or just the opening weekend and Monday) and shot anything with antlers. Big bucks became so rare that there was no shame in killing a little one.
re: Should some parishes in Louisiana adopt Antler restrictions?
Posted by WarCamEagle88 on 10/23/25 at 8:39 am to turnpiketiger
My family has land in Pennsylvania, and I’ve hunted there every year for 25 years. When I was a kid, you hardly ever saw bucks, much less a mature one. PA has around 1 million deer hunters every year, so all the small bucks got shot. Killing a mature buck was like winning the lottery.
About 10 years ago, the state put in an antler restriction, 3 points on one side (except for youth hunters). Now we see mature bucks like never before. 10-pointers and better all over the place.
This radical change in the number and quality of bucks has made me a believer in antler restrictions. If you want meat, shoot doe. If you want antlers to hang, there are many more bucks to choose from now. If you don’t care about the antlers, you can still shoot a 5-point and be legal.
The antler restrictions incentivize the meat hunters to shoot doe, which improves the overall herd health, while also leaving more bucks to get big. It’s a win-win for everyone.
Another factor I have not seen mentioned yet is the potential for the state to make more money off out-of-state hunters. Big bucks bring in more hunters, which means more money for the state to use to improve public land and purchase more land to be used for public hunting. Out-of-state hunters also bring in more money for the local economy. Hotels, restaurants, bars, grocery stores, sporting goods stores, etc. all get more money from guys who come in for the week to hunt big bucks. Those guys also shoot doe, improving the herd health.
Although, I do understand the “don’t tread on me, keep the state out of my business and let me shoot what I want” perspective too. But I like what I see in PA and support it.
About 10 years ago, the state put in an antler restriction, 3 points on one side (except for youth hunters). Now we see mature bucks like never before. 10-pointers and better all over the place.
This radical change in the number and quality of bucks has made me a believer in antler restrictions. If you want meat, shoot doe. If you want antlers to hang, there are many more bucks to choose from now. If you don’t care about the antlers, you can still shoot a 5-point and be legal.
The antler restrictions incentivize the meat hunters to shoot doe, which improves the overall herd health, while also leaving more bucks to get big. It’s a win-win for everyone.
Another factor I have not seen mentioned yet is the potential for the state to make more money off out-of-state hunters. Big bucks bring in more hunters, which means more money for the state to use to improve public land and purchase more land to be used for public hunting. Out-of-state hunters also bring in more money for the local economy. Hotels, restaurants, bars, grocery stores, sporting goods stores, etc. all get more money from guys who come in for the week to hunt big bucks. Those guys also shoot doe, improving the herd health.
Although, I do understand the “don’t tread on me, keep the state out of my business and let me shoot what I want” perspective too. But I like what I see in PA and support it.
re: Gifted some heirloom 12-gauges
Posted by WarCamEagle88 on 10/15/25 at 7:21 am to tiggerfan02 2021
quote:
don't start sanding or trying to do anything to the finish other than cleaning/oiling until you get a competent gunsmith to evaluate what needs to be done (if anything) to the finish.
Good idea, thank you
re: Anyone have an encounter with a Fisher Cat?
Posted by WarCamEagle88 on 10/15/25 at 7:18 am to JacieNY
I saw one while archery hunting in PA a few years ago. I thought it was a cat at first until I realized the tail was too long to be a cat. Picked him up on a trail cam the following summer and got a good look at him. Big damn weasel.
Apparently the state started releasing them a few decades ago. They’re the only predator of porcupines and the state wanted to reduce the population due to the damage they cause to peoples cabins. Cool to know they’re around.
Apparently the state started releasing them a few decades ago. They’re the only predator of porcupines and the state wanted to reduce the population due to the damage they cause to peoples cabins. Cool to know they’re around.
re: Gifted some heirloom 12-gauges
Posted by WarCamEagle88 on 10/14/25 at 4:32 pm to AwgustaDawg
quote:
It really is about as "personal" as possessions get for men...tools are great and guns are tools but there is something very special about shooting a firearm one of your ancestors used to sustain themselves or defend their property with.
Agreed, very special. Especially when those ancestors were men of high character, grit, and so many other qualities.
It’s easy to almost forget someone in your family who died when you were a baby, or before you were born. Having physical objects they used and cherished helps keep them at the forefront of your memory. Your role models don’t have to be alive, you just need to remember them often enough to help you stay on the right path.
re: Gifted some heirloom 12-gauges
Posted by WarCamEagle88 on 10/14/25 at 4:18 pm to NorCali
quote:
Sorry if you already know this, but don’t shoot steel shot through them or barrel bulge potential. But you absolutely should use them to appreciate how well the mechanisms work
Thank you, I had no idea.
Gifted some heirloom 12-gauges
Posted by WarCamEagle88 on 10/14/25 at 8:30 am
I was given some cool family heirlooms this weekend, Winchester Model 97s. They were my Great Grandfather's, and are the only heirlooms I have from him, making them even more special to me.
One is the standard 28in barrel “Field” model, made in 1923.
The other is the “Riot” model, with a 20in barrel, made in 1941.
They are both pump action with a hammer, which I’ve never seen before. Apparently this model was made infamous in the trenches of WWI due to their “slam fire” capability.
Both are in surprisingly good shape for their age. Just a touch of rust I can buff out.
Feels great to have such cool pieces of history from a family member who I never really got to meet. Happy I’ll be able to hand them down to my son one day too.
Folks, don’t sell your guns. Your decedents may thank you in 100 years.
One is the standard 28in barrel “Field” model, made in 1923.
The other is the “Riot” model, with a 20in barrel, made in 1941.
They are both pump action with a hammer, which I’ve never seen before. Apparently this model was made infamous in the trenches of WWI due to their “slam fire” capability.
Both are in surprisingly good shape for their age. Just a touch of rust I can buff out.
Feels great to have such cool pieces of history from a family member who I never really got to meet. Happy I’ll be able to hand them down to my son one day too.
Folks, don’t sell your guns. Your decedents may thank you in 100 years.
re: Favorite Hunting Quotes
Posted by WarCamEagle88 on 10/5/25 at 8:13 am to HogBalls
quote:
“You can’t eat them horns”
My great uncle always said “you can boil them antlers all day, still can’t make soup”
re: Top shelf high school football - McCallie vs. Baylor in TN
Posted by WarCamEagle88 on 10/2/25 at 2:11 pm to thatthang
quote:
If my parents hated me so much that they sent me to boarding school like this poster, I would probably also have complexes that made me this unhinged and bitchy about unimportant high school shite.
I didn’t go to McCallie (or any boarding/private school), but I know kids that do. I also know a lot of kids that go to other private schools and to public schools, and the McCallie kids are more well rounded and likable in my estimation. Seeing adults shite on kids over a hype video they made is what made me speak up.
Maybe the adults talking shite about children are the unhinged, bitchy ones. But I guess you support that kind of thing. What’s that say about you?
re: Top shelf high school football - McCallie vs. Baylor in TN
Posted by WarCamEagle88 on 10/2/25 at 8:19 am to RoyalAir
quote:
The McCallie entitlement in this city is astounding. They're all gold-plated assholes.
It’s called having high standards, sweetie. Maybe you should try it sometime.
I know a bunch of McCallie kids and every one of them is intelligent, polite, and hard working.
And then there’s you and your ilk, who talk shite about children on the internet.
There’s an old saying: “if everywhere you go people are assholes, YOU’RE the a-hole.”
re: Top shelf high school football - McCallie vs. Baylor in TN
Posted by WarCamEagle88 on 10/2/25 at 8:13 am to anc
A bunch of grown men criticizing high school kids trying to have fun with their rivalry week. What a damn shame. You should be embarrassed.
These are the top 2 teams in the state, who happen to be in the same city. It’s a big deal to these kids. And here come the boo birds, shitting on literal children trying to have fun and make something creative with a high production value.
I’m sure you knuckle-draggers could make a better video than what these kids did, right?
Is this going to win a Grammy, go viral, or top the charts? Of course not. But it’s better than anything I could make, and better than anything my high school even thought about trying to make.
I give them credit for trying to do something hard and having the balls to put it out into the world. I give them credit for having school spirit in an era when loyalty to your school and team is at an all-time low.
These are the top 2 teams in the state, who happen to be in the same city. It’s a big deal to these kids. And here come the boo birds, shitting on literal children trying to have fun and make something creative with a high production value.
I’m sure you knuckle-draggers could make a better video than what these kids did, right?
Is this going to win a Grammy, go viral, or top the charts? Of course not. But it’s better than anything I could make, and better than anything my high school even thought about trying to make.
I give them credit for trying to do something hard and having the balls to put it out into the world. I give them credit for having school spirit in an era when loyalty to your school and team is at an all-time low.
re: I’m not saying it WAS a conspiracy, but…
Posted by WarCamEagle88 on 9/22/25 at 6:44 pm to TemperdTiger
quote:
Let's be honest, the SEC office wants the Red River Shootout to be a bigger game,
Excellent point. The 2 golden boy QBs facing off with playoffs on the line. The script writes itself. Sickening
re: I’m not saying it WAS a conspiracy, but…
Posted by WarCamEagle88 on 9/21/25 at 9:12 am to Jyrdis
quote:
Mateer didn’t look Heisman worthy in that game. He looked like an average QB.
I don’t think that will matter in the long run. The hype train will continue to roll. Viewership will continue to increase. Advertising dollars will balloon. The money makers have picked their pony, it would seem.
re: I’m not saying it WAS a conspiracy, but…
Posted by WarCamEagle88 on 9/21/25 at 8:53 am to FearlessFreep
quote:
SEC officials are historically incompetent and have been for decades no further explanation necessary
Maybe this type of coordination isn’t new. The league benefits from the Heisman hype train and increased viewership as much as the other moneymakers. It would appear they have picked their pony and will go to great lengths to prop him up to ensure the money keeps rolling in.
re: I’m not saying it WAS a conspiracy, but…
Posted by WarCamEagle88 on 9/21/25 at 8:49 am to Placekicker
quote:
But, how does that explain JA holding onto the ball so long, taking sacks when he had open receivers to throw to?
It doesn’t. I agree, the team may have overcome the referees if they had avoided all those mistakes. But the outcome of the game is supposed to be based on the players and the coaching only, and NOT the refs. And the outcome of this game was absolutely influenced by the refs’ incompetence and/or bias on countless occasions.
Why even play the game if the outcome isn’t 100% (or at least 99%) based on play and coaching? I can tolerate some mistakes from the refs; they’re human. This game appeared to be beyond normal human error and moved into the realm of purposeful influence. It defeats the entire purpose of competition.
I’m not saying it WAS a conspiracy, but…
Posted by WarCamEagle88 on 9/21/25 at 8:15 am
I think there is enough evidence to think it’s certainly possible.
Hear me out.
The Arch Manning Heisman hype train during preseason died quickly when he was exposed as an average QB. The media/advertisers/networks need someone to fill the void to keep the money/viewership rolling. Here comes Mateer, the new Golden Boy Heisman front runner. The money makers don’t want to see him lose at home to a team like Auburn. They need him winning to keep the hype train rolling.
The amount of horrifically bad/missed calls by the refs the entire game seemed all too coincidental. Their incompetence made a huge difference in the final score.
Auburn absolutely shot themselves in the foot a ton, so they certainly share the blame. 10 sacks given up, holding the ball too long, all those penalties by the O-line, etc. But despite all those mistakes, we were still in the game until the end. The terrible referees were the difference maker.
I think it’s within the realm of possibility that there was a coordinated effort to help the Sooners. When there is millions of dollars on the line, you can’t be surprised when powerful people coordinate to get the outcome they prefer.
But there is nothing that can be done about it now. On to the next one.
Hear me out.
The Arch Manning Heisman hype train during preseason died quickly when he was exposed as an average QB. The media/advertisers/networks need someone to fill the void to keep the money/viewership rolling. Here comes Mateer, the new Golden Boy Heisman front runner. The money makers don’t want to see him lose at home to a team like Auburn. They need him winning to keep the hype train rolling.
The amount of horrifically bad/missed calls by the refs the entire game seemed all too coincidental. Their incompetence made a huge difference in the final score.
Auburn absolutely shot themselves in the foot a ton, so they certainly share the blame. 10 sacks given up, holding the ball too long, all those penalties by the O-line, etc. But despite all those mistakes, we were still in the game until the end. The terrible referees were the difference maker.
I think it’s within the realm of possibility that there was a coordinated effort to help the Sooners. When there is millions of dollars on the line, you can’t be surprised when powerful people coordinate to get the outcome they prefer.
But there is nothing that can be done about it now. On to the next one.
Popular
2












