- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
polishlion
| Favorite team: | Arkansas State  |
| Location: | Arkansas |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 12 |
| Registered on: | 5/14/2017 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Why are dot on the forehead Indians so unathletic?
Posted by polishlion on 12/20/17 at 6:46 am to polishlion
The study also found that lower fitness levels among South Asian men could not be explained simply by lower activity levels. The South Asian men had lower fitness levels than white men at all levels of physical activity, which suggests natural differences in body makeup, the researchers said
LINK
"In particular, there is accumulating evidence that South Asians may have a 'low fitness' phenotype which contributes to their elevated cardio-metabolic risk, and thus may particularly benefit from undertaking higher levels of physical activity [14]"
LINK
In South Asians, a unique obesity phenotype of high abdominal fat is associated with increased cardiovascular risk
LINK
Studies in the South Asian diaspora residing in the U.K. during the early 1980s suggested the possibility of an Asian Indian or South Asian phenotype (Fig. 1). This term refers to a combination of characteristics that predisposes SA to the development of insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.
LINK
Mean hand grip strength (HGS)
dutch men is 143.5
moroccan 141.1
turkish 137.2
African surinamese 137
ghanian 124.1
Indian/ south asian surinamese 121.6
LINK
LINK
"In particular, there is accumulating evidence that South Asians may have a 'low fitness' phenotype which contributes to their elevated cardio-metabolic risk, and thus may particularly benefit from undertaking higher levels of physical activity [14]"
LINK
In South Asians, a unique obesity phenotype of high abdominal fat is associated with increased cardiovascular risk
LINK
Studies in the South Asian diaspora residing in the U.K. during the early 1980s suggested the possibility of an Asian Indian or South Asian phenotype (Fig. 1). This term refers to a combination of characteristics that predisposes SA to the development of insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.
LINK
Mean hand grip strength (HGS)
dutch men is 143.5
moroccan 141.1
turkish 137.2
African surinamese 137
ghanian 124.1
Indian/ south asian surinamese 121.6
LINK
1
re: Why are dot on the forehead Indians so unathletic?
Posted by polishlion on 12/17/17 at 6:09 am to 1BamaRTR
Pajeet my son, north indians just wished they were white. to non indians you guys look the same.
Whenever there is a thread talking about indians, north indians are the first to throw their southern brethren under bus. That is a cuck move. Indians are more racist to each other than anyone else is to them.
Whenever there is a thread talking about indians, north indians are the first to throw their southern brethren under bus. That is a cuck move. Indians are more racist to each other than anyone else is to them.
re: Why are dot on the forehead Indians so unathletic?
Posted by polishlion on 12/16/17 at 11:17 pm to Webster23
re: Why are dot on the forehead Indians so unathletic?
Posted by polishlion on 12/16/17 at 9:59 pm to polishlion
The lung capacity of Indians is 30 per cent lower than North Americans or Europeans or Chinese, making them highly vulnerable to diabetes, heart attacks or strokes, says a top scientist.
LINK
"Asian Indians had more fat, both total and in the abdominal region, with less lean mass, skeletal muscle and bone mineral than all other ethnic groups"
Body size, body composition and fat distribution: comparative analysis of European, Maori, Pacific Island and Asian Indian adults.
LINK
The lung capacity of Indians is 30 per cent lower than North Americans or Europeans or Chinese, making them highly vulnerable to diabetes, heart attacks or strokes, says a top scientist.
LINK
At any given body fat mass value, South Asians had significantly less lean mass than each of the three other groups after adjustment for age, height, humerus breadth, smoking status, physical activity, and diet. Aboriginal, Chinese, and European men had 3.42 kg [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.55–5.29], 3.01 kg (95% CI = 1.33–4.70), and 3.57 kg (95% CI = 1.82–5.33) more lean mass than South Asian men at a given total fat mass, respectively"
Ethnic Variation in Fat and Lean Body Mass and the Association with Insulin Resistance
LINK
LINK
"Asian Indians had more fat, both total and in the abdominal region, with less lean mass, skeletal muscle and bone mineral than all other ethnic groups"
Body size, body composition and fat distribution: comparative analysis of European, Maori, Pacific Island and Asian Indian adults.
LINK
The lung capacity of Indians is 30 per cent lower than North Americans or Europeans or Chinese, making them highly vulnerable to diabetes, heart attacks or strokes, says a top scientist.
LINK
At any given body fat mass value, South Asians had significantly less lean mass than each of the three other groups after adjustment for age, height, humerus breadth, smoking status, physical activity, and diet. Aboriginal, Chinese, and European men had 3.42 kg [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.55–5.29], 3.01 kg (95% CI = 1.33–4.70), and 3.57 kg (95% CI = 1.82–5.33) more lean mass than South Asian men at a given total fat mass, respectively"
Ethnic Variation in Fat and Lean Body Mass and the Association with Insulin Resistance
LINK
re: Why are dot on the forehead Indians so unathletic?
Posted by polishlion on 5/14/17 at 11:43 pm to WeOnlyHateMancs
All my sources were peer reviewed studies. Don't know how that is ignorant. You can read the studies yourself. If you disagree with the fact that indians are at a physical disadvantage please provide some peer reviewed studies to refute my assertions
re: Why are dot on the forehead Indians so unathletic?
Posted by polishlion on 5/14/17 at 10:26 pm to toosleaux
Its genetics and supported by science
Mean lean muscle mass (kg)
black males = 65.6kg
White males = 62 kg
Hispanic males = 59.9 kg
Asian males = 59.6 kg
Indian males = 53.3 kg
LINK
"The researchers found that South Asian men had at least 3 kg less of skeletal muscle than Chinese and European men. South Asian women also had less muscle mass than their counterparts of other ethnicities — by at least 2 kg."
LINK
Asian Indians tend to have more abdominal adipose tissue, less lean body mass (LBM) and higher magnitude of insulin resistance (IR) despite falling in the normal range of body mass index (BMI) [1]. The high value of waist hip ratio in Asian Indians may be due to less lean mass of the hips and greater fat at the levels of waist [2]. Another study showed that Asian Indian men have low muscle mass and 30% more total body fat (BF) than other ethnic groups [3]. Low lean mass is also evident in Asian Indian neonates as compared to white Caucasian neonates [4].
LINK
Indians have 30% weaker lungs than Europeans: Study
LINK
South asians (INDIANS) have the weakest grip strength of all people
HGS values differed among individuals from different geographic regions. HGS values were highest among those from Europe/North America, lowest among those from South Asia, South East Asia and Africa, and intermediate among those from China, South America, and the Middle East. Reference ranges stratified by geographic region, age, and sex are presented. These ranges varied from a median (25th–75th percentile) 50?kg (43–56?kg) in men <40?years from Europe/North America to 18?kg (14–20?kg) in women >60?years from South East Asia. Reference ranges by ethnicity and body-mass index are also reported.
LINK
Mean lean muscle mass (kg)
black males = 65.6kg
White males = 62 kg
Hispanic males = 59.9 kg
Asian males = 59.6 kg
Indian males = 53.3 kg
LINK
"The researchers found that South Asian men had at least 3 kg less of skeletal muscle than Chinese and European men. South Asian women also had less muscle mass than their counterparts of other ethnicities — by at least 2 kg."
LINK
Asian Indians tend to have more abdominal adipose tissue, less lean body mass (LBM) and higher magnitude of insulin resistance (IR) despite falling in the normal range of body mass index (BMI) [1]. The high value of waist hip ratio in Asian Indians may be due to less lean mass of the hips and greater fat at the levels of waist [2]. Another study showed that Asian Indian men have low muscle mass and 30% more total body fat (BF) than other ethnic groups [3]. Low lean mass is also evident in Asian Indian neonates as compared to white Caucasian neonates [4].
LINK
Indians have 30% weaker lungs than Europeans: Study
LINK
South asians (INDIANS) have the weakest grip strength of all people
HGS values differed among individuals from different geographic regions. HGS values were highest among those from Europe/North America, lowest among those from South Asia, South East Asia and Africa, and intermediate among those from China, South America, and the Middle East. Reference ranges stratified by geographic region, age, and sex are presented. These ranges varied from a median (25th–75th percentile) 50?kg (43–56?kg) in men <40?years from Europe/North America to 18?kg (14–20?kg) in women >60?years from South East Asia. Reference ranges by ethnicity and body-mass index are also reported.
LINK
Popular
39
