PIPEKING

quote:

---

Not to be rude, but your team is in no way shape or form a match for LSU if they were coached by competent offensive minded coaches.

---

I've watched the game twice now and I failed to find even one position on the field that Wisconsin didn't match up... including RB.

PLEASE STOP WITH THE INFERIOR UW TALENT BIT.

UW's CBs Tindal and Sheldon held your "NFL" receivers in check all day, and when they were open they dropped a lot of passes. So did ours, but I saw our "lowly" UW receivers came uncovered quite a few times.

Your all everything RBs put up the same numbers as our "inferior" RB group. Fornette is a stud, but Clement is not that far behind.

Our O-line which, BTW, will all be NFL caliber when done, pushed your "NFL caliber" D-lineman around.

As far as LB...I can only remember a few plays where your stud LBs even had major impact, however UW's 3 star LBs and Dline where blowing up your offense almost every single play. Just keep in mind that after Orr went out on the first play, you didn't even see our two best ILBs.

I don't think even you will disagree that UWs special teams were far better then yours.

QB play... about even. Both had some good and some bad throws.

That reality of the game was that we dominated you in every facet of the game. If not for 2 boneheaded turnovers and a questionable coaching call on a 4th down we could have won by 20 plus.

Fact is, you got your asses kicked, it wasn't just coaching schemes and play calling. YOU WERE OUT TALENTED. 5 stars only count until the player gets on campus. Then the mettle of the man is developed and honed which UW does it almost better then anyone.

quote:

---

But that game was painful to watch

---

IDK, as a former offensive lineman, it was kind of a thing of beauty. But beauty is in the eye of the beholder I guess. LOL. That type of game we UW fans are used to and it works for us.

I think I pretty much nailed how this game could go. LINK

I expect that your team will improve and contend for the SEC west title. But you need better QB play.

FWIW, I loved this match up between UW and LSU....THAT WAS SMASH MOUTH FOOTBALL and it was awesome, enjoyed every second of it whether we won or lost. It was a hard fought game in the best possible venue. Lets do it again sometime. I'll be rooting for you the rest of the way. Good Luck!

On Wisconsin!

[quote] Playboy has published a list of party schools in 1987, 2002, 2006, and every year since 2009. The 1987 list included forty schools, with sixteen honorable mentions; California State University. In 2002, the list featured twenty-five schools and ten honorable mentions and was topped by Arizona State University. The University of Wisconsin–Madison placed first among ten schools in 2006,

It is widely believed that Playboy released additional lists of party schools in the past, but this claim has been debunked by Snopes.com. Playboy did describe the University of Wisconsin as "the party school" in a September 1968 issue.


Looks like we were both wrong but don't see any mention of LSU.

quote:

---

LSU had that same reputation in the 90's

---

UW also has had that reputation since the 90's... the 1890's! :cheers:

quote:

---

Hopefully there is enough!!!

---

That's the great thing about having it in Green Bay vs. Houston... if we run low, we just have to call down to Milwaukee and have them make more! :dude:

quote:

---

I thought it was because Barry Alvarez was scared to play in Tiger Stadium

---

Actually, UW has a very hard time getting the "Big boys" to do a home and home. There is a lot of risk for teams that are considered "blue bloods" to come to Madison. Camp Randall is known as one of the toughest home environments in CFB. That, along with UW's on field success for the past 25 years, and UW's home winning pct; makes programs with higher prestige (Texas, ND, USC, UCLA, LSU, Bama, Miami) very wary about visiting Madison. Statistically, there is a much higher chance of defeat, knocking them out of championship contention then say visiting a Minnesota or Purdue.

Wisconsin also doesn't have that "elite" program status of say a Penn State or Nebraska (even though UW has been consistently better them both programs recently). Most "Blue Bloods" don't perceive UW on their level. Just read the posts on this site as proof.

Another reason most choose not to come to Madison is Wisconsin's state HS football isn't strong, coupled with the fact the UW lands 90% of the D1 talent in the state. Little recruiting advantage for the "blue bloods" to risk it.

Barry has no problem with scheduling the "Big boys" (see LSU, Bama), he just cant get the "big boys" to agree to come to Madison. IMO, there was little chance LSU would ever have come to WI had it not been for the chance to play a neutral site game in iconic Lambeau Field.

quote:

---

LSU will have 5-6 big plays and will score at least 45 pts. You have zero chance, brah.

---

Good analysis... might happen, however UW rarely gives up many big plays. You might win, but I feel it'll be more of a grind it out type game. Besides, if Bama didn't stick 45 on us last year, I feel pretty confident you won't either.

quote:

---

Clement would be 3rd string. Sorry to bust your bubble.

---

This can never be proven so lets just agree to disagree :cheers:

Didn't say he'd start, but he would get his carries. Hell, he had 900 yards backing up Melvin as a So. Come on... give in a little bit, LSU doesn't corner the market on stud players, other teams have some too.