Started By
Message

re: Is this blatant stupidity or am I missing something?

Posted on 4/16/12 at 1:06 pm to
Posted by Friend of OBUDan
Member since Dec 2008
9963 posts
Posted on 4/16/12 at 1:06 pm to
Easy to say after the fact that a team "didn't even try." They didn't field a weakened squad and they sure looked like they were trying to win. Sure, in the long run it may have helped but they certainly didn't concede the matches.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
37019 posts
Posted on 4/16/12 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

Does all of this not seem like a super easy formula for how an English team(s) can take over world football? Why doesn't a team like Liverpool, Tottenham, Villa- whoever, bring in Bielsa and learn to play the Spanish system with some of their players and some lesser known Spanish players. Give him control to the academy and let him bring through young players that fit his style while recruiting accordingly.


Because, outside of bringing Spanish players in immediately, it will take a very long time to build a Spanish style of play. The tika-taka has become more pronounced in recent years, but it's not any different from the Total Football espoused by the Dutch, at least philosophically. What Barca does better than most teams in the world is their use of width. It's why they can break down even the most compact of teams, because they are always threatening with width, making the opposition move backward and horizontally while the ball moves forward and vertically.

Implementing a system like that has taken the better part of 30 years. Barca's academy was reorganized in 1979. It wasn't till 1988 that they produced their first La Masia product. Teams don't have that type of time any more, nor do they have the patience. Another more recent example. Arsenal reorganized their academy in 1996. The first player who you could say was the perfect player for Wenger's now ideal system was produced 15 years after that reorganization.

Few managers can simply plug in a system and find players to play in it. There has to be some compromise at all times with the ideal system changed to fit the players available.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
37019 posts
Posted on 4/16/12 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

It's clear as day that this is THE best way of playing soccer in current times, so why don't some of these teams that are so close to the top do this?


Chelsea tried, and found their players completely resistant to it. AVB will go somewhere where he will have time, and do very well, because the system he is proposing puts so much pressure on opposing teams that it can't not work.
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
50390 posts
Posted on 4/16/12 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

frick off dude, you are a fricking idiot.

you are a moron. of course they wanted to win.

did they field a different from normal starting eleven? of course they did, but they still wanted to win.

quote:

lets give our all

ziiiiing. ahah. now I've got it. a strip wearing American hipster who knows nothing about football.

quote:

frick winning the EPL, frick trying to catch up to City on points, lets give our all and try to win the europa league so we can make 3 or 4 million whole dollars. City was thinking the exact same thing, they gave their all as well.

major bankrolled douchebag sides should not have been bounced of the Champion's League, amirite?

which leads us back to you have absolutely no clue when it comes to football.

Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
50390 posts
Posted on 4/16/12 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

darkhorse

means they have a shot.

below favourites, above also-rans.
Posted by Mr. Shake
The Sickbed of Cuchulainn
Member since Dec 2009
817 posts
Posted on 4/16/12 at 1:22 pm to
4 years ago, 3 of the 4 semifinalists in the UCL were English. Maybe the English clubs are/will evolve to compete with the current Spanish style, but it takes some time.

Plus, Xavi, Iniesta, and Messi aren't gonna be around forever.
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
50390 posts
Posted on 4/16/12 at 1:23 pm to
As 10 years ago 3 of the 4 were Spanish, and many a time since, there have been 2.


I believe the Italians have also had three in the past decade as well.


What's your point?
This post was edited on 4/16/12 at 1:25 pm
Posted by Mr. Shake
The Sickbed of Cuchulainn
Member since Dec 2009
817 posts
Posted on 4/16/12 at 1:29 pm to
My point is things go in cycles. Why should the English/Germans/Dutch/Italians abandon their style when it has worked out pretty well for them in the past? Or does everyone think Spain is about to go 60's Boston Celtics on Europe?
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
50390 posts
Posted on 4/16/12 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

Or does everyone think Spain is about to go 60's Boston Celtics on Europe?

if RM or BCN win it all again this year, you could safely apply said moniker to La Liga in my opinion.

another Euro Cup, and the national side is definitely up there in GOAT talks.
Posted by tickfawtiger
Killian LA
Member since Sep 2005
11180 posts
Posted on 4/16/12 at 2:39 pm to
Genearally...the English national team fall in line BEHIND....Spain, Germany, Netherlands,Italy, Brazil, Argentina, France and several others...they are NOT favorites and have not been since 1970.
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 4/16/12 at 3:47 pm to
quote:


Spain has 2 decent teams, the rest are pretty poor in quality really.


Which is why Bilbao raped ManU?
Posted by BleedPurpleGold
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2005
18943 posts
Posted on 4/16/12 at 4:18 pm to
quote:


Which is why Bilbao raped ManU?


While I understand and agree with the Spanish boys' point, to claim Bilbao is better than United is laughable.
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
50390 posts
Posted on 4/16/12 at 4:33 pm to
quote:



While I understand and agree with the Spanish boys' point, to claim Bilbao is better than United is laughable.

This year, to claim maure is better than Bilbao is just as laughable.
Posted by BleedPurpleGold
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2005
18943 posts
Posted on 4/16/12 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

This year, to claim maure is better than Bilbao is just as laughable.


I certainly hope this is a joke. Bilbao are good this year. Maybe on par with current form Tottenham. But are you honestly saying the 7th ranked team in La Liga is equal to the best English team in the EPL? A team 40 points off pace with the league leaders and having a grand total GD of 4?

Come on dude.
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 4/16/12 at 5:03 pm to
quote:


I certainly hope this is a joke. Bilbao are good this year. Maybe on par with current form Tottenham. But are you honestly saying the 7th ranked team in La Liga is equal to the best English team in the EPL? A team 40 points off pace with the league leaders and having a grand total GD of 4?


I'd say Europe this year has shown that the EPL is at best the 3rd best league in the world.
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
50390 posts
Posted on 4/16/12 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

A team 40 points off pace with the league leaders

shows how superior La Liga is, doesn't it?
Posted by BleedPurpleGold
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2005
18943 posts
Posted on 4/16/12 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

shows how superior La Liga is, doesn't it?



Assuming your flawed conclusion is correct, yes.
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
7960 posts
Posted on 4/16/12 at 5:14 pm to
I realize that not many posters here follow Serie A but there's also some interesting changes happening.

In regard to the original post, AS Roma's current experiment with Luis Enrique bears watching as it's precisely what's being suggested. As most are aware, Enrique was the Barca B manager and came to Roma this year with the promise of a long term commitment from management to implement a possession, 4-3-3 based style similar to Barca's.


The jury is still out on how well this style will translate to Serie A.

The main criticism of it is that without a Messi-like talent in the false 9 it's too susceptible to dropping points against the type smaller clubs that are extremely well organized defensively and have pace up front to make one pay on counters against an extremely high line with fullbacks fully engaged in the attack. Of course, these are the type mid to lower table clubs that Serie A has in abundance.

So far, this has been the case, but LE's still playing with a very young group of players that are new to the system and at least one transfer window away from having a competent defensive back line.


Also of note has been the growing trend in Italy toward 3 man back lines with the success of Napoli, Udinese, Catania etc. . . Here, as crazy4lsu points out, much of the success of the system is dependent on width coming from a great wing back. In Napoli's case for example, as much as everyone credits Lavezzi, Cavani and Hamsic, I would argue that the most valuable player is Christian Maggio. He's the one player whose absence sees their entire attack fall to pieces. Isla for Udinese is similar.










Posted by BleedPurpleGold
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2005
18943 posts
Posted on 4/16/12 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

I'd say Europe this year has shown that the EPL is at best the 3rd best league in the world.


Ok sure, for argument's sake I'll agree. What does that have to do with Bilbao being just as good as United? In fact, in my original post I said I agree with the La Liga guys.

Using that logic, the Cypriot league is better than the French? Um, no.
This post was edited on 4/16/12 at 5:16 pm
Posted by LfcSU3520
Arizona
Member since Dec 2003
24466 posts
Posted on 4/16/12 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

I certainly hope this is a joke. Bilbao are good this year. Maybe on par with current form Tottenham. But are you honestly saying the 7th ranked team in La Liga is equal to the best English team in the EPL? A team 40 points off pace with the league leaders and having a grand total GD of 4?

Come on dude.


are you serious? You're comparing apples and oranges. Bilbao cleaned United's clock, twice. That's all I need to see. Maybe they're lower in their own table because their competition is actually better. Then they get put up against the 'best' English team, and find it easy going. It's very possible and if true would only further highlight my original point.

Anyways, it's been lost in the discussion, but my question was why doesn't a top-3 outsider in the PL implement this system? There really isn't anything to lose, especially if done with say Bielsa at the helm.

As for the 'it takes a long time' argument, that's true, but he's had a lot of success quickly with a club that played a very english brand of soccer.

To me it just seems like such an easy way to build a powerhouse from the outside. Your ceiling will always be limited in Spanish football because you're: playing against teams who have better players and money (while using the same style) and the revenue is shared so disproportionately. In England, you would be playing a style which has proven to be very difficult for english teams to cope with, but with the ability to buy better players because you have more money.

Clubs like Chelsea can't attempt this and we saw why this year. It would even be tough at Liverpool but the right ownership group is in place for something like that. But a team like Villa? Why not.

first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram