- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bayern vs Hoffenheim stopped because away Bayern fans
Posted on 3/3/20 at 9:33 am to GeauxColonels
Posted on 3/3/20 at 9:33 am to GeauxColonels
quote:
Has anything happened recently that caused an increase in the vitrol toward Hopp these past few weeks?
LINK
good break down of whats going on
Hopp is a fricking bitch
2
Posted on 3/3/20 at 9:39 am to Dead End
quote:
I'll never understand why that's an issue. Love them or hate them, Bayern always buy the best players from their opponents. It's makes the league more entertaining and competitive when a club can tell them to frick off.
It’s exactly why FFP was implemented. To stop smaller, less historic clubs from being purchased by a billionaire and threatening the status quo of the big boys in every league.
Posted on 3/3/20 at 10:24 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
LINK
good break down of whats going on
Hopp is a fricking bitch
Holy shite bro, you just got an article for me to read?
I can't watch a youtube video at work.
Posted on 3/3/20 at 10:52 am to McCaigBro69
It was put into place so clubs wouldn’t go extremely into the red and it’s worked
No one has issues with owners buying clubs
The issue people have is countries buying clubs
No one has issues with owners buying clubs
The issue people have is countries buying clubs
Posted on 3/3/20 at 10:56 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
The issue people have is countries buying clubs
I would rather have fan-owned clubs than any billionaires at all owning clubs. The 50+1 rule is a great rule.
Money has ruined the PL in a lot of ways. The teams up and down the league are worse at actually playing soccer than they were 10 years ago. I thought Pool's play would lead to some change in the overall quality of the league, but it has been remarkably poor, with only a few bright spots, for the past decade.
Posted on 3/3/20 at 11:22 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
Money has ruined the PL in a lot of ways. The teams up and down the league are worse at actually playing soccer than they were 10 years ago.
Liverpool and City are not worse than they were 10 years ago.
It isn’t their job to be sure every other club can keep up.
quote:
The issue people have is countries buying clubs
I agree to an extent, and I know you are meaning City with this comment, but I really don’t see a single thing that Mansour has done that’s been bad for the sport, premier league or Manchester.
Added a world class academy, the club is always doing things in the community, created another top team and ultimately upped the standards for the rest of the top six, etc.
I’d understand it if he was around the club non-stop building a celebrity Iike reputation, but he’s been to a single match.
People can cry about him as much as they want but there really is no valid reason to dislike him aside from the fact that he’s rich as frick and invested his own cash into his own entity and left everybody in the dust in regards to how a club is run from top to bottom.
Posted on 3/3/20 at 11:24 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
It was put into place so clubs wouldn’t go extremely into the red and it’s worked
Then why do they limit what a club can clearly afford? Glazers can take out millions of dollars in debt in United, Barcelona have taken loans to pay for transfers in recent years, but a club owner can’t spend however much of own cash he wants on his own entity?
Makes no sense.
Posted on 3/3/20 at 11:38 am to McCaigBro69
quote:
Liverpool and City are not worse than they were 10 years ago.
It isn’t their job to be sure every other club can keep up.
I'm talking about the pattern of play on the field, which is far worse in the league, and has been for at least the last half-decade. Part of that is managerial turnover, but also many clubs have bought remarkably poorly. The results in Europe up until last year support my contention too.
Posted on 3/3/20 at 11:47 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
The results in Europe up until last year support my contention too.
Yeah, you aren’t wrong. City still have the highest European coefficient in the league
Posted on 3/3/20 at 11:58 am to McCaigBro69
quote:
Then why do they limit what a club can clearly afford? Glazers can take out millions of dollars in debt in United, Barcelona have taken loans to pay for transfers in recent years, but a club owner can’t spend however much of own cash he wants on his own entity?
Makes no sense.
Bc United is still self sufficient
And I agree something should be done about the glazers milking the club
Posted on 3/3/20 at 12:04 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Bc United is still self sufficient
I get this argument in most circumstances, but Mansour isn’t going to go broke. All FFP does is stop him from investing however much he wishes into something he owns.
Just because a bunch of other slapdicks have fricked up other clubs doesn’t mean it’s the norm.
Pretty funny that Leicester are going to get away with doing the exact same thing as well. They wouldn’t have ever came up if the rules were applied consistently.
Posted on 3/3/20 at 12:33 pm to McCaigBro69
quote:
I get this argument in most circumstances, but Mansour isn’t going to go broke. All FFP does is stop him from investing however much he wishes into something he owns.
Just because a bunch of other slapdicks have fricked up other clubs doesn’t mean it’s the norm.
Pretty funny that Leicester are going to get away with doing the exact same thing as well. They wouldn’t have ever came up if the rules were applied consistently.
UAE also has other motives though, they are trying to invest in as much as they can before their oil money goes away. City was a door into the UK real estate and investment market.
There as been a ton of issues between Airlines around the world and Etihad and Emirates. For these same type of issues with a gov't essentially owning them and providing an unfair competitive advantage bc they don't care if they take losses.
This post was edited on 3/3/20 at 12:34 pm
Posted on 3/3/20 at 1:18 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
UAE also has other motives though, they are trying to invest in as much as they can before their oil money goes away. City was a door into the UK real estate and investment market.
So what's the issue here?
Posted on 3/3/20 at 1:21 pm to I Bleed Garnet
quote:
So what's the issue here?
Do you want Arabs who fund terrorism running the world?
Posted on 3/3/20 at 1:49 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Do you want Arabs who fund terrorism running the world?
I mean don't they already?
Posted on 3/3/20 at 6:45 pm to StraightCashHomey21
Okay just watched that.
Germany is lame as shite, and Hopp is a little bitch.
Both are tools
Germany is lame as shite, and Hopp is a little bitch.
Both are tools
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News