- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2018 Atlanta United FC Season-Long Thread
Posted on 5/20/18 at 7:53 pm to pvilleguru
Posted on 5/20/18 at 7:53 pm to pvilleguru
Running 3 centerbacks against a formation that only has one natural striker can easily get defenders out of position, you’ve got to be really disciplined and... Atlanta’s defense ain’t
you’re not getting any of the benefits of playing 3 back if guys are getting free that easily
The 4-3-3 they used earlier this month would’ve been a perfect foil against how NYRB lined up
you’re not getting any of the benefits of playing 3 back if guys are getting free that easily
The 4-3-3 they used earlier this month would’ve been a perfect foil against how NYRB lined up
This post was edited on 5/20/18 at 7:55 pm
0
Posted on 5/20/18 at 7:54 pm to pvilleguru
It clearly wasnt on purpose.
Would have been a clean tackle but because he was getting pulled down from behind, instead of getting the side of the ball he got the top and his foot bounced off the top like a rocket.
Anyone who thinks Garza went studs up on purpose is a fool.
Would have been a clean tackle but because he was getting pulled down from behind, instead of getting the side of the ball he got the top and his foot bounced off the top like a rocket.
Anyone who thinks Garza went studs up on purpose is a fool.
Posted on 5/20/18 at 7:54 pm to beatbammer
Yep mls should have over turned that on VAR
Posted on 5/20/18 at 7:56 pm to beatbammer
quote:
Anyone who thinks Garza went studs up on purpose is a fool.
Doesn't really matter if it was on purpose or not.
His studs were up and he hit that dude right in the knee with them.
Posted on 5/20/18 at 7:57 pm to kengel2
quote:It does when it's something fluky like your foot taking a bounce off the ball.
Doesn't really matter if it was on purpose or not.
Posted on 5/20/18 at 7:59 pm to pvilleguru
quote:
It does when it's something fluky like your foot taking a bounce off the ball.
So you're saying its not a found because it was an accident?
That's not how this works.
Posted on 5/20/18 at 8:02 pm to kengel2
It shouldn’t have been a foul bc it was all caused by a Red Bull player pulling him down.
Much like it isn’t kick catch interference if you are blocked Into the guy
Much like it isn’t kick catch interference if you are blocked Into the guy
Posted on 5/20/18 at 8:03 pm to kengel2
quote:Foul? Yes. Red? frick no.
So you're saying its not a found because it was an accident?
Posted on 5/20/18 at 8:04 pm to pvilleguru
Yea I’d even buy a yellow for it but straight red, nah
Posted on 5/20/18 at 8:08 pm to pvilleguru
I think it's a red, his studs were up and caught the dude.
It being an accident or dirty doesn't matter. He came over the ball studs up into the other player. It's a dangerous play and was called correctly.
It being an accident or dirty doesn't matter. He came over the ball studs up into the other player. It's a dangerous play and was called correctly.
Posted on 5/20/18 at 8:27 pm to kengel2
There's a HUGE difference between:
and
If you can't see the difference, there's really no reasoning with you.
quote:
He came over the ball studs up
and
quote:
His studs came up after rebounding off of the ball
If you can't see the difference, there's really no reasoning with you.
Posted on 5/20/18 at 8:35 pm to beatbammer
quote:
If you can't see the difference, there's really no reasoning with you.
Did his foot go over the ball studs up and then catch the other player in the knee with his studs?
Posted on 5/20/18 at 8:39 pm to kengel2
Hypothetical situation/question for kengel2:
Player A (in a red-and-black shirt) and Player N1 (in a white shirt) are playing a long-ball coming toward them. Player N2 (also in a white shirt) is standing close at hand.
As Player A goes up to play the ball, Player N1 undercuts him and Player A begins to flip. As Player A goes topsy-turvy, his boot comes up and kicks player N2 in the face.
Player N2's face is bloodied and has to leave the game. NO FOUL was called on Player N1 for his undercutting of Player A.
Is Player A issued a red card for a high boot to Player N2's face?
I will assume that your answer will be "yes" since your rationale above is a foul is a foul is a foul, it doesn't matter if it was intentional or accidental.
Player A (in a red-and-black shirt) and Player N1 (in a white shirt) are playing a long-ball coming toward them. Player N2 (also in a white shirt) is standing close at hand.
As Player A goes up to play the ball, Player N1 undercuts him and Player A begins to flip. As Player A goes topsy-turvy, his boot comes up and kicks player N2 in the face.
Player N2's face is bloodied and has to leave the game. NO FOUL was called on Player N1 for his undercutting of Player A.
Is Player A issued a red card for a high boot to Player N2's face?
I will assume that your answer will be "yes" since your rationale above is a foul is a foul is a foul, it doesn't matter if it was intentional or accidental.
Posted on 5/20/18 at 8:41 pm to kengel2
quote:
Did his foot go over the ball studs up and then catch the other player in the knee with his studs?
His foot was not studs up until it rebounded off the ball.
So the answer to your question is, no, his foot did not go "over the ball studs up".
Did the player's studs catch the opposing player's knee after rebounding studs-up off the ball? Yes.
Posted on 5/21/18 at 5:28 am to beatbammer
I like that tata called out Geiger for his bullshite
Posted on 5/21/18 at 7:28 pm to heartbreakTiger
I googled "mls officiating controversy" and the 5th entry that popped up was the Wiki entry on Mark Geiger. 
Posted on 5/21/18 at 9:18 pm to beatbammer
I have a feeling the cucks in the mls office are going to fine the frick out of tata, Guzan and lgp
Posted on 5/22/18 at 6:37 am to heartbreakTiger
Oh look, the Professional Referees Organization defends and affirms every bad call in the AUFC/NYRB match. And if it takes them having to lie to do it then, dammit, that's what they'll do!
https://www.ajc.com/sports/pro-answers-questions-about-atlanta-united-new-york-red-bulls/UqHHqYwJuNgErJtooVpA5H/
https://www.ajc.com/sports/pro-answers-questions-about-atlanta-united-new-york-red-bulls/UqHHqYwJuNgErJtooVpA5H/
Posted on 5/22/18 at 7:54 am to beatbammer
*ETA* I'm just to the point now where I assume every goal we score is going to be reviewed and somehow deemed not a goal. It's insane.
This post was edited on 5/22/18 at 7:56 am
Posted on 5/22/18 at 8:59 am to beatbammer
Yea not surprised. No sports league ever has the balls to call out bad calls.
Page 36 of 81
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News