- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

For the Bammers....
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:27 pm
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:27 pm
"After interviewing Peterson, I returned to the field, where I snapped a few photos of a small gash in the field between the 31- and 32-yard line
This post was edited on 11/7/09 at 8:51 pm
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:28 pm to WelcomeToDeathValley
YEP he got the 1st. It wasn't indisputable evidence. It probably wouldn't have mattered anyway. /thread
This post was edited on 11/7/09 at 8:31 pm
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:28 pm to ACL11190
Like that one call lost LSU the game...had nothing to do with how Bama played!




Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:28 pm to ACL11190

Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:30 pm to WelcomeToDeathValley
For the coonasses:
24-15.
Got Saban?
24-15.
Got Saban?
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:31 pm to WelcomeToDeathValley
What you dumb fricks don't understand is that everyone knows his left foot was in bounds. But, he didn't have possession of the ball long enough at that point. The question is if he right foot was on the line or not. There's no indisputable evidence, so please cry about something else.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:31 pm to WelcomeToDeathValley
That mark could have been made by anybody. It could have been made by Julio when he was pushed out of bounds.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:31 pm to CrimsonCrush
quote:
Like that one call lost LSU the game.
no but it would have given lsu an opportunity to win.
how do yall not see this? it amazes me.
if the roles were reversed im sure bama nation would be completely ok with it.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:32 pm to rhYno
quote:
Got Saban?
No. Got textbooks though.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:32 pm to Teague
quote:
What you dumb fricks don't understand is that everyone knows his left foot was in bounds. But, he didn't have possession of the ball long enough at that point.
Explain how he didn't have possession long enough. The ball was in his hands. That's all you need for possession.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:32 pm to jatebe
quote:
That mark could have been made by anybody. It could have been made by Julio when he was pushed out of bounds.
If this cleat mark could talk ... it'd confirm that Patrick Peterson's fourth-quarter interception should've counted for LSU.
---the caption of the picture---
"After interviewing Peterson, I returned to the field, where I snapped a few photos of a small gash in the field between the 31- and 32-yard line
This post was edited on 11/7/09 at 8:36 pm
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:35 pm to WelcomeToDeathValley
Don't worry, after a week of hearing the Bobby Bouchers cry, roughly 15 pictures will surface of the missed holding and PI calls that the coonasses go away with.
2 in a row to SABAN!
2 in a row to SABAN!
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:36 pm to rhYno
you guys are ridiculous, not a chance in hell you come onto this board and expect that call to not be the main topic of conversation.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:39 pm to WelcomeToDeathValley
quote:
if the roles were reversed im sure I'd have said that our offense can't move the ball with the backup QB AND the backup RB. So, it wouldn't have mattered anyway. Maybe, it would've helped if we hadn't wasted our timeouts so early.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:40 pm to Crimsonpanther13
quote:
roughly 15 pictures will surface of the missed holding and PI calls that the coonasses got away with.
were those reviewable and/or did they come during the most crucial part of the game?
quote:
if the roles were reversed im sure I'd have said that our offense can't move the ball with the backup QB AND the backup RB. So, it wouldn't have mattered anyway. Maybe, it would've helped if we hadn't wasted our timeouts so early.
oh im supremely confident yall would have said that, probably verbatim.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:40 pm to WelcomeToDeathValley
quote:
no but it would have given lsu an opportunity to win.
So you think that would have been the only opportunity for LSU to win the game? Do you realize there were 59 minutes of play besides that one?
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:42 pm to Schwaaz
quote:
So you think that would have been the only opportunity for LSU to win the game? Do you realize there were 59 minutes of play besides that one?
i had no idea the games were 60 minutes, I appreciate that gem.
nobody would say shite about Bama had we been shut down on that potential drive. its funny to me because yall are as rabid a fan base as LSU but you cant just sit back for 1 minute and imagine the same call going against Alabama. I imagine you'd think to yourself "man that was a bad call but we had other chances to win"....please
This post was edited on 11/7/09 at 8:46 pm
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:44 pm to jatebe
quote:
That mark could have been made by anybody. It could have been made by Julio when he was pushed out of bounds.
It was made by Smelly on the catch that was called out.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:45 pm to GOBAMA90
quote:
It was made by Smelly on the catch that was called out.
Exactly. If Peterson had an INT, then Smelly had a catch.
Popular
Back to top
