- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Can Bama Fans Explain this?
Posted on 11/7/09 at 10:51 pm to Prominentwon
Posted on 11/7/09 at 10:51 pm to Prominentwon
Sir...you there, behind the keyboard...yeah you...quit whining.
You let ME hang 276 on you...plus our D sent your entire offense to the shop. And hey, 9 yards TOTAL in the fourth quarter? Thats why you lost.
You let ME hang 276 on you...plus our D sent your entire offense to the shop. And hey, 9 yards TOTAL in the fourth quarter? Thats why you lost.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 10:52 pm to cajunbama
quote:
Of course no
we all know what opinions are like (a/h), especially out of The Great Red Ant Hill of the South....

Posted on 11/7/09 at 10:54 pm to Charles Bronson
quote:
Would LSU have scored?
We will never know would we?
Posted on 11/7/09 at 10:55 pm to Prominentwon
As quoted by the author....
"There is no way to confirm that Peterson's foot made the mark; it could have been made at any point during the game."
"There is no way to confirm that Peterson's foot made the mark; it could have been made at any point during the game."
Posted on 11/7/09 at 11:00 pm to jatebe
Every one of you mother frickers on this board knows what the call should have been.
You guys are reminding me why I DESPISE Bama fans.
You guys are reminding me why I DESPISE Bama fans.
This post was edited on 11/7/09 at 11:01 pm
Posted on 11/7/09 at 11:01 pm to Prominentwon
Stop acting like every Bama fan is thinking it's the right call. I've said several fricking times already that it should've been an interception.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 11:01 pm to Charles Bronson
It was a bad call. Not saying LSU would have driven the 70 yards to score. But it was a bad call.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 11:03 pm to Prominentwon
Good grief Prom, people are agreeing it should have been an INT. What else do you want?
Posted on 11/7/09 at 11:04 pm to Prominentwon
quote:
That's a good start. All I see are you Alabama fans beating their chest like this was a clean win and nothing was wrong with it.
It was a clean win that didnt cost you the game, yor ineffective offense in the second half and the inablity to stop our running game did. We beat you in the fourth qtr.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 11:06 pm to DvlsAdvocat
quote:
You let ME hang 276 on you.. And hey, 9 yards TOTAL in the fourth quarter? Thats why you lost.
This.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 11:10 pm to Crimsoncutie98
quote:
What else do you want?
He wants us to proclaim that it was the right call - so he can rationalize the way he feels right now and further proclaim that the Bama fan base as a whole is retarded. Unfortunately for him, there seem to be many more rational, level headed Bama fans on this board than would allow support for his theory.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 11:14 pm to Charles Bronson
Guys, it is your year, but it is really getting old that the least penalized team in SEC is bama and the most is whoever is playing them. You guys used to ge an extra SECgame vs Vandy in the 70's, the SEC is in Bama, and I honestly cant remember you losing by a bad call, although I am sure you guys will remind me. Hell, that is not even one of the calls that has me pissed off. The 6 obvious holds that we missed, the Sac where the Dlineman neraly beheaded our tackle hi held his facemask so long in clear view of linesman. I think even Danielson caught these. Every real SEC fans knows that Florida starting getting better calls after they threatened to leave SEC in early 90's. With the NBA ref tell all book out now were the Felon Ref tells detailed stories about how they have been fixing games for years and have special fixer's Refs, what do you guys wants us to think? There is serious bias or they are just really terrible. Either way, it really sucks. BTW, you will not get SEC refs in NC game and I am hearing that we get big ten refs in SEC championship game.
I really hope they just suck but I am beginning to wonder if there is more to it than that.
Anyway, it is really a shame to be talking baout this crap after a really good game.
I really hope they just suck but I am beginning to wonder if there is more to it than that.
Anyway, it is really a shame to be talking baout this crap after a really good game.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 11:16 pm to Jackfish28
quote:
the least penalized team in SEC is bama
I highly doubt that is true. We had over 100 yards in penalties vs. USC...and that is just one game.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 11:17 pm to Jackfish28
quote:
but it is really getting old that the least penalized team in SEC is bama and the most is whoever is playing them.
This is simply not true. There is no statistic that supports this, and in fact - there are a couple of statistics that completely debunk this idea. I believe we are 7th in the SEC in penalties, and we are 4th in the SEC for opponent penalties.
This post was edited on 11/7/09 at 11:18 pm
Posted on 11/7/09 at 11:18 pm to Jackfish28
quote:
you losing by a bad call
the noncall on Webster had just as much effect on that game as the int had on this one. No conspiracy just a bad call. remeber that is 2 wks in a row that the review booth has been broken at the beginning of the game and we couldnt review plays that would have been changed in our favor. By the way is the school responsible for that equipment or not?
Posted on 11/7/09 at 11:27 pm to Prominentwon
quote:
Have fun getting beat by Florida and then hopefully TCU in the Sugar Bowl.
Have fun watching Bama play in the SEC championship game from your couch. Keep rooting for Florida though, someone else you couldn't beat.

Posted on 11/7/09 at 11:28 pm to labamafan
quote:
9 yards TOTAL in the fourth quarter?
might have had something to do with not having our starting qb and rb for the whole quarter.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 11:31 pm to lob1284
quote:
might have had something to do with not having our starting qb and rb for the whole quarter.
It had a lot to do with that. That's also the reason that the McElroy would-be INT didn't matter.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 11:32 pm to lob1284
Are there any other angles than what's on SC?
If not then I'm not seeing a basis for this conspiracy.
If not then I'm not seeing a basis for this conspiracy.
This post was edited on 11/7/09 at 11:34 pm
Posted on 11/7/09 at 11:34 pm to lob1284
quote:
might have had something to do with not having our starting qb and rb for the whole quarter.
That was more of a factor than the call. It's just part of the game.
Popular
Back to top
