- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Zuckerberg Gave $6M To Anti 2A Groups Last Year While Spending $45M On Armed Security
Posted on 7/10/23 at 8:25 pm
Posted on 7/10/23 at 8:25 pm
Armed protection should be for elites only. It’s the only way for someone like Zuckerberg.
On Fox & Friends this morning. The country will be a lot safer once the government gets all y’all’s guns. Now, in the coming years, or when you die, however y’all want to do it.
7
Posted on 7/10/23 at 8:50 pm to LuckyTiger
Zuckerberg is a giant fig.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 8:51 pm to ItNeverRains
>Zuckerberg is a giant lizard
Posted on 7/10/23 at 9:07 pm to LuckyTiger
Every single major left wing initiative in the entire world is propped up by Jewish billionaires.
People get mad when you point it out but it's provably true.
People get mad when you point it out but it's provably true.
This post was edited on 7/10/23 at 9:08 pm
Posted on 7/10/23 at 9:34 pm to LuckyTiger
Treasonous bitches usually do have to hide behind security
Posted on 7/10/23 at 9:36 pm to LuckyTiger
OPEN QUESTION TO ANYBODY on this board ... know who the guy is behind Zuckerburg in the OP post?
This post was edited on 7/10/23 at 9:38 pm
Posted on 7/10/23 at 9:41 pm to Marcus Aurelius
quote:
know who the guy is behind Zuck
Tim Nelson
Posted on 7/10/23 at 9:57 pm to FATBOY TIGER
WRONG ... of course, I'll be accused of being a DC insider for knowing what most everybody should know.
quote:
know who the guy is behind Zuck
Tim Nelson
quote:
know who the guy is behind Zuck
Tim Nelson
This post was edited on 7/10/23 at 10:05 pm
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:57 am to LuckyTiger
You say anti 2A groups but were they advocating for doing away with guns altogether or just for enacting reform over gun rights? There’s a big difference between the two
Posted on 7/11/23 at 4:25 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
You say anti 2A groups but were they advocating for doing away with guns altogether or just for enacting reform over gun rights? There’s a big difference between the two
Any step toward "reform over gun rights" currently IS and HAS BEEN anti 2nd Amendment. It is just a measure of how big a step it is.
"shall not be infringed"
Posted on 7/11/23 at 4:31 am to Texas Yarddog
quote:
Any step toward "reform over gun rights" currently IS and HAS BEEN anti 2nd Amendment. It is just a measure of how big a step it is.
"shall not be infringed"
At some point this line of reasoning will fade away. Restricting your access to automatic rifles for instance is not infringing on your freedom to own a firearm. Plenty of countries around the world have access to firearms, but the United States seems to have the biggest problem with them. I don’t know what the answer is but perhaps it wouldn’t hurt us to look at these other countries that seem to have got it right and see what we can learn from them and implement.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 4:34 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
You say anti 2A groups but were they advocating for doing away with guns altogether or just for enacting reform over gun rights?
You have no clue what the 2a means, obviously.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 4:35 am to Texas Yarddog
quote:
Any step toward "reform over gun rights" currently IS and HAS BEEN anti 2nd Amendment.
Bingo.
The guy you are talking to thinks abortion should be wide arse open, but that "gun rights" which is an actual right, should be highly regulated.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 4:37 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Restricting your access to automatic rifles for instance is not infringing on your freedom to own a firearm.
Yes. It absolutely is.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 4:52 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You have no clue what the 2a means, obviously.
I do though. And since no one is in a well regulated militia any longer, and the purpose of said militia no longer exists, does that call into question the rest of it?
quote:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed
This could spiral into pages and pages of back and forth on it but unless one chooses to ignore half the argument then the 2A is a bit more complicated than simply "shall not be infringed".
Posted on 7/11/23 at 4:54 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
And since no one is in a well regulated militia any longer
You clearly don't understand 2A
Posted on 7/11/23 at 4:58 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
You say anti 2A groups but were they advocating for doing away with guns altogether or just for enacting reform over gun rights? There’s a big difference between the two
Slippery slope...give an inch...etc...
Posted on 7/11/23 at 5:05 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
The guy you are talking to thinks abortion should be wide arse open, but that "gun rights" which is an actual right, should be highly regulated.
I don’t think it should be "wide arse open". Third trimester abortions for instance should be out of the question unless the mothers health is in danger. Because by that point the fetus has developed into by and large a functional human. Early into a pregnancy I’m sorry an embryo is an embryo/ a fetus is a fetus and it has no "soul" and you aren’t destroying a person. I get that religion impacts one’s views on the topic and that’s fine so long as that doesn’t interfere with everyone who doesn’t subscribe to it.
And the crazy part is that people seem hell bent on forcing a woman to give birth to a child they can’t handle for one reason or another, primarily financial and the impact another kid would have on the rest of the family. But when you ask them to increase taxes to cover the myriad of expenses that child will incur they go apeshit. So I question their actual compassion for the human they forced into the world.
But alas you got me way sidetracked. Guns. Yes the founding fathers envisioned all modern weaponry, envisioned modern society as a whole, and also wrote that first part of the 2A all willy Nelly and the "shall not be infringed" part was the only thing they thought really was important.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 5:11 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You clearly don't understand 2A
You’ve said that more than once, I question whether you understand it. Hell I question if anyone does to be honest as it was written in a time far removed from the present. And given the verbiage of it the founding fathers in all their wisdom couldn’t completely predict the future. And it seems like Supreme Court rulings and congressional bills and such over the years have tried to morph it to fit our current reality. But our current reality is far different than the reality of 1791.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 5:25 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
And since no one is in a well regulated militia any longer, and the purpose of said militia no longer exists
Because we are not at war. The second we are invaded, I promise you their will be well regulated militias again.
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News