re: X sues Media Matters after report about ads next to antisemitic content

quote:

---

asked for your analysis of the merits.

---

Based solely upon a petition. You clearly don’t understand how it works. You dumb idiot. There is a process. The only thing that can be determined right now is if the allegations in the petition are true there will be damages. You want a judgment before an Answer is even filed. fricking dumbass.

Do you need me to explain what an Answer is to you? Or are you too busy with your “significant” business. Ask mom for that meatloaf you loser.

quote:

---

I’m asking for your analysis of the merits.

---

I’m not sure you understand what this means, pigeon. Otherwise you would understand why I said, if the allegations in the petition are true the case has merit. You want me to opine on merits before an Answer. It’s a stupid fricking question from a dullard. Like always, I can’t understand it for you. You’re just not a smart person.

No one GAF about you.

quote:

---

Ok, you’re either unable to or you are unwilling to provide any analysis.

---

What analysis, specifically, do you think can be done from simply reading the petition? All that can be done is repeat what it says. Holy frick, your lack of legal acumen is shining bright and strong in this thread.


But let’s play. Give me your analysis of the merits. Include citations and legal precedent.

quote:

---

First thing that stood out was venue. Why Fort Worth? Is there a particular judge there favorable to these COAs?

---

Yes, it’s Judge Pittman, trump appointee, and by filing in Texas they avoid anti-slaap statutes in California and elsewhere.

quote:

---

Yeah I saw guys with Texas bar numbers were pending admission.

---

They’re politically connected former attorneys that worked for the AG Paxton…and coincidentally Paxton opened an investigation.

quote:

---

What analysis, specifically, do you think can be done from simply reading the petition?

---

You can’t apply your understanding of the law to the claims? You have zero opinion of the case? Just, who ever wins, wins? you can’t even provide an opinion of the case having read the MM article, the petition and just some general knowledge of the 1A? Jfc.

quote:

---

The new Elon musk derangement syndrome Cwill is participating in some classic liberal projection.

---

All I’ve ever said about musk is that he signed a contract that locked him in and he overpaid. All proven to be true! That was just correct legal analysis on the first part and correct analysis of his motivations and biz analysis on the second. I’m sorry you were wrong on both. But being right about those matters, even if they cast musk in a negative light, has nothing to do with political biases.

quote:

---

They’re politically connected former attorneys that worked for the AG Paxton…and coincidentally Paxton opened an investigation.

---

Are you aware of the local rule in that district?

quote:

---

That was just correct legal analysis on the first part and correct analysis of his motivations and biz analysis on the second. I’m sorry you were wrong on both. But being right about those matters, even if they cast musk in a negative light, has nothing to do with political biases.

---

Your understanding of the law is lower than the juniors I used to teach about commercial law in their undergrad programs. You’re a complete and utter moron.