- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why did 6 swing states stop counting votes?
Posted on 4/30/23 at 3:50 pm to NawlinsTiger9
Posted on 4/30/23 at 3:50 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:I'm about the most rational person you could meet. So, no, not close.
Do you, as a smart guy, ever look around at the company you keep on this topic and think, “goddam, maybe I’m too emotionally invested in this to think rationally”?
Posted on 4/30/23 at 3:55 pm to CelticDog
quote:he is a lifelong professional auditor
now posting 18 months after the fact you can stack 6 unsubstantiated stories in one long blather like the cpa one
and your complaint of four or five paragraphs being too long shows you are only lying. It is all they could be.
Until elections are standardized and fully audited, criminals like you support - and like your lies and "blather" here - are not a trace more than support of election cheating.
still a stench in here... transparency be damned is not a good look.
Posted on 4/30/23 at 3:57 pm to doubleb
quote:they also should not be 95-5
doesn’t mean counting Phillie ballots should also be close
There were precincts with 98-2 in Killadelphia
Posted on 4/30/23 at 4:07 pm to NC_Tigah
Yet you believe absolute nonsense on this very important topic
Fascinating
Fascinating
Posted on 4/30/23 at 4:22 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Do you, as a smart guy, ever look around at the company you keep on this topic and think, “goddam, maybe I’m too emotionally invested in this to think rationally”?
Because you probably should
Yet another useful idiot from the collective telling someone else how & what to think...amazing.
Posted on 4/30/23 at 4:26 pm to 2020_reVISION
quote:
telling someone else how & what to think.
This is you deciding what is Christian and what isn’t. Took me 5 seconds to find you eating your own words and shitting them out.
quote:
Those bishops aren’t Christian. They just identify as such.
So yeah, kick rocks hypocrite.

Posted on 4/30/23 at 4:55 pm to NawlinsTiger9
BUMP!
NEVER FORGET!
"By Any Means Necessary"! "Never Let a Good Crisis Go to Waste"!
11:53pm they ALL STOPPED COUNTING in LOCK STEP! Gonna call it an evening we are so tired! See you in the morning.
NEVER FORGET!
"By Any Means Necessary"! "Never Let a Good Crisis Go to Waste"!
11:53pm they ALL STOPPED COUNTING in LOCK STEP! Gonna call it an evening we are so tired! See you in the morning.
Posted on 4/30/23 at 6:35 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
quote: telling someone else how & what to think.
This is you deciding what is Christian and what isn’t.
Took me 5 seconds to find you eating your own words and shitting them out.
quote: Those bishops aren’t Christian. They just identify as such.
So yeah, kick rocks hypocrite.
That's it? So, you actually admit to searching for something, then present this as your "gotcha?
Not even close, son.

Posted on 4/30/23 at 10:11 pm to TulaneFan
I think they didn't, at first, have enough votes for Biden. So they had to wait to get the reserves. Worked out good, right?
Posted on 5/1/23 at 1:05 am to tivey6301
quote:
Almost as bad as barn fans talking about scammy newton and 2010.
I only know of one poster that has even remotely attempted to talk about Cam Newton on this board recently.
Damn, some of you toothless inbreds have zero self-awareness....
FWIW, Leto is a moron....
Posted on 5/1/23 at 4:58 am to catnip
quote:
think they didn't, at first, have enough votes for Biden. So they had to wait to get the reserves. Worked out good, right?
Pretty much this. They didn’t like the trajectory and stopped counting in six key swing state counties to get an idea of how many extra votes they would need and communicate that to the those counties.
Posted on 5/1/23 at 7:47 am to doubleb
quote:
ARE YOU SERIOUS?!!!
quote:
Yes I’m serious.
Well, we can call off the search, fellas. I found the fricking idiot we have been missing.
Posted on 5/1/23 at 3:28 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
The FBI was never deployed. The investigative arm of the DOJ was never deployed. Not to a single location. Not one.
How do you know?
CISA was deployed and they frequently use the FBI.
Posted on 5/1/23 at 3:44 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
There were precincts with 98-2 in Philadelphia
let's say there were.
the fact of 95-5 vs trump in an all black precinct does not relate in any way to support the paranoia that during the over night something happened to reduce trumps majority.
there are towns in Wyoming that vote 100% gop.
Posted on 5/1/23 at 3:54 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
he is a lifelong professional auditor
this proves what?
the end of his blather claims more people voted in 500 little voting precinct geopolitical entities of hundreds or a few thousand voters had more votes in each of 500 places than people lived in those places.
that's so easy to confirm or knock out of serious issues to look at.
do it. I call b.s.
its a lie thrown in the end of a long rant of many topics. that is a device to get past the reader.
your entire rant by cpa is bogosity. I tore up his key point we are supposed to take home. the last thing.
and it's awful if true so get upset. or look at the sec of state data and ask about 29 states. omg 29.
fwiw i tore up another element of his earlier and I only bothered with two.
I had seen this a year or more ago here. you did too.
its still got mistakes of logic that go beyond "honest mistake". they are structured as a dramatic piece to outrage. you can think that 500 precincts had more votes than people live there.
and yet not one example.
darn.
prove it.
29 states.
This post was edited on 5/1/23 at 4:02 pm
Posted on 5/1/23 at 4:02 pm to texridder
quote:FBI deployments are not subtle, nor are their reports of closed major investigations. Neither occurred.
How do you know?
Barr stated on Dec 1st that the DOJ "had not uncovered voter fraud at a level that would alter the 2020 election results." Great wording ... eh? Barr tossed the FBI in on that statement for good measure. Both were bullshite dismissals.
In Barr's view the GOP does NOT challenge elections.
He leaves that kind of civic incivility to Democrats.
After all, Nixon conceded in 1960. Right?
Dems challenged in 1876, and 2000. Right?
Barr views challenges as fruitless and déclassé. To Barr, concession is 'gentlemenly'.
Further, he felt there is no way to convincingly investigate an election in the 5 week interval between Election Day and the Electoral College assembly. So his effort was to pat Trump on the head and say "good game."
Posted on 5/1/23 at 4:20 pm to CelticDog
quote:That should NOT be the convo.
let's say there were.
Election integrity is important enough to actually prove, or at least to try.
Yet, there has been nothing but obstruction, cover up, and resistance to investigation.
Posted on 5/1/23 at 5:30 pm to TulaneFan
Everybody’s attention went to Arizona the the BS started in the Midwest Can’t forget the water line bust in Atlanta
Popular
Back to top
