Started By
Message

re: When the feds audited, why did they not advise on all the long term bonds at SVB??????

Posted on 3/19/23 at 7:22 am to
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
39221 posts
Posted on 3/19/23 at 7:22 am to
quote:

100% bullshite. Either you or your friend, or both, are morons

quote:

deeprig9

Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46026 posts
Posted on 3/19/23 at 7:44 am to
quote:

And why is no one asking this question. Surely they saw the idiots had over half their portfolio in 10 year bonds when the fed was raising rates every three months.

They could have easily spoken with them and arranged to have them repurchased/traded rather than wait til they had to fire sale them.

I mean, isnt that why we have the fed auditing banks in the first place?

Then again I saw a pic of two of the "fed" employees at the bank, one with a three piece brown suit, sneakers, hair covering his eyes and darn near shoulder length. And this is the guy in charge, I doubt he ever balanced a checkbook.


I've listened to a couple of financial gurus comment on the SVB collapse and they said the losses on SVB's long bonds/treasuries could have been easily protected with puts, they mentioned another strategy or two that could have also spread the risk but I don't recall what it was. The bottom line was the people running the bank were careless managing risk and the long bonds/treasuries getting crushed with rising interest rates became unmanageable.
Posted by the_truman_shitshow
Member since Aug 2021
2755 posts
Posted on 3/19/23 at 8:24 am to
Seriously? SVB collapse was planned as the sacrificial lamb to initiate the falling dominoes.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram