Started By
Message

re: When did Republicans stop caring about bodily autonomy?

Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:41 am to
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:41 am to
quote:

Do you not know the term social contract? Huh. I would have thought you'd know it at least minimally.

Does the Social Contract allow for killing inconvenient people?
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:41 am to
quote:

Are we talking about breastfeeding mothers?


Nah, wet nurses.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:42 am to
quote:

When did Republicans stop caring about bodily autonomy?


Never*


*except for pregnant women
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:42 am to
Just to restate

BamaAtl says
quote:

You want to answer the question?

Can the state force you to provide a kidney to transplant to an individual who is dying, provided you'll both live?


Answered

quote:

How is it you don't realize you're actually making OUR point?

Forget the state. Should YOU be able to kill me for my kidney so that you may live?

Then why can you just KILL a baby so that you may not be inconvenienced?

The state would not let you kill me for my kidney and, the argument here is, the state also should let you kill a baby so that you don't get inconvenienced
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21240 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:42 am to
quote:

Do you not know the term social contract? Huh. I would have thought you'd know it at least minimally.


Do you know how to answer questions? I would have thought you could, at the least, do that. Not surprised, you are a no talent arse clown. Need to break them chains off.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:42 am to
quote:

When “thou shalt not commit murder” began to make sense.


You guys are for the death penalty, too!

And more wars!

Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:43 am to
quote:

Are they 100% effective?


No but abstinence is.


Jesus would disagree.
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21240 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:43 am to
quote:

*except for pregnant women


Proof?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:43 am to
quote:

*except for pregnant women


Not allowing one person to kill another is respecting bodily autonomy.

No matter how desperately you try to contort
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62588 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:43 am to
quote:

Nah, wet nurses.
Yeah, because that's a thing in 21st century America
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
77250 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:43 am to
quote:

except for pregnant women


Now you're just saying shite because you heard Nancy Pelosi and Amy Schumer include that in their usual word vomit.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:43 am to
quote:

you're comparing one person's right to live v. the other's "right" to bodily autonomy


Yes, that is why I started the thread. Why do you want the state to dictate what an individual does with their body?
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21240 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:43 am to
quote:

Jesus would disagree.
Something you don't believe in. You're a special kind of stupid, aren't you?
Posted by 31TIGERS
Mike’s habitat
Member since Dec 2004
7219 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:43 am to
quote:

BamaAtl


You are low life filth. A useless and worthless S.O.A.B!! You’re a waste of flesh and oxygen. Worst of all, you’re a pile of shite liberal!
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62588 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Jesus would disagree.
Bamaatl is now saying that Christ should've been aborted
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Yes, that is why I started the thread. Why do you want the state to dictate what an individual does with their body?

She can do whatever the frick she likes with her body except for killing another individual.........who also.........interestingly enough......has a body!
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:45 am to
quote:

What is your definition of what is and isn't a person.


Viability outside the womb.

quote:

And what scientific evidence do you use to form your definition?


Evidence of ability to survive outside the womb.

quote:

Show me the science that says "A" is not a person but "B" is a person.


LINK
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
77250 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Jesus would disagree.


The Thou shalt not murder guy?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:46 am to
quote:

Viability outside the womb.

Hell, babies aren't viable outside the womb for quite some time on their own..........
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:46 am to
quote:

And yet the activity she chooses to engage in voluntarily (in 95%+ of abortions performed) is the ONE thing that results in pregnancy.


Does it always result in pregnancy? Do the steps commonly taken to prevent pregnancy work 100% of the time? What about in those cases where she didn't choose to participate in the action, but was forced into it (which the Alabama law does not distinguish between)?
Jump to page
Page First 20 21 22 23 24 ... 52
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 22 of 52Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram