Started By
Message

re: What's 38 trillion dollars? She Guverra calls it an "externality"

Posted on 9/18/18 at 7:42 pm to
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
7998 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

The term "externality" has a precise definition in economics and she used it correctly, believe it or not.

I'm not saying that I agree with her agenda, am just noting that she is using the correct language to describe her point. I doubt many know what a market externality is exactly, so maybe this will help.



Actually, no, she didn't. Those economic effects to which she referred can be (and are) fairly precisely factored into things like mortgage rates and other instruments of financial risk assessment.

She's thinks she's referring to distorted opportunity cost, but she did not fully flesh out her answer, and it's not necessarily distorted in the current environment.
This post was edited on 9/18/18 at 7:46 pm
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6495 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

38 trillion is not an externality as we live in a representative republic. Hence the voters actions are represented by their elected officals....and therefore goverment spending is NOT an externality




as we live in a representative republic, there would be a significant portion of representatives that do not chose to incur such costs. This makes it an externality. The term is correct, but that doesn't mean her argument is intelligent.
Posted by mofungoo
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2012
4583 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 7:58 pm to
quote:

Here is the only quote you need to know from that interview:

"A year ago, I was working downtown in a restaurant."



Well, she needs to go make me a sammich then.

MAGA
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram