Started By
Message

re: What does a secession actually look like?

Posted on 10/30/20 at 9:01 am to
Posted by Presidio
Member since Nov 2017
3060 posts
Posted on 10/30/20 at 9:01 am to
Yugoslavia

LINK
This post was edited on 10/30/20 at 9:02 am
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
73861 posts
Posted on 10/30/20 at 9:05 am to
quote:

What does a secession actually look like?



Posted by FearlessFreep
Baja Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
19475 posts
Posted on 10/30/20 at 9:05 am to
Probably the best possible scenario from a Trump victory would be a huge push for secession from the progressive side. They'll want to think it's "their" idea.

Ideally the country would eventually divide into five or six nation states along the major regions: NE/Rust Belt, SE, Northern Plains, Texas/Big West, and Pacific Coast/Hawaii. Alaska would be an independent nation, or possibly join Canada.

Theoretically this could be accomplished with little or no bloodshed, provided regional governments were willing to cooperate in mutual transfer of assets and a fair, equal division of military power. Trade agreements between regions could be worked out in advance.

Of course looking at our current crop of political leaders, the chance of this happening are virtually nonexistent.
This post was edited on 10/30/20 at 9:06 am
Posted by tjv305
Member since May 2015
12823 posts
Posted on 10/30/20 at 9:08 am to
I don’t think it works with out a civil war first . The easiest way would be for California , NY and the blue states around them to break off from the US. But we would still be stuck with a lot of liberals. We would have to make new voter laws to keep the country red and allow liberals to leave but not to enter with out giving up voting rights .I don’t think it would happen but I think it would be best for republicans to split the country and make all of the people who voted for democrat presidents recently to move to the New Democrat country . They should suffer with the rest of their kind . This country is screwed unless we have a civil war or breakup . We are going to become a socialist country.
Posted by keks tadpole
Yellow Leaf Creek
Member since Feb 2017
8454 posts
Posted on 10/30/20 at 9:09 am to
quote:

The United States gets the Military and the nukes.. Those who secede fight for their new country..

If the initial split is along red / blue state lines most of the military and land based nukes are in red states.
So is the United States the states that adhere to the values of the Constitution as written, or the states that consider the Constitution as a living document?
I see a civil war fought in a court room with a negotiated peace and reconstruction that gives more rights back to the individual states.
The question is how long will it take and how we treat the value of currency, considering the FED is an independent institution for the US Fed government.
I have thought for the last 12 years that a state needs in secret to have a contingency plan drawn up and ready for just such an event.
This post was edited on 10/30/20 at 9:13 am
Posted by RoyalAir
Detroit
Member since Dec 2012
7249 posts
Posted on 10/30/20 at 9:12 am to
quote:

Of course looking at our current crop of political leaders, the chance of this happening are virtually nonexistent.


And that's the rub. While an amicable divorce is the best possible outcome, that requires benevolent leadership. When you have people like Schumer, Blumenthal, Harris, and Hirono as senators, that benevolence is impossible. They actively hate the people with whom they disagree. When they regain power, they will transform into the people that they think Trump actually is.

These fricks love to project.
Posted by MykTide
Member since Jul 2012
26892 posts
Posted on 10/30/20 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

1BIGTigerFan


Aren’t you close to my age? And I’ve never been more alive !
Posted by Hobnailboot
Minneapolis
Member since Sep 2012
6094 posts
Posted on 10/30/20 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Bloody, very bloody.


I'd be happy to escort the blues to their new country peacefully.
Posted by Vestigial Morgan
Member since Apr 2016
3048 posts
Posted on 10/30/20 at 1:35 pm to
Well this will probably get a lot of downvotes but...we don't need a secession. A Pres that thought like Trump fought like Trump but did itv with the manner of Pence...would win 60% of the vote.

There are a decent amount of people that don't want a pres that has public feuds. I don't care that he called Rosie O Donnell a fat pig but my wife and SIL do. Even if they don't care one iota for Rosie. Having been married 3x and several affairs...sort of like that saying "i don't care how much you know till I know how much you care"..therev are millions of voters that would say "i cant care about your policies because....I cant care about you" ( not that they like Biden either)

Posted by 1BIGTigerFan
100,000 posts
Member since Jan 2007
55112 posts
Posted on 10/30/20 at 3:42 pm to
Are you replying across boards?



This post was edited on 10/30/20 at 3:43 pm
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
45193 posts
Posted on 10/30/20 at 4:19 pm to
A state peacefully exiting the US =/= a mess. Texas isn’t looking to secede en masse; rather, the discussion is: The state goes alone.

That’s certainly not to say Texas doesn’t support others looking to do the same, just that TEXIT isn’t a joint venture.

—————

From the Texas Nationalist Movement: LINK ]What is TEXIT?

There is no existing statutory framework in Texas law specifically for conducting an independence referendum. There doesn’t have to be. All the pieces are currently there. They just have to be assembled in the one place where it matters: The Texas Legislature.

This comes in the form of a standard bill. It’s important to note that the Texas Legislature is a true part-time legislative body. They meet for exactly 140 days every other year unless called into a special session by the governor.


1. The Texas Independence Referendum Act is a piece of proposed legislation that will give Texans the ability to vote on becoming an independent, self-governing, nation-state. The most comprehensive piece of self-determination legislation ever introduced in any state of the United States, it is modeled after the UK Referendum Act and the Scottish Referendum Act.

Legislation to initiate a TEXIT referendum is incredibly simple and ready to file. LINK ]Click for text of the legislation.


2. Since the threshold to win a TEXIT vote is a simple majority, it will take 50 percent plus 1 of those who cast a vote in the referendum.


3. Will the federal government use military force to stop TEXIT? Imagine the scenario. Fifteen million Texans have gone to the polls and voted in a free, fair, and open referendum, conducted under the laws of the State of Texas, and have chosen, by a majority vote, to leave the Union and assert Texas’ status as a free and independent self-governing nation-state .... read more: LINK ]Texas Nationalist Movement


4. What will happen immediately after a TEXIT vote? Contrary to the doomsday predictions of those who oppose TEXIT, in the immediate aftermath of an affirmative Texas independence vote, things continue as they have until they don’t. The mail gets delivered. The trash gets picked up. Goods flow. Money is earned and spent. Literally, nothing changes until it does.

There should be one single aim for relations with the United States in the immediate aftermath of TEXIT: minimizing disruption. While those opposed to TEXIT would love to think that disruption cannot be avoided or even mitigated as Texas leaves the Union, they are dead wrong. In fact, the tools necessary to effect a speedy, efficient, and minimally disruptive TEXIT are already at our disposal.

This post was edited on 10/30/20 at 6:10 pm
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112261 posts
Posted on 10/30/20 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

who gets the military? Who gets the nukes?


Well...considering the Libs/Progs hate the military and are no nuke advocates, I think the right thing to do is for the Red States to take them off their hands
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
45193 posts
Posted on 10/30/20 at 4:42 pm to
Texas has 25 military bases and the only nuclear assembly plant in the United States in its borders. It’s also the only state with its own Air Force, to say nothing of the National Guard. I believe 15% of currently enlisted US soldiers come from Texas.

Texas may not initially stand much of a chance in a conventional war vs the US, but that's not how secession would transpire anyway. It would be peaceful. Many countries with militaries far smaller than Texas’s exist fine, without incident.
Posted by Army Frog Fan
Member since Jun 2013
78 posts
Posted on 10/30/20 at 4:48 pm to
The Second Civil War would look like the first Gulf War, where one side has no shot and the good guys win in a few days.
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
45193 posts
Posted on 10/30/20 at 4:54 pm to
Why?
Posted by Tigerhalen
Member since May 2020
982 posts
Posted on 10/30/20 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

Ideally the country would eventually divide into five or six nation states along the major regions: NE/Rust Belt, SE, Northern Plains, Texas/Big West, and Pacific Coast/Hawaii. Alaska would be an independent nation, or possibly join Canada.


Why would we do this when a vast majority of the land is “red?”
Posted by keks tadpole
Yellow Leaf Creek
Member since Feb 2017
8454 posts
Posted on 10/30/20 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

2. Since the threshold to win a TEXIT vote is a simple majority, it will take 50 percent plus 1 of those who cast a vote in the referendum.

Here's the catch that I have never seen anyone take into consideration:
The IRS and Social Security could make exiting feasible.
The vote to leave is a secret ballot.
That doesn't mean you have to give up your US citizenship, even if you voted to exit.
Granted the State may require sole citizenship for public office or public service positions, but everyone else becomes at expat.
Retired? S.S. check still comes in the mail.
US taxes? Irs has rules for it, but you start paying well into upper five figures.
Population on US federal programs? No programs. Work, starve or move.
To keep the aforementioned exodus in check, an exited state my get a mountain of foreign aid. Look at how many billions we dump into S-hole countries on the other side of the Earth.
As long as your State has a decent GDP based on demand for goods people need, it would be a challenge but doable.
Just have to make a plan and be first, before everyone else catches on.
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
45193 posts
Posted on 10/30/20 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

As long as your State has a decent GDP based on demand for goods people need, it would be a challenge but doable.

Fair point.
From Wikipedia:
LINK ]Economy of Texas
quote:

As a sovereign country (2016), Texas would be the 10th largest economy in the world by GDP (ahead of South Korea and Canada)
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram