Started By
Message

re: Venezuela reality- it ain't drugs, it's China

Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:32 pm to
Posted by BabyDraco1499
Hellexandria
Member since Nov 2025
818 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:32 pm to
Genuinely a fair assumption. It really is. But isn’t making a stand against it and targeting as an enemy psychologically more beneficial than doing nothing?
Posted by BabyDraco1499
Hellexandria
Member since Nov 2025
818 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:33 pm to
You’re genuinely and wholesale wrong. Where does the supply come from? Domestically? Or internationally? Why are you defending it?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
296529 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:34 pm to
quote:

You’re genuinely and wholesale wrong.


It the laws of economics. Where there is money, people will take risks.

Posted by BabyDraco1499
Hellexandria
Member since Nov 2025
818 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:35 pm to
So by your standard, wherever the money is, legally, morally, ethically, it should be allowed? Correct? By any means necessary
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
25291 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:36 pm to
quote:

If that's the theory, that's fine.

But anybody who claims Trump is against Deep State ops can't really accept that theory, can they?

The theory is basically that Trump is starting a proxy Cold War against China like we did the USSR.

Which gave us Korea, Vietnam, the AfghanSoviet-War, The Angolan Civil War, The Chinese Civil War in the 40s, The Greek Civil War, The Nicaraguan Revolution and the Congo Crisis.

I am a lot more accepting of those sort of ops than Trump populists, who run around screaming "Muh 'Merca 'Fust" when any sort of American support or intervention is even mentioned. If anybody other than Trump mentions it, that is. If it's Nikki Haley or Ted Cruz or anybody else, they are trying to start WWIII for profit, in league with the Dreaded Globalist Joo Illuminati.

When Trump actually does it the board cheers.

Populism is moronic. Sorry, but it is.

well said
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
296529 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:38 pm to
quote:


So by your standard, wherever the money is, legally, morally, ethically, it should be allowed?


Thats dumb.

You cant win the war without attacking the demand side of drugs. We've fought supply for 6 decades, and drugs are everywhere. New, dangerous synthetic drugs.
Posted by Warboo
Enterprise Alabama
Member since Sep 2018
5560 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:38 pm to
quote:

It the laws of economics. Where there is money, people will take risks.


They will take risks if the rewards are there. It works both ways Roger, economically speaking.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
296529 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:39 pm to
quote:



They will take risks if the rewards are there. It works both ways Roger, economically speaking.


Yep, and the pie is 100B plus. There is no end to the lengths people will go to get their part.
Posted by BabyDraco1499
Hellexandria
Member since Nov 2025
818 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:40 pm to
So why are we arguing? You end the supply the ability to gain, treat the demand, and win the war. Am I wrong? It isn’t a domestic problem. That’s been known since the 90’s. So what is the issue?
Posted by BabyDraco1499
Hellexandria
Member since Nov 2025
818 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:41 pm to
But that’s what you just said? So why not cut off the supply? Once the supply is ended, you treat the demand. This isn’t a A and B thing. B needs A. Once you eliminate the supply you can TREAT the issue.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
296529 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

So why not cut off the supply?


A new supply will pop up overnight. Its the money driving the market.
Posted by Warboo
Enterprise Alabama
Member since Sep 2018
5560 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

Yep, and the pie is 100B plus. There is no end to the lengths people will go to get their part.


It appears so, the videos show that. Eventually, the imminent death by drone to the dome will get the message across. There is a saying Roger, repeatedly doing something that fails is the definition of insanity.
Posted by BabyDraco1499
Hellexandria
Member since Nov 2025
818 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:45 pm to
Again, why not make it more cost to deliver than to profit? Like this isn’t even a conversation? Make a fortress, eliminate the thought of bringing it in, and treat the issues internally? I feel like we’re agreeing. The issues will ALWAYS be present. But why not make the cost worth more than the profit? I’m genuinely asking
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
296529 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:46 pm to
quote:


It appears so, the videos show that. Eventually, the imminent death by drone to the dome will get the message across


They;ll just move production to this side of the border where folks have constitutional protections.

Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
296529 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

why not make it more cost to deliver than to profit?


The more money involved, the more players will be in the game. Its self defeating.
Posted by Warboo
Enterprise Alabama
Member since Sep 2018
5560 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

A new supply will pop up overnight. Its the money driving the market.


Your stance is that if there are criminals doing bad things there is no reason to stop them as there will be more criminals to replace the ones we just stopped. Do you not see how crazy your thought on this is? Do you not realize that you are propping up the liberal lefts ideals on this?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
296529 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:51 pm to
quote:



Your stance is that if there are criminals doing bad things there is no reason to stop them as there will be more criminals to replace the ones we just stopped.


No, you can stop them, but new ones immediately take their place.

Reduce the money in the game, reduce the players. If we're serious we would attack demand.
Posted by Warboo
Enterprise Alabama
Member since Sep 2018
5560 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

Reduce the money in the game, reduce the players. If we're serious we would attack demand.


I want you to read what you just posted. You are agreeing with this administration. It burns I know, it will be ok.
Posted by Speckhunter2012
Lake Charles
Member since Dec 2012
8155 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:57 pm to
quote:


MAGA don't need no facts, just think what lord Trump tells them to think


Idiot. True to your nature, though.

There is so much more going in with VZ that a simple mind like yours cannot even fathom.

From emptying their prisons, asylums and sending gang members here at the invite of your potus, *biden. To connections to drug cartels, to terrorist organizations and countries hell bent on destroying the US and the West.

There is even the fringe aspects of the Dominion voting machines, which BTW, PDJT said we will be seeing the evidence of the BS of 2020 shortly. Add in this column, the alphabet agency that is known by the left and the right to deal in drugs from places like Afghanistan, for off the books money to fund their Color Revolutions and regime changes that you did not seem to bitch about during O's and *bidens terms. Hmmmmm

Go ahead and follow the lead from the fake news. "He's shooting fishermen just trying to make a living."
Posted by BabyDraco1499
Hellexandria
Member since Nov 2025
818 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 8:00 pm to
So do what? Nothing?
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram