re: Trump reportedly will hire Laura Loomer to a Campaign role

quote:

---

And folks think he can win the general. I'll vote for him but it's not happening

---

Well when it’s his own party trashing him the most and as often as possible insisting and promoting the narrative that he can’t win the general, yeah, that creates quite a challenge. All these folks who claim to be Republicans and are arguing so vehemently that he can’t win, and making their final predictions of him being trounced by whoever the Democrat nominee may be…….you think all those Republicans are hoping to be proven correct by him losing? I think they are. And that is what is clown world, right there. A nice chunk of the Republican Party is hoping he were to lose. That’s the most significant factor itself.

quote:

---

Well when it’s his own party trashing him the most and as often as possible insisting and promoting the narrative that he can’t win the general, yeah, that creates quite a challenge.

---

You're not wrong but wouldn't that same argument track for DeSantis?

quote:

---

All these folks who claim to be Republicans and are arguing so vehemently that he can’t win, and making their final predictions of him being trounced by whoever the Democrat nominee may be…….you think all those Republicans are hoping to be proven correct by him losing?

---

Maybe I'm wrong but I think very, very few of Republicans who post here would want Trump to lose the election if he was the nominee in 2024. I think those of us who support someone else this time would happily vote for Trump if he won the nomination. Can the same be said about Trump first supporters if DeSantis won? Personally if someone like Haley won I would write in Rand Paul but if Trump beats DeSantis I would happily vote for Trump.

quote:

---

I don’t necessarily see the level and extent of people on “the other side” being so openly eager and expressive in the notion that “he has no shot at winning.” I just think this is a major problem. For what it’s worth, I think anyone on either “side” who asserts that they’d not vote for the other is utterly foolish to think in such a way.

---

I agree with you on the foolishness thing and I'm glad we agree. At the same time I raise you JJdoc, and I know there is at least one DeSantis supporter who frequently posts here, who I can't recall because I got off at 12 today and have been drinking since, who refuses to vote for Trump. I hate loyalty to any single politician and as long as you don't conflict with my fundamental political beliefs I'll vote for you - even if you weren't my preferred choice.

Sadly, it doesn’t matter who he hires, the odds point to the fact that at some point Trump will isolate them, trash them, make fun of them or simply not listen to them, ending in yet another disgruntled employee leaking information to the Washington Compost and the New York Slimes

NARCISSIST

He does stupid shite like this but y’all want to cry about “muh fraud“ when he gets trounced.

This lady has zero appeal to most people who decide elections and is most likely going to actively turn people off the more she speaks.

Over/ under 90 days until Nick Fuentes gets a position?

quote:

---

That’s the laziest, least credible of all “criticisms.”

---

It's 100% accurate.

quote:

---

It's 100% accurate.

---

My wish for you is that you’d just not say anything. How unselfish of me that it’s your wellbeing I’m most concerned with at this time, and not some senseless damaging blow in return.

quote:

---

End then MAGA will say Trump's a genius for firing her.

---

"She was a terrible person. But it was 4D chess to hire her". Same thnig they say about every other loser he's hired then fired.

GFY

If we went back about 3 or 4 years in your post archives and looked in a thread involving a story created by New York Times; and the topic of conversation at the time was whether the article was intended to instigate questioning and doubt amongst the right over/about Trump’s decision making skills; and of particular interest was that the article cited unnamed sources:

Would we find that you accepted it wholeheartedly without skepticism, with its unnamed sources? Or would we more likely find that you had a healthy amount of skepticism and distrust (mostly due to that having been attempted on you 10 times that week) and concluded that the article was hilariously obvious in its manipulation and “fake news”? I have my guess.

Where did that Taxing Authority go? Dig deep and find him, and bring him to me. Because I need to hash some things out. How have so many people with once strong instincts for screening the bullshite become so defeated in spirit? Maybe there’s a seed of truth and fact to this, but ultimately the same old story……5% accurate, 95% manipulation.