Started By
Message

re: They are starting WW III for

Posted on 3/1/25 at 9:01 am to
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10447 posts
Posted on 3/1/25 at 9:01 am to
quote:

I bet you guys blame Poland for starting WWII.


Not only that, but someone will jump in at some point and start telling us that Hitler wasn't really all that bad.

3...2...1...
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10447 posts
Posted on 3/1/25 at 9:09 am to
quote:

I’m absolutely certain they would have


Eventually they would have developed nuclear weapons.

And if you don't think Hitler would have used them, and if you don't think he would never have stopped until he ruled the whole world, I don't know what to tell you.

Imagine if Nazi Germany had acquired nukes first, while we were sitting on our asses. It's very probable that we would have been attacked. Not until Hitler owned all of Europe first, sure. But that wouldn't have taken but a few atom bombs to accomplish.

I like you as a poster and we agree on many things.

But isolationism is just actively, willfully stupid.

The closest parallel is the people who still advocate for communism even though it's never succeeded, (because THIS time we'll do it right.)

In both cases human nature makes them both impossible, and simple observation should reveal that as an obvious fact.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram