re: The True History of the Jonestown Cult, WWII, and How Winston Churchill Ruined Europe

And yet here you are, upset that someone dared to question the orthodoxy, working double time to stamp out wrong think

quote:

---

Hitler was eager to make peace with the UK. The terms would probably have been generous.

---

Does he have primary documents to support this or is it supposition?

quote:

---

And yet here you are, upset that someone dared to question the orthodoxy, working double time to stamp out wrong think

---

You claimed the topic was taboo and the best example you can come up with is someone poking holes in the "Hitler was actually the good guy" "I'm just asking questions" thread? Shouldn't a "taboo" topic have real world consequences?

Candace "I'm not allowed to talk about this" Owens routinely talks about the things she's not allowed to talk about and she's getting rich in the process. But it's a "taboo" topic.

quote:

---

Just look at all the attacks they are getting from the guardians of the narrative.

---

Are you not a guardian of a narrative?

The point still stands though. If the topic isn't allowed to be discussed, doesn't the fact that it was discussed openly and promoted by the owner of Twitter disprove that the topic is verboten? Just because people are disagreeing and making those disagreements public doesn't suddenly make Tucker and Darryl victims.

Like I said earlier, and your post above proves this, claiming something is off limits or taboo or whatever is just a way to insulate yourself from any dissenting opinion. You consider people who disagree with you to be either fooled by someone or to be in on the conspiracy. You would never take any disagreement in good faith.

quote:

---

You claimed the topic was taboo and the best example you can come up with is someone poking holes in the "Hitler was actually the good guy" "I'm just asking questions" thread? Shouldn't a "taboo" topic have real world consequences?

Candace "I'm not allowed to talk about this" Owens routinely talks about the things she's not allowed to talk about and she's getting rich in the process. But it's a "taboo" topic.

---

Are you being willfully obtuse?

All of this talk is illegal in Europe and you’ll go to prison.

In the US, while not illegal, it has historically been enough to ruin your career. It is not something that would have ever been allowed on any television programs. Really, it’s only very recently and primarily due to a shift in access largely because of twitter and TikTok, that it’s getting widely discussed. You could find stuff like this on 4chan, but most people don’t go there and you have to have enough sense from a lot of time spent there to navigate what has grains of truth between the countless trolls and intel ops.

And you see the reaction to the very recent availability of information to these topics at a large scale. The government of the US, which has a supposed first amendment, votes to ban TikTok. And now there are open calls to reign in Musk for Twitter and saying he’s a larger threat than Russia, and the NYT saying maybe the constitution is a mistake.

But sure, anyone can talk about this stuff and we’re the paranoid ones. Get your bullshite out of here, people have had enough of it.

quote:

---

There had been a declaration of war for nearly two years.

---

How does that take anything from what I said? What had Britain lost? Why could peace talks not lead to favorable results when they weren’t even actively fighting?

There are many sources on Hitler not having any serious beef with the British and being very pissed Churchill continued to escalate. What is your primary reason for not believing this?

I have not either. I have no reason to believe, based on the other things I said, they would be unreasonable

But the biggest and most glaring reason they should have accepted peace is the fact it was literally impossible for them to achieve a victory without the United States, who at the time was not their ally. And wasn’t one for another year and a half.

How can you justify “bargaining” when you have no chips? Churchill was bloodthirsty and we should have never been in the war, and we wouldn’t have been had it not been for him and his mind numbing stubbornness and deceit.

Dunkirk happened in May, and then the Germans didn’t attack again until September after repeated bombing raids by Britain. Why could peace not have happened in that period?

So proud of TC to have Darryl on his podcast. Love more and more people are waking up to the realization so much of what you’ve been told about the last 100 years historically is fake and gay. it’s way past time the history brokers who’ve controlled the narratives get exposed as the frauds they are.