
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Man From Mars Investigates the 1980's (Long)
Posted on 9/17/26 at 8:36 am
Posted on 9/17/26 at 8:36 am
Longtime WSJ Editorial Page Editor Robert Bartley penned a book, The Seven Fat Years, that was an economic defense of the 1980's. Great book. He published the first half of the first chapter as a column in the WSJ and frankly, it's one of his better ones. I'm re-reading the book right now and thought I'd put up his column here as it can not be found online. The column's title was "The Man from Mars."
quote:
In July 1990, the Seven Fat Years ended. An economic expansion of record peacetime duration ground to a close.
That summer, too, the Man from Mars landed in Kankakee and began to watch television programs, browse in bookstores and listen in on daily chatter. The shopping malls were air-conditioned; the parking lots were filled with cars shipped from far-off Japan; the movie house offered a choice of five attractions; what used to be record shops sold "music videos" by Madonna and Milli Vanilli; and kids in the mall wore $100 sneakers.
Yet everywhere he heard and read of economic decline. Everyone talked of "excesses." Best-selling books mocked recent history, depicting the follies of tycoons, elaborating on the poor sinking into deeper misery and bemoaning the decline of the nation. The impending recession was the start, everyone seemed to assume, of the collapse the Cassandras had predicted throughout the 92 months of economic expansion.
No one could see any economic statistic except the "deficit," a kind of black hole into which vanished the savings of all America and maybe the world. The corner savings and loan has somehow mutated into the eggplant that ate Kankakee, Tampa and Los Angeles. America had become a "debtor nation" and was declining as previous empires had. Whole companies had been financed on "junk." The financial genius of the preceding decade was headed for jail, and the huge financial firm built around him was bankrupt.
Most curiously of all, in all this the Man from Mars sensed a peculiar satisfaction. The country was leaving behind a "decade of greed." The time had come to atone our sins, his most fashionable interlocutors seemed to feel. Seven lean years would be good for us. It was as if part of the American soul wanted a recession. This was our nervous breakdown; we had earned it, and we were going to enjoy it.
Disoriented by the disjunction between the affluence he saw and the poor-mouthing he heard, the Man from Mars pulled out his hand-held Databoy, and started to query for some statistics.
ECONOMIC GROWTH?, he punched. In 1990, the Databoy screen said, the gross national product of America was 31 percent above 1982 in real, inflation-adjusted terms. During the Seven Fat Years, America had grown by nearly a third.At the beginning of the period, the German economy was about a third of America's; in its years of "excess" the American economic machine had in effect built a whole new West Germany.
LIVING STANDARDS?, the Man from Mars punched. Inevitably the economic expansion had affected individual Americans. The Databoy exhibited the best measure of standard of living, something economists called real disposable income per capita. As expansion ended in 1990, this was 18 percent above 1982. Over the Seven Fat Years, that is, the standard of living of the American people grew by nearly a fifth. At least, the Man from Mars thought, this explains the $100 sneakers.
How?, he punched, pressing for elaboration. The growth happened because the expansion was a long one, he learned, and powers of compound interest do wonders in a long run of uninterrupted growth. The Databoy said the expansion started at an economic trough in the final quarter of 1982 and reached its peak in the third quarter of 1990. Over this time, real gross national product grew by 32 percent.
DEINDUSTRIALIZATION?, the Man from Mars punched, picking something he'd heard. He found that manufacturing production grew even faster than GNP, rising by 48 percent over the expansion. And despite the deficit black hole, gross private investment grew by 32 percent, in line with GNP. And just as a demographic surge reached working age, enough jobs were created to boost civilian employment by 19.5 percent. Between 1982 and 1990, the U.S. economy added 18.4 million jobs.
PRODUCTIVITY?, he continued. During all that "excess," nonfarm productivity, the output of an hour of American labor, grew by 10.6 percent, though it had previously been stagnant for a decade. And while the interlocutors bemoaned "noncompetitive" industries, exports to the rest of the world grew by 92.6 percent.¹
GREED, he typed, DECADE OF? No statistics on greed, the Databoy replied, reference CHARITY? Here he found that the 1980s were a remarkably generous decade, with charitable giving growing at 5.1 percent a year, compared with a rate of 3.5 percent over the previous 25 years. Giving increased faster than jewelry purchases, beauty parlor and health club spending and consumer debt. ²
TAX REVENUES? This time the Man from Mars was sure he'd find a catch, having heard again and again of "irresponsible" tax cuts. The Databoy replied that between fiscal years 1980 and 1990, federal government receipts grew by 99 percent, against GNP growth of 102 percent. From the low point in 1983 to the high point in 1989, the figures showed, tax receipts actually grew faster than GNP.
CHART, U.S. ECONOMY, the Man from Mars punched into the Databoy, CRUDE. It told him that as the expansion began, the crudest measure of economic progress was something called a "misery index," offered by the late Arthur Okun, the Brookings Institution economist. It was simply the sum of the inflation rate and unemployment rate. The data base offered up a chart. It showed that the misery index had been at a peak when the Seven Fat Years started, and declined until they came to an end.
Taking one glance at the misery index, the Man from Mars punched, CHART, U.S. ECONOMY, INFLECTION POINTS. Yes, it told him, there had been a discontinuity in the growth path of the U.S. economy, but it had come before the years of "excess." From World War II until 1973, real economic growth averaged 3.6 percent a year. After 1973 the economy staggered, growing only 1.6 percent a year over the next nine years. But after 1982, growth returned, hitting a 3.5 percent path through 1990. From the beginning of 1983 through the end of 1989, growth hit 3.8 percent—The Seven Fat Years.
SEE FOOTNOTE, the Databoy screen flashed, INFLECTION POINTS. There is a convention among economists to measure different economic periods peak-to-peak or trough-to-trough. By their nature, inflection points measure peak-to-trough or trough-to-peak. The usual convention is "fair," but doesn't help much with the issue of what causes peaks and what causes troughs. Sometimes inflection points will help show when things changed.
Yes, the Man from Mars thought, to glance at these charts, something changed in 1973 and in 1983. While I know little about the partisan and ideological battles of Earthlings, something caused a flattening and something caused a revival.It probably takes a while to work out policies, and anyway economists talk of lags, so maybe the crucial times were a year or two before the chart's inflection points.
This post was edited on 9/17/26 at 9:36 am
Posted on 9/17/26 at 8:36 am to prplhze2000
quote:
Marking this thought as something to return to, the Man from Mars punched, U.S. ECONOMY, RELATIVE POSITION? The United States, it told him, was the wealthiest society on earth, indeed the wealthiest society in the history of mankind.
SEE FOOTNOTE, the Databoy instructed, PURCHASING POWER PARITY. It's hard to compare the wealth of different societies on earth, he learned, because they all measure things in different monies. And these yardsticks keep changing size in relation to each other—and unfortunately, experience seems to show, not in line with any underlying economic fundamentals. Comparisons require something called Purchasing Power Parity, the exchange rate at which two currencies would each buy the same basket of goods. Fortunately, this figure is churned out in tedious work by something called the OECD, or Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Since about 1985, it turns out, market exchange rates for the dollar have been far below PPP rates, so that comparisons built on current exchange rates show America falling behind. But adjusting the comparisons to PPP, as economists agree must be done in comparing standards of living, makes the picture entirely different.
In a typical comparison using 1988 figures and contemporary exchange rates, the United States ranked only ninth in the world in gross domestic product per capita—behind Switzerland, Japan and the Scandinavian countries, for example.But if you use PPP exchange rates, the American standard of living is far above its main competitors. With the United States at 100, Canada rates 92.5 and Switzerland 87.0. Then come the Scandinavian nations and some small nations, in 1988 including Kuwait. West Germany rates tenth at 78.6, and Japan 12th at 71.5. Other developed nations trail. In short, the American standard of living is about 40 percent above that in Japan and most of Europe. ³
This is confirmed by physical measures. Americans own an automobile, for example, for every 1.8 persons. Iceland has two people for each car, while Canada, New Zealand and West Germany have 2.2. France has 2.5, the United Kingdom 2.8 and Japan 4.2. Similarly, there are 1.2 Americans per television set, compared to 1.7 in Japan and 2.4 in Germany.The United States is also one of the world's great underdeveloped countries, with 26.3 persons per square mile, compared to 102.1 in France, 233.8 in the United Kingdom, 246.1 in West Germany, 324.5 in Japan, and 395.8 in the Netherlands. In terms of gross economic power, the United States economy was 70 percent larger than the second-place Japanese economy even at exchange rates current in 1988.
MILITARY POWER?, the Man from Mars queried, wondering if he had wandered into a Sybaris sinking in its own luxury and threatened by poorer but more vigorous rivals. Instead, he learned that a two-generation military rival had collapsed at a stroke, leaving the United States as the world's sole superpower. Shortly into his visit, he witnessed its warriors decimate the world's fifth-largest army in 100 hours of ground combat and at the cost of 124 Americans lost in action.
See, the computer instucted, related items:
IDEOLOGICAL POWER? The American ideas of democratic pluralism and market economies were spreading throughout South America, Eastern Europe and even Africa. America remains the favored destination of the world's refugees and immigrants.
TECHNOLOGICAL POWER? Despite challenges from the industrious Japanese, America still dominates scientific innovation. Its university system is unparalleled. While it educates many foreign nationals, many of them stay in the United States. Many transnational corporations, even if based in Germany or Switzerland, locate their research divisions in New Jersey or North Carolina. Japanese auto companies open design labs in Los Angeles. Above all, the United States utterly dominates the single capstone technology of the era, which despite the plethora of earth languages is in every country called "software.
The Man from Mars, by now at wits' end to understand, wants only the outcome. PROSPECTS?, he queries. The Databoy turns terse: Limitless. Theirs to grasp, and theirs to drop.
This post was edited on 9/17/26 at 8:38 am
Posted on 9/17/26 at 9:38 am to prplhze2000
What's your point? Culturally and politically, the 80's were great. Economically, the latter part of the 80's were pretty rough in Texas. Oil was taking a beating and the biggest real estate crash since the Great Depression had kicked off.
Posted on 9/17/26 at 9:50 am to Gunny Hartman
It's a great column that succinctly defends the 1980's.
The 80's have been getting trashed lately from J.D. Vance to Ryan Reynolds. Right now we are experiencing a bit of our own stagflation as well. Not many defend the 80's anymore or I should say, the economics that created the 80's.
The 80's have been getting trashed lately from J.D. Vance to Ryan Reynolds. Right now we are experiencing a bit of our own stagflation as well. Not many defend the 80's anymore or I should say, the economics that created the 80's.

Popular
Back to top
2







