re: The implications of the forced gay marriage legislation

quote:

---

The fact that there are men on earth who are sexually attracted to other men bothers you. This is because you are a weak man. I would label it a feminine quality, but that would insult women in an unfair way.

---

The fact is what bothers me is that you are so stupid you can't have an intelligent debate on the subject and instead have to insult me in your lame attempt to try to intimidate me into shutting up about my personal opinion regarding same sex marriage and homosexuality.

Go find your boyfriend then the two of you can go frick yourselves!

quote:

---

Same sex unions are as old as marriage itself.

---

No, they're not. Though I sense the parsing is creeping in to your language here. Is homosexuality old? Yup. Is homosexual marriage? Nope. And citing some obscure book that can't even merit a review written by a gay activist isn't going to win the argument.

quote:

---

Oof. The gun in your holster is my typo? I gotta say, it's typical of you, and if you were in a debate with my cactus, it'd be a pick 'em.

---

You are so stupid and lazy that you didn't even make sure that you spelled "same sex" correctly.

That's pretty funny to me.

BTW, I'd tell you to stick your cactus up your arse but there isn't any room for it because your head is already in there.

You are lashing out because I have pointed out to you on a publicly-accessible message board that you are a man so weak that you are actually bothered by the fact that there are men everywhere who are sexually attracted to other men and enjoy having sex with other men. You are ashamed because you are being judged—accurately—as weak. You cannot stop thinking about men having sex with men. It is on your mind constantly. It dominates you. You are trying in vain to frame it as someone else's problem, but deep down you know that it is yours.

quote:

---

You are lashing out because I have pointed out to you on a publicly-accessible message board that you are a man so weak that you are actually bothered by the fact that there are men everywhere who are sexually attracted to other men and enjoy having sex with other men. You are ashamed because you are being judged—accurately—as weak. You cannot stop thinking about men having sex with men. It is on your mind constantly. It dominates you. You are trying in vain to frame it as someone else's problem, but deep down you know that it is yours.

---

quote:

---

It bothers you.

---

Lies bother me.
Inaccuracy with an agenda bothers me.
Gay doesn't bother me.

And now that you've moved to the personal, I'll assume you have exactly as much evidence for your statements as you have herein elucidated.

I am pro gay marriage. But you are an idiot. Have you read the ruling out of Louisiana? Please point out where his constitutional analysis was incorrect.

quote:

---

Social, financial, sexual unions between people are as old as civilization itself, and it has always been so that some of those unions have been between people who are of the same sex, a

---

Now the parsing has begun in earnest. A social union of same sex people is commonly known as friendship. A financial union of same sex people is known as a contract. A sexual union of same sex people is known as homosexuality. None of those encompass marriage. You're spewing propagandist garbage and hoping some of it sticks. You're clever enough to willfully lie and hope it influences. Lies always lose in the end. And they will in your life. Best of luck to you.

quote:

---

Have you read the ruling out of Louisiana? Please point out where his constitutional analysis was incorrect.

---

Happily. There are many things the judge (Feldman) says that are factually incorrect.

quote:

---

No authority dictates, and plaintiffs do not contend, that same-sex marriage is anchored to history or tradition.

---

This judge could do five minutes of research and find that same sex marriage has been around for millennia. It isn't the most common thing in the world, and it isn't the type of thing about which most cultures throughout history have been particularly open, but this part of the decision is just not correct.

quote:

---

It would no doubt be celebrated to be in the company of the near-unanimity of the many other federal courts that have spoken to this pressing issue, if this Court were confident in the belief that those cases provide a correct guide.

---

This one is funny, especially given your question to me. You ask me to show where this one judge is wrong, and this judge's decision states an opinion that the 20 or so judges who have ruled against same sex marriage bans are wrong. I'm not one to use the made-up bullshite term "activist judge," but if I were, it would be well-applied here. When one judge issues a ruling stating that a classroom full of judges were dead wrong on an issue, forgive me for thinking that the one judge has a bullshite agenda.

quote:

---

Perhaps, in the wake of today's blurry notion of evolving understanding, the result is ordained. Perhaps in a new established point of view, marriage will be reduced to contract law, and, by contract, anyone will be able to claim marriage. Perhaps that is the next frontier, the next phase of some "evolving understanding of equality," where what is marriage will be explored.

---

Isn't it already? Virtually all the anti-same sex marriage crowd is in favor of civil unions not called "marriage," and they claim that these contracts will carry the same protections as marriage licenses.

quote:

---

N/A

---

I can't find it in there--forgive me--but the ruling says something to the effect of the 14th Amendment saying that racial discrimination is Constitutionally evil. The Amendment does not mention race, nor does it mention sexuality. Either the judge has grossly misread the Amendment, or there is a bullshite agenda afoot.

quote:

---

For example, must the states permit or recognize a marriage between an aunt and niece? Aunt and nephew? Brother/brother? Father and child? May minors marry?

---

Of course not. Due process is not violated by preventing marriages/contracts between these sets of parties. Why do I know this and this judge doesn't? This is perhaps the most ridiculous piece of this ruling.

Il y a beaucoup de raisons to question this ruling, sir.

You requested. I granted.

quote:

---

But you are an idiot.

---

Suck my balls, prick.

quote:

---

Man you are incredibly emotional about this.

---

I suppose I could be. I guess I hold the Constitution in a higher regard than people like you and our current President do. ;)