- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Strzok bias question
Posted on 7/12/18 at 1:35 pm to GeeOH
Posted on 7/12/18 at 1:35 pm to GeeOH
quote:
He shouldn't be involved in an investigation of that candidate who recieved never before heard of preferential treatment in her being "questioned".
I assume you researched this and didn't just make this up.
But the point is you're creating an absurd standard that doesn't apply to anyone else. Do you really believe that high level professional people can't put personal opinions aside and do their jobs? You really believe that FBI agents, lawyers, judges, etc.. don't text with co-workers/colleagues/friends about their opinions of the matters they're working on? That's super (conveniently) naive man.
Do you really believe lawyers haven't texted friends that they "hate their client" and still went out and did the best job they could on behalf of that client?
This post was edited on 7/12/18 at 1:43 pm
0
Posted on 7/12/18 at 1:36 pm to jchamil
quote:
Well, there is evidence straight from the horse's mouth that Strzok's bias would affect his decisions in investigating Trump.
There is?
Posted on 7/12/18 at 1:38 pm to jbgleason
It's weird. It seems the left believes Trump's comments on the campaign trail should be used against him in his travel ban case (all 4 liberal judges on SCOTUS using that reasoning to rule against him,) yet the lead investigators at the FBI being openly pro-Clinton/anti-Trump had no impact, whatsoever, on everybody involved in Clinton's felonies being granted immunity or the creation of the Trump-Russia investigation/Mueller special counsel.
I mean, didn't the Trump-Russia investigation/Mueller special counsel originate from a dossier compiled by a foreign national at the behest of the Clinton campaign (isn't that... collusion) as well as the FBI (isn't that also... collusion?) Kind of weird that it's 'opposition research' when Democrats conspire with foreign nationals to win elections, but it's downright 'treason' and 'illegal collusion' when Republicans are even accused.
I mean, didn't the Trump-Russia investigation/Mueller special counsel originate from a dossier compiled by a foreign national at the behest of the Clinton campaign (isn't that... collusion) as well as the FBI (isn't that also... collusion?) Kind of weird that it's 'opposition research' when Democrats conspire with foreign nationals to win elections, but it's downright 'treason' and 'illegal collusion' when Republicans are even accused.
This post was edited on 7/12/18 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 7/12/18 at 1:39 pm to clooneyisgod
quote:
There is?
"No. No, he's not. We'll stop it". Is it your contention that someone hacked Strzok's phone and sent that text?
Posted on 7/12/18 at 1:41 pm to ispkthtrth
quote:
t's weird. It seems the left believes Trump's comments on the campaign trail should be used against him in his travel ban (all 4 liberal judges on SCOTUS using that reasoning to rule against him,) yet the lead investigators at the FBI being openly pro-Clinton/anti-Trump had no impact
Wait wait wait wait. You're analogizing Trump's public comments TO THE PUBLIC as part of his official campaign to be President (explaining what he would do if elected) to private texts between FBI agents/cow-workers?
Dude that's not super smart of you
Posted on 7/12/18 at 1:43 pm to clooneyisgod
quote:
cow-workers?
Dude that's not super smart of you
Every damn time
Posted on 7/12/18 at 1:49 pm to roadGator
quote:
Every damn time
typo bros are rough
Posted on 7/12/18 at 2:09 pm to AUstar
quote:
Defendant: "I can assure you, judge, that my text messages were merely late night personal musings about the victim and by no means had any impact in my thinking when I killed him."
Reminds me of the LLamas with hats video.
CARRRRRRLLLLL Did you kill this guy?
What, me, no, kiling is my least favorite thing to do.
Ok, so tell me what you were doing.
Well he walked in and I uh, I stabbed him 37 times, CARRRRRLLLLLLLLL that kills people!
Oh, oh wow, I uh, I didn't know that.
Posted on 7/12/18 at 2:20 pm to jbgleason
quote:
The guy used a government cell phone to text his likewise government employed mistress to directly discuss the target of an investigation in derogatory terms.
Almost as interesting to me is the left is calling for Trump's head because of the (Alleged)sex with the porn star, while defending the FBI Agent while he was having (Alleged)sex with his mistress.
Posted on 7/12/18 at 2:23 pm to jbgleason
quote:
Instead of Anti-Trump texts, what if he had been sending racially biased texts? (i.e. using racial slurs) Would anyone be asking if racial bias tainted an investigation or would he just be immediately fired and pilloried in public? I see stories all the time where a police officer says something on a personal social media platform when off duty and unrelated to his official functions yet he is fired. Why is this different?
It's not different yet the Dems are working overtime to convince us that if he says he wasn't biased during work ours then we're to take his word on it...
and ignore his text of extreme bias...."because he has right to a personal opinion off duty"...
If we had text messages like this of a SCOTUS nominee, there is no way they would get confirmed....
ZERO
Posted on 7/12/18 at 2:23 pm to clooneyisgod
You tried to dunk from the foul line at your height and weight. Not my fault.
If you are going to call people dumb you may want to proof read your blathering.
If you are going to call people dumb you may want to proof read your blathering.
Posted on 7/12/18 at 2:24 pm to jbgleason
Mark Furhman agrees with your assessment
Posted on 7/12/18 at 2:44 pm to jbgleason
quote:
Why does this matter?
It matters because as an investigator or prosecutor your number one goal is SUPPOSED to be justice, that means both solving crimes and getting convictions and assuring that the accused are given their rights. Includng the right to an unbiased investigation.
And yes, if you are investigating a black person for committing a crime, but you're texting about how much you hate negroes, you probably should have recused yourself from that investigation, not probably definitely. It's not about bias, it's about the appearance of a conflict of interest, As an investigator you should have NO bias nor interest in anything but the facts of the case because the accused deserves that.
Posted on 7/12/18 at 4:14 pm to roadGator
quote:
If you are going to call people dumb you may want to proof read your blathering.
Trump has typos in most of his tweets, yet we still all understand that he's a stable genius. The more typos, the smarter the human (is what I always say).
Posted on 7/12/18 at 4:21 pm to clooneyisgod
quote:
Trump has typos in most of his tweets
I don't follow him on Twitter so I'll trust you as far as I can throw you.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News