Started By
Message

re: State laws prohibiting lockdowns, mandates, and gain of function research

Posted on 9/5/23 at 2:59 pm to
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
55490 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

Desantis taking that L and will never be more than a footnote in republican primary history, however



Why would this scenario make you happy?
This post was edited on 9/5/23 at 2:59 pm
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
87847 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Nope


And you wonder why no one takes you ronbots serious

Especially a RINO chaser like yourself
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:03 pm to
I can't blame you for running from your stupid assertion as fast as you can.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
87847 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:05 pm to
The cooler of the poliboard has spoken
Posted by GetMeOutOfHere
Member since Aug 2018
909 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

Florida republicans hold veto proof majority in Florida

Iow Florida laws could be the same even with a Democrat governor


Yeah, that's worked out so well in Louisiana, right?

John Bel is completely held in check by that veto-proof majority... oh, wait.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
53272 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

Do you want to give it shot?


Look down one post. I’m not sure the alternative is better for you. Are you arguing that DeSantis was so ineffective as an executive that local authorities just completely ignored his orders?
This post was edited on 9/5/23 at 3:13 pm
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
53272 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

Oh. The county? Interesting how it's always county officials when you deal with facts.


Are you under the impression that county officials do not have the power to enforce executive orders? You’re smarter than that. What is the distinction you’re trying to make here?
This post was edited on 9/5/23 at 3:22 pm
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
150253 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:26 pm to
It’s funny you want Ron to answer for personally arresting folks but don’t seem interested in Trump answering for anything.

Weird
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:34 pm to
K. Why don't you post the link for everyone, and I'll make you look like a fricking retard. Again.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
87847 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:36 pm to
The link was posted for you
Sorry you failed again cause you are the cooler
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

Look down one post.


Barry, you're not about to jump on that failure, are you?

Have you actually read into the example that dumb bastard provided?
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

The link was posted for you


Where? I saw some cherry-picked quotes, but no link.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
53272 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

Barry, you're not about to jump on that failure, are you? Have you actually read into the example that dumb bastard provided?


Where the county official specifically cited the governors EO? I mean I could post the hundreds of arrests that occurred in Miami at spring break, but it seemed like overkill. Being arrested for multiple offenses doesn’t negate a particular offense from being a reason for arrest.


But fine. You tell me what happened. Either:

1). Beach goers were arrested and the EO was a reason given for the arrest; or

2). Local officials ignored a weak executive because they knew his EOs were bullshite and he wouldn’t do anything about it.

Your choice.
This post was edited on 9/5/23 at 3:49 pm
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
53272 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

It’s funny you want Ron to answer for personally arresting folks but don’t seem interested in Trump answering for anything. Weird


I never said either of those things. I said Ron’s EOs were the basis for arrests. Do you disagree?

Trump should absolutely answer for many of his actions. The law fare and politically based prosecutions aren’t the correct avenue for that. That is some fascist bullshite. Do you disagree?
This post was edited on 9/5/23 at 3:47 pm
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Where the county official specifically cited the governors EO? I mean I could post the hundred of arrests that occurred at spring break, but it seemed like overkill. Being arrested for multiple offenses doesn’t negate a particular offense from being the reason for arrest.



Sigh. What are the facts, Barry? What were they arrested for and what was the outcome of their cases?

quote:

Either:


It isn't "either" once you actually know what you're talking about. Go look it up.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

I never said either of those things. I said Ron’s EOs were the basis for arrests. Do you disagree?


Yep. You're wrong.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
87847 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:50 pm to
BAY COUNTY, Fla. -- Three people were arrested in Florida on Wednesday after violating Governor Ron DeSantis' order of not gathering in large crowds on the beach.

Bay County Sheriff’s Office says it arrested three people "on the sandy beaches that were gathered for a house party, spilling out onto the sandy beaches with alcoholic beverages and in large numbers. They were in direct violation of both the Governor’s Order concerning crowds and a local ordinance banning alcohol on the beach in March."


Deputies say that around 2:30 p.m., a deputy patrolling along the shore heard loud music and saw a large group of people on the sand and at a home on Surf Drive near Beach Access 18.

"The large number of people at the house party and their disregard for law enforcement were making it difficult to maneuver emergency vehicles around or through the crowd," deputies say in a release.

Deputies say the number of people gathered were in direct violation of Governor DeSantis’ Executive Order 20-68 -- which says gatherings of people must be limited to groups of 10 separated from each other by six feet, due to COVID-19.

"The crowd had been warned already by another deputy for the need to comply with the Order and had spread out," the release states. "But appeared disorganized and drinking alcoholic beverages -- a violation of a local county ordinance banning alcohol on the sandy beaches in March in Bay County."


Somehow this isnt real we will be told from a loser from Ohio
You do the same with the beaches werent closed when they were
This post was edited on 9/5/23 at 3:51 pm
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:52 pm to
...and still no link. I think you know why it's a bad idea for you to provide a link, but I can never tell whether you actually get it or not.
Posted by Chancellor
BHam
Member since Oct 2017
2587 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Desantis taking that L


Anti-Conservatives rejoice at the defeat of Conservatism.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
87847 posts
Posted on 9/5/23 at 4:04 pm to
Thats the entire article from weartv which is ABC affiliate so we know you love it

As expected you just make up excuses after getting crushed
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram