Started By
Message

re: So I was born in the late 90s and consider myself to be pretty liberal...

Posted on 12/14/17 at 2:56 pm to
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

I said the power of the executive branch has become too broad; not the federal government as a whole.

What exactly do you think makes up most of the federal government?
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

I know I’d be called a socialist or a communist
And the people calling you those things would be correct.
Posted by 337Tiger19
Lake Charles, LA
Member since Feb 2014
2482 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

So 100% of the bureaucracy is necessary


Why is the extreme assumed when I say something.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
56702 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

I know I’d be called a socialist or a communist; but honestly that money could be taxed and put into any number of federal programs beneficial to the middle class.



I wouldn't call you either, just a redistributivist. You are literally talking about taking already taxed money from dead individuals in order to give it to others. I'm also curious as to what kind of federal programs you think ought to exist for the middle class.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

I know I’d be called a socialist or a communist; but honestly that money could be taxed and put into any number of federal programs beneficial to the middle class.


If you think government bureacracy is better than private investment, yes you are.

Being a bureaucrat. Is more lucrative and less risky than owning your own business
Posted by culsutiger
Member since Apr 2012
652 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 3:00 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/13/18 at 11:13 pm
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

I know I’d be called a socialist or a communist; but honestly that money could be taxed and put into any number of federal programs beneficial to the middle class.


we could just take everyones money and dole it out evenly.
Posted by 337Tiger19
Lake Charles, LA
Member since Feb 2014
2482 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

'm also curious as to what kind of federal programs you think ought to exist for the middle class.


IMO, they’re dead, and if republicans really care about personal achievement, all of it certainly shouldn’t go to they’re kids who usually just wait for daddy to die.

But that’s beaides the point, I do believe in the welfare. It does help people. I do believe in social security; I don’t think it should run out. Basic things like health care and education should be a right in my opinion if this county is the greatest. The definition of great is different for many people however.
This post was edited on 12/14/17 at 3:04 pm
Posted by 337Tiger19
Lake Charles, LA
Member since Feb 2014
2482 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

I'll go ahead and solve the issue. Because the current tax only affects "them" and not you. Your entire philosophy on taxation is so transparently driven by envy that it's disgusting.



If my estate ended up to be valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. I wouldn’t mind that being taxed, and I’m not the only one who thinks like that.
This post was edited on 12/14/17 at 3:05 pm
Posted by 337Tiger19
Lake Charles, LA
Member since Feb 2014
2482 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

What exactly do you think makes up most of the federal government?


The other two branches.
Posted by rintintin
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
17063 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

my estate ended up to be valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. I wouldn’t mind that being taxed, and I’m not the only one who thinks like that.


And you're free to give as much of that money as you wish to the gov't. Seriously, you know the IRS has a website where you can give them as much money as you wish huh?

So why if that's your, and apparently many others, opinion must you require it from other people who have differing opinions?
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

The other two branches.
dude
Posted by TaderSalad
mudbug territory
Member since Jul 2014
26445 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

So I was born in the late 90s and consider myself to be pretty liberal...




You should do some research on income taxation then. There was a point in this country where we paid no income tax and things were better off than they are now. Your argument is a moot point about passing the burden on to our kids. The answer is to pay less taxes in order to hold/keep government accountable.

They work for us, not the other way around.
Posted by MSMHater
Houston
Member since Oct 2008
23254 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

If my estate ended up to be valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. I wouldn’t mind that being taxed, and I’m not the only one who thinks like that.


So easy to spend other peoples money that you'll never have.
This post was edited on 12/14/17 at 3:14 pm
Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

IMO, they’re dead, and if republicans really care about personal achievement, all of it certainly shouldn’t go to they’re kids who usually just wait for daddy to die.


That is some communist level thinking. What is the government doing to earn that money other than just sitting there waiting for daddy to die?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 3:15 pm to
quote:




If my estate ended up to be valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. I wouldn’t mind that being taxed, and I’m not the only one who thinks like that.



It's easy to be generous with theoretical money

If every rich prog would give 50% of their wealth to the poor we could solve all kinds of problems.
Posted by beaverfever
Arkansas
Member since Jan 2008
36192 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 3:16 pm to
It is NOT against the law to give your money to the government. I don’t know of any ultra rich people who have given or committed to giving extra money to the government.
Posted by 337Tiger19
Lake Charles, LA
Member since Feb 2014
2482 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 3:17 pm to
Does the federal gorvernment not have three branches or am I already that drunk?
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
20919 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 3:17 pm to
So you chose lawyer because you like stealing people's money and you're complaining the government is a better thief?
Posted by culsutiger
Member since Apr 2012
652 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 3:17 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/13/18 at 11:13 pm
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram