- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sec of Defense headed to WH after presser
Posted on 6/3/20 at 11:24 am to The Maj
Posted on 6/3/20 at 11:24 am to The Maj
quote:
Even if it is implemented, no one really wants to do it... It is one of those things of last resort that should be distasteful for ANYONE involved...
There is a difference in "support" and doing one's duty...
I agree with that but if the time comes it comes
and the OP post is bullshite by the way
Posted on 6/3/20 at 3:33 pm to The Maj
quote:Perhaps this is the way you see it but I don't think you can find supporting info that others do.
Even if it is implemented, no one really wants to do it... It is one of those things of last resort that should be distasteful for ANYONE involved...
There is a difference in "support" and doing one's duty...
Remember, this exact situation has never taken place before for officers to express their personal feelings.
BTW, people took orders when I was in there. Nobody performed their duties based on their "support". We took orders ... period.
Can you see an officer deciding what duties they would perform based on their "support" under L.B.J.?
Posted on 6/3/20 at 3:37 pm to OleWar
quote:
the Union was victorious in the Civil War without one so no.
Union did have a Secretary of War, though. Edwin Stanton
Posted on 6/3/20 at 3:39 pm to Jjdoc
Gawn Pecawn
This post was edited on 6/3/20 at 3:40 pm
Popular
Back to top

0





