- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Reality: 1944 vs. 2017
Posted on 11/12/17 at 6:18 pm
Posted on 11/12/17 at 6:18 pm
As seen on Instagram: In 1944 18-year olds were storming the beaches of Normandy to almost certain death. In 2017 18-year olds need safe spaces because words hurt their feelings.
Here's to our veterans!
Here's to our veterans!
Posted on 11/12/17 at 6:21 pm to conservativewifeymom
There are 18 year old soldiers fighting wars right now.
There were 18 year old dipshits in 1944.
There were 18 year old dipshits in 1944.
Posted on 11/12/17 at 6:22 pm to conservativewifeymom
Just in case you missed it, 18 year olds have been in continuous combat since 2001.
Posted on 11/12/17 at 6:22 pm to Breesus
I think you will agree that there were quite as many losers back then as now. We would have never won the war if there had been!
Posted on 11/12/17 at 6:26 pm to conservativewifeymom
quote:
I think you will agree that there were quite as many losers back then as now. We would have never won the war if there had been!
You might read Men Against Fire by S.L.A. Marshall.
Posted on 11/12/17 at 6:34 pm to conservativewifeymom
The lust for war and 18 year olds dying is a disgusting thing.
Posted on 11/12/17 at 6:36 pm to conservativewifeymom
ARMY SIZE IN 1945
"In 1941, the Army Air Corps had just 152,125 personnel. The AAF grew to a peak of over 2.4 million personnel and approximately 80,000 aircraft in 1944."
"In the summer of 1943 the decision was made to build the Army to an effective strength of 7.7 million personnel. By 1945, operating strength reached 8.3 million. But only 2.75 million, or a third, were in the AGF. About 1,200,000 personnel were assigned to divisions and 1,500,000 to non-divisional units. Non-divisional forces included service units and some additional combat troops not initially assigned to a division."
So add the Army Air Force number and add to the portion of the Army in the AGF and that is 5.15 million people.
The population in 1945 was 140 million.
The population in 2017 is 325 million. To have the same percentage of the population in the military today would require about 12 million people.
No fricking way you could find 12 million people of the proper age today that are worth a shite.
The US military has 2.3 million people including reservists in the military today.
"In 1941, the Army Air Corps had just 152,125 personnel. The AAF grew to a peak of over 2.4 million personnel and approximately 80,000 aircraft in 1944."
"In the summer of 1943 the decision was made to build the Army to an effective strength of 7.7 million personnel. By 1945, operating strength reached 8.3 million. But only 2.75 million, or a third, were in the AGF. About 1,200,000 personnel were assigned to divisions and 1,500,000 to non-divisional units. Non-divisional forces included service units and some additional combat troops not initially assigned to a division."
So add the Army Air Force number and add to the portion of the Army in the AGF and that is 5.15 million people.
The population in 1945 was 140 million.
The population in 2017 is 325 million. To have the same percentage of the population in the military today would require about 12 million people.
No fricking way you could find 12 million people of the proper age today that are worth a shite.
The US military has 2.3 million people including reservists in the military today.
Posted on 11/12/17 at 6:49 pm to gthog61
quote:
The US military has 2.3 million people including reservists in the military today.
Guard and reservists are mostly Gen Xers...
There's probably only 1,000,000 in the military under 30...mostly marines and army
Posted on 11/12/17 at 7:04 pm to Markie812
And what about this statement generated those thoughts? Yeah, safe spaces and the weaklings calling for them are so much better and contributing to overall welfare!
Posted on 11/12/17 at 7:06 pm to IceTiger
quote:As an aside, the Marines are far and away the youngest branch on average. Is really the only branch left where people join because they really just want to serve their country for a while.
There's probably only 1,000,000 in the military under 30...mostly marines and army
Posted on 11/12/17 at 7:07 pm to conservativewifeymom
quote:
In 1944 18-year olds were storming the beaches of Normandy to almost certain death.
18 year olds serve today as well. A ton of them. A lot of 18 year olds have been killed in the ME fighting wars that shouldn't have been waged.
quote:
In 2017 18-year olds need safe spaces because words hurt their feelings.
You do know that liberal service members have always existed, right? The safe space stuff is fairly new, but very few liberals believe in that shite either.
Liberal =/= progressive. Progressives are the ones that you should take your anger out on.
This post was edited on 11/12/17 at 7:10 pm
Posted on 11/12/17 at 7:10 pm to conservativewifeymom
quote:
And what about this statement generated those thoughts?
You couldn't be more wrong.
If the country were actually in peril, I have zero doubt that millions of 18-year-olds would answer that call in defense of our nation.
The fact is, none of the wars we have fought since World War 2 threatened our nation.
The Japanese went to war with us in 1941 on the SAME MISTAKEN BELIEF you just shared. That Americans would never sacrifice because we are soft. And they would drive us to the negotiation table quickly.
They were wrong then, and you are wrong now.
You should be ashamed of this post.
Posted on 11/12/17 at 7:11 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Just in case you missed it, 18 year olds have been in continuous combat since 2001.
I'm convinced we're in the midst of another 100-Years War.
Posted on 11/12/17 at 7:16 pm to asurob1
quote:
If the country were actually in peril, I have zero doubt that millions of 18-year-olds would answer that call in defense of our nation.
And not a single one would be from the SJW/progressive anti-American movement, I believe that’s the point of the OP
Posted on 11/12/17 at 7:17 pm to asurob1
quote:
You should be ashamed of this post.
She's posted a lot of things that she should be ashamed of, but she never is.
Posted on 11/12/17 at 7:20 pm to asurob1
quote:
If the country were actually in peril, I have zero doubt that millions of 18-year-olds would answer that call in defense of our nation.
...and you would be wrong.
Posted on 11/12/17 at 7:21 pm to Rekrul
quote:
And not a single one would be from the SJW/progressive anti-American movement, I believe that’s the point of the OP
But plenty of run of the mill Democrats, which she also hates, would. Plenty of them serve today.
Posted on 11/12/17 at 7:24 pm to Rekrul
quote:
And not a single one would be from the SJW/progressive anti-American movement, I believe that’s the point of the OP
Wrong.
Someone fricks with America, Americans answer the call. Liberal or conservative.
The simply fact is we haven't been threatened seriously since the Soviet Union was destroyed by the great commie killer Reagan.
Posted on 11/12/17 at 7:41 pm to conservativewifeymom
in 1944 General George S. Patton wanted to take on Russia.
In 2017 Trump wants to have a picnic with Putin.
In 2017 Trump wants to have a picnic with Putin.
Posted on 11/12/17 at 7:42 pm to Halftrack
You are such a retarded poster
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News