- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/16/14 at 8:03 am to Sentrius
quote:
With McCain, we would be in 7-8 different wars right now. Obama was definitely the lesser evil on this issue.
agreed. mccain would have been a shite show. and if romney won, he might have skipped the "economic warfare" and we might be in "warfare warfare" with russia right now. i hate to say it but maybe it's a good thing we have a president with no balls because our shite list is long enough without having to worry about the dirty russians..
Rand Paul 2016
Posted on 9/16/14 at 8:09 am to Sentrius
I'm done with the "forever" war on terror.
I'm for a cold war approach.
Contain and react as last result and do so with furious and swift action. Our energy is not dependent on the ME any more. Draw a big circle around that cesspool and stay out and keep in.
I'm for a cold war approach.
Contain and react as last result and do so with furious and swift action. Our energy is not dependent on the ME any more. Draw a big circle around that cesspool and stay out and keep in.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 8:14 am to goatmilker
quote:
I'm done with the "forever" war on terror. I'm for a cold war approach. Contain and react as last result and do so with furious and swift action. Our energy is not dependent on the ME any more. Draw a big circle around that cesspool and stay out and keep in.
We're just playing whackamole at this point. We've been in the region for 13 years now, and our humint didn't (or couldn't convince leadership) see a 30k man strong force being built up
We're just bouncing around the region (ME/N. Africa) using an old AUMF striking at whoever becomes the biggest bogeyman.
We need a complete overhaul of how we deal with radical islam at this point. I have to think everyone can see this most recent ISIS strategy is going to be another boondoggle once those arms end up in not so friendly hands or the groups we arm turn on us.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 8:15 am to jamboybarry
quote:
We're just playing whackamole at this point.
Well said.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 8:17 am to a want
It's always the media's fault. Or someone's fault other than their own. They refuse to to responsibility for doing poorly.
NEVER have they taken responsibility for running a bad race it's always the media's fault.
NEVER have they taken responsibility for running a bad race it's always the media's fault.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 8:24 am to Vegas Bengal
quote:
They refuse to to responsibility for doing poorly.
i think that the response of the liberal portion of the media is the reaction to paul doing the opposite of poorly
quote:
NEVER have they taken responsibility for running a bad race
well this depends on how we judge "running a good race". romney ran a good race. the biggest "hit" was a social issues war created by the media. romney's strategy was to hide behind his religion and avoid social issues entirely. he would rarely, if ever, engage in the social issues debate so that he could discuss the real issues (economic issues). hell, he was directly associated with the (stupid) comments of random congressional candidates.
note: i did not support romney nor did i vote for him. i'm speaking as an objective political observer
Posted on 9/16/14 at 8:39 am to SlowFlowPro
Romney's "47%" comment was no more the media's fault than Obama's "bitter clinger" comment. It's what they really believe and I think it's fair game.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 8:44 am to SlowFlowPro
bullshite. There never has been an interview, whether it be Paul or Palin or Bush or Jindal, when someone hasn't jumped on "the media". It's what Republicans do.
"Governor Palin, what newspapers and magazines do you read?"
"Um.... Duh... Ummmm"
Unfair! Media bias! Setup!
"Governor Palin, what newspapers and magazines do you read?"
"Um.... Duh... Ummmm"
Unfair! Media bias! Setup!
Posted on 9/16/14 at 8:45 am to trackfan
romney wasn't wrong. that "47%" comment goes both ways, too (it may be higher than 47 though)
near 50% of the country, on both sides, is ingrained in one of the 2 political parties. national elections are won largely by short term (and often emotiona-irrational) decision making of that 4-6% not subject to the large chunks on both sides
near 50% of the country, on both sides, is ingrained in one of the 2 political parties. national elections are won largely by short term (and often emotiona-irrational) decision making of that 4-6% not subject to the large chunks on both sides
Posted on 9/16/14 at 8:46 am to Vegas Bengal
quote:
bullshite. There never has been an interview, whether it be Paul or Palin or Bush or Jindal, when someone hasn't jumped on "the media". It's what Republicans do.
as if liberals don't dismiss fox news just the same
Note: i do not watch FNC and i loathe being somewhere where it is on
This post was edited on 9/16/14 at 8:47 am
Posted on 9/16/14 at 8:48 am to trackfan
Before the internet and right wing talk radio, it was all "liberal media" with no true "right wing media" outlets. And Republicans won the White House 5 of 6 times.
Then came Fox News, Drudge, Rush et al and Republicans have lost 5 of 6 times (in the popular vote).
Then came Fox News, Drudge, Rush et al and Republicans have lost 5 of 6 times (in the popular vote).
Posted on 9/16/14 at 8:58 am to SlowFlowPro
Dismissing one cable news channel and dismissing every other outlet is a bit different.
Conservatives, you included, just can't wrap their heads around the fact that people don't think like they do. So they create these fictions, these strawmen, to account for this.
You do it all the time. Your squawking about how others are "single issue voters" or your threads of how liberals think and you know because you were once a liberal.
You just can't understand how reasonable minds can think differently. So you go about trashing either the media for misrepresenting or your opponents cheating or the voters being stupid. But NEVER that you just lost because the other side either had better ideas or had better ways of presenting their ideas.
You're like Arkansas fans always blaming the refs. It's never you. It's always someone else's fault.
And this is every issue. Whether it be global warming or racism or anything. It's the media favoring one side. It's never that you just lost the debate or you may be wrong.
You never ever own your loss. You're incapable of doing so. It's not in your DNA.
Conservatives, you included, just can't wrap their heads around the fact that people don't think like they do. So they create these fictions, these strawmen, to account for this.
You do it all the time. Your squawking about how others are "single issue voters" or your threads of how liberals think and you know because you were once a liberal.
You just can't understand how reasonable minds can think differently. So you go about trashing either the media for misrepresenting or your opponents cheating or the voters being stupid. But NEVER that you just lost because the other side either had better ideas or had better ways of presenting their ideas.
You're like Arkansas fans always blaming the refs. It's never you. It's always someone else's fault.
And this is every issue. Whether it be global warming or racism or anything. It's the media favoring one side. It's never that you just lost the debate or you may be wrong.
You never ever own your loss. You're incapable of doing so. It's not in your DNA.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 9:06 am to Vegas Bengal
He also uses broad strokes and over simplifies as well as stereotyping.
Right?
Right?
Posted on 9/16/14 at 9:14 am to Vegas Bengal
VB doing some projecting. 
Posted on 9/16/14 at 9:14 am to goatmilker
quote:
I'm done with the "forever" war on terror.
This. George Orwell wrote about this in "1984."
Posted on 9/16/14 at 9:24 am to Vegas Bengal
quote:
Dismissing one cable news channel and dismissing every other outlet is a bit different.
not when they represent different ends of the spectrum. there is a reason FNC is so high in the ratings: it's the only major tv outlet
quote:
Conservatives, you included, just can't wrap their heads around the fact that people don't think like they do.
yeah the former super liberal SFP doesn't understand that people don't think like i do (now)
great point
quote:
Your squawking about how others are "single issue voters" or your threads of how liberals think and you know because you were once a liberal.
which are wrong, exactly?
those are also comparisons in the voting blocs. i also rail on conservative voters for not showing up unless they have the "perfect" candidate. that was a major issue with romney (and possibly will be with paul). that's why so many candidates cater to the insane religious right demo of the GOP.
i criticize both sides for their irrational voting patterns
quote:
You just can't understand how reasonable minds can think differently.
sure i do
i can also understand how people think irrationally, emotionally, or just downright incorrectly
this is similar to the "empathy" argument people try to get in with me. i fully understand the "why" in terms of people making decisions. that doesn't mean that i just absolutely accept the "why".
quote:
. So you go about trashing either the media for misrepresenting or your opponents cheating or the voters being stupid. But NEVER that you just lost because the other side either had better ideas or had better ways of presenting their ideas.
this is patently false. i routinely acknowledge how the DEMs out politic the GOP by lying and pandering better
voting blocs/coalitions have a lot to do with it, also. it makes it easier for the DEMs due to their demos (i went into it in this post)
that's political science, not opinion
i don't agree with either. the fact that these motherfrickers have so much (money/power) to pander with is the sign that something is wrong
quote:
It's the media favoring one side.
but the media will favor one side, especially with how rhetorical "the media" has become
not only are outlets pandering to certain demos, but hosts within the outlets pander to even more specific demos
this isn't a liberal/conservative thing. it happens on both sides. one side just is more ingrained in old media
quote:
You never ever own your loss
i voted for a presidential candidate that got 1% of the vote last election. i fully understood what i was doing and the irrationality of the other 99% of people voting. that's called "owning" a loss
who did you vote for? the candidate who was publicly opposed to gay marriage in 2008? i thought so
This post was edited on 9/16/14 at 9:25 am
Posted on 9/16/14 at 9:29 am to StrangeBrew
Vegas Bungle's predictable propaganda notwithstanding, 95% of the liberal media has already jumped in bed with Hillary Clinton (apologize for the implied visual). They are all set to engage in a seek & destroy mission against anybody who gets in HRC's way, and Rand is the primary target right now.
CBS News did an extended report on Hillary's recent trip to Iowa. There wasn't one critical comment about her record, such as that stupid reset button fiasco, or the "we've got the terrorists on the run" comment by her boss while she was SOS.
Seriously, the report was so light that, if I hadn't known better, I would've thought they were talking about some woman who was getting her own daytime talk show. "Here's Hillary!"
You think Rand Paul or Ted Cruz, or any conservative for that matter, would ever get a fluff piece like that?
PS - Memo to Vegas Bengal: The news media isn't supposed to take sides, brogan. That's not their job; their job is to report the news in an objective manner. That's Journalism 101.
Of course, professional journalism is dead and buried.
CBS News did an extended report on Hillary's recent trip to Iowa. There wasn't one critical comment about her record, such as that stupid reset button fiasco, or the "we've got the terrorists on the run" comment by her boss while she was SOS.
Seriously, the report was so light that, if I hadn't known better, I would've thought they were talking about some woman who was getting her own daytime talk show. "Here's Hillary!"
You think Rand Paul or Ted Cruz, or any conservative for that matter, would ever get a fluff piece like that?
PS - Memo to Vegas Bengal: The news media isn't supposed to take sides, brogan. That's not their job; their job is to report the news in an objective manner. That's Journalism 101.
Of course, professional journalism is dead and buried.
This post was edited on 9/16/14 at 9:38 am
Popular
Back to top

0







