- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Question for the Lawyers
Posted on 4/9/18 at 7:14 pm to IrishTiger89
Posted on 4/9/18 at 7:14 pm to IrishTiger89
quote:
FEC Violations, Money Laundering, Bank Fraud???
Does anyone know what the warrant was sworn out for, or is the hope that they'll find something and go from there?
Serious question.
1
Posted on 4/9/18 at 7:15 pm to Dale51
quote:
Does anyone know what the warrant was sworn out for, or is the hope that they'll find something and go from there?
Serious question.
Do yall even read the thread? I've explained this. Warrants do NOT list any crimes on them. They merely list the location to be searched and any limits on said search.
Posted on 4/9/18 at 7:17 pm to IrishTiger89
quote:
You cannot honestly admit that a $130k payment to a porn star two weeks before the election doesn't look fishy as hell.
Interesting...how fishy does deleting 30k emails that were mandated to be preserved..then destroying hard drives and refusing to turn over illegal servers look to you?
On a relative scale, where does each fall in your judgment?
Posted on 4/9/18 at 7:18 pm to IrishTiger89
quote:
It is a known fact that Stormy Daniels was paid $130k in hush money 2 weeks before the election.
And?
Posted on 4/9/18 at 7:20 pm to Dale51
quote:
Interesting...how fishy does deleting 30k emails that were mandated to be preserved..then destroying hard drives and refusing to turn over illegal servers look to you? On a relative scale, where does each fall in your judgment?
They are both very fishy
Posted on 4/9/18 at 7:21 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
They merely list the location to be searched and any limits on said search.
Does it state what they're supposed to be looking for??
Posted on 4/9/18 at 7:21 pm to Dale51
quote:
And?
That should probably be investigated because it looks like a FEC violation
Posted on 4/9/18 at 7:22 pm to Dale51
quote:
By the lawyer..not Trump?
I assume Mueller would be interested in anything tying this to Trump. Whether or not that exists, no one here knows.
Posted on 4/9/18 at 7:22 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
Do yall even read the thread? I've explained this. Warrants do NOT list any crimes on them. They merely list the location to be searched and any limits on said search.
It does have to state probable cause, no?
Posted on 4/9/18 at 7:22 pm to IrishTiger89
quote:
They are both very fishy
What are you comparing to arrive at the conclusion that they are similar in nature?
Posted on 4/9/18 at 7:23 pm to Dale51
quote:
Does it state what they're supposed to be looking for??
Sometimes, but not always. And they never limit it I mean you wouldn't see a a warrant that said
"Search OJ's house for bloody knife and nothing else" for example.
Posted on 4/9/18 at 7:24 pm to IrishTiger89
quote:It looks like that to you because that’s what you want it to look like.
That should probably be investigated because it looks like a FEC violation
Posted on 4/9/18 at 7:24 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
There is always (assuming the warrant was created by a competent attorney) catch-all language included.
Posted on 4/9/18 at 7:25 pm to IrishTiger89
A PDT appointed attorney in NY approved the raid...correct?
Posted on 4/9/18 at 7:26 pm to Dale51
quote:
What are you comparing to arrive at the conclusion that they are similar in nature?
They both look fishy and should be investigated? Crimes are bad and people should be punished for them if proven guilty in a court of law.
This post was edited on 4/9/18 at 7:27 pm
Posted on 4/9/18 at 7:27 pm to IrishTiger89
quote:Is that the bar for investigating and raiding people’s homes and businesses now?
They both look fishy and should be investigated?
Cause if so our FBI needs more funding
This post was edited on 4/9/18 at 7:27 pm
Posted on 4/9/18 at 7:27 pm to WillieNelsonsDoobie
quote:
A PDT appointed attorney in NY approved the raid...correct?
Incorrect. JUDGES approve warrants Good Lord.
Posted on 4/9/18 at 7:27 pm to IrishTiger89
quote:
They both look fishy and should be investigated? Crimes are bad and people should be punished for them if proven guilty in a court of law.
Paying for an NDA is not illegal. The crime here would be an alleged campaign donation violation.
Posted on 4/9/18 at 7:27 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
Sometimes, but not always. And they never limit it I mean you wouldn't see a a warrant that said "Search OJ's house for bloody knife and nothing else" for example.
I see what you mean, but it seems apples to oranges when you are talking about a group of documents that contain many other peoples private data. In a case like that it would seem to require more specificity.
Posted on 4/9/18 at 7:28 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Paying for an NDA is not illegal. The crime here would be an alleged campaign donation violation.
Correct
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News