- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/4/21 at 9:03 am to Jbird
Now extrapolate the savings in healthcare by folks not getting the virus and not being hospitalized. You got to crack a few eggs to make an omelette.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 9:04 am to Jbird
Drug companies bad. Profits bad. That sounds like leftists.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 9:04 am to Jbird
Quite the business model
Problem (created/inflated)
Reaction (fear)
Solution ($$$$/control)
Problem (created/inflated)
Reaction (fear)
Solution ($$$$/control)
Posted on 5/4/21 at 9:05 am to Jake88
quote:Where the frick did I saw it was fricking bad?
Drug companies bad. Profits bad. That sounds like leftists.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 9:05 am to Jbird
Pfizer getting paid was probably a byproduct of China’s release of the Wu Flu. Getting Drumph was the primary intent.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 9:06 am to Jake88
quote:
Drug companies bad. Profits bad.
Drug companies are bad. Government protections for drug companies are really bad. I don't care what it sounds like to you.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 9:06 am to ThinePreparedAni
quote:
Quite the business model
Problem (created/inflated)
Reaction (fear)
Solution ($$$$/control)
This is basically an anti-capitalist rant.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 9:08 am to cwill
quote:
This is basically an anti-capitalist rant.
If you ignore the government involvement and inherent NAP violation, sure.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 9:09 am to cwill
quote:
This is basically an anti-capitalist rant.
I have no problem of being critical when calling out exploits (in any system)
I hold many "opposing' views in balance. An example being an advocate for food quality and responsibly caring for the environment while acknowledging that "climate change" is fear mongering
This post was edited on 5/4/21 at 9:10 am
Posted on 5/4/21 at 9:09 am to Jbird
You don't think people infer from your OP that you are suggesting that the billions in profit is a bad thing? Other who responded certainly believe it is bad. There is no button for respond to all in a thread, so I directed the response to your op.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 9:10 am to Jake88
quote:I simply posted the news, did you read the link?
You don't think people infer from your OP that you are suggesting that the billions in profit is a bad thing?
Posted on 5/4/21 at 9:10 am to squid_hunt
quote:
Drug companies are bad
Posted on 5/4/21 at 9:12 am to Jake88
quote:
Other who responded certainly believe it is bad.
I think the amount of government money they received for development and being paid by the government by the dose can be called into questions without saying the profit is necessarily "bad"...
How much in taxes is expected from their 3.5 billion windfall?
Posted on 5/4/21 at 9:14 am to Jbird
quote:You are an intelligent guy. You knew exactly how this would go over on this site.
simply posted the news, did you read the link
Posted on 5/4/21 at 9:15 am to Jbird
This sounds like the pharmaceutical version of the military-industrial complex. Government and industry and rubbing each other's back. If the government can sell the need for a vaccine to more of the public, they get more kickbacks and big pharma makes more profit.
I'm not against companies making profit after footing the bill for the research and development when the market calls for natural demand of a product. But this doesn't smell right to me.
I'm not against companies making profit after footing the bill for the research and development when the market calls for natural demand of a product. But this doesn't smell right to me.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 9:15 am to The Maj
The link says Pfizer took no federal dollars and always said they were looking to profit.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 9:21 am to Jbird
They need it to keep pace with all the pay-offs given to politicians.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 9:21 am to Jake88
quote:
The link says Pfizer took no federal dollars and always said they were looking to profit.
So far, the largest sums have gone to pharmaceutical giants Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and a collaboration between Sanofi and GSK, as well as biotech firms Moderna and Novavax – all of which have candidate vaccines being tested in people
So, did they not take the money, give the money back or was USA Today wrong in their reporting?
USA Today
NY Times
Reuters
Posted on 5/4/21 at 9:23 am to Jake88
quote:If you mean knee jerk reactions and not reading the link, I guess you are correct.
You knew exactly how this would go over on this site.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News