- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pete Hegseth's plan to overhaul America's military: 'You need to fire a ton of generals'
Posted on 11/14/24 at 9:35 pm to Lima Whiskey
Posted on 11/14/24 at 9:35 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
Women should never serve in combat roles, they damage unit cohesion, and mixed gendered units perform much worse than all male units.
Live combat requires quick decision making based on logic and instinct, something I’ve never known a woman to be good at.
Posted on 11/14/24 at 9:41 pm to LAhinguarst
quote:
The only thing I partially disagree with.....THE STANDARDS should not be lowered for women to serve in combat roles.
That is what he said. We need to go back to like 1995 standards. If a woman can meet those them maybe. He is overall still against women and men in combat because like it or not nature does what nature does.
Posted on 11/14/24 at 9:49 pm to SG_Geaux
Serious question.
Can we have women only units that carry out certain missions? And what would those missions look like?
Can we have women only units that carry out certain missions? And what would those missions look like?
Posted on 11/15/24 at 6:45 am to SG_Geaux
quote:
That is what he said. We need to go back to like 1995 standards. If a woman can meet those them maybe. He is overall still against women and men in combat because like it or not nature does what nature does.
I like the (maybe) lol and still don't want women in combat - for two reasons:
1) Even if the standards are the same (Great), our bodys are not. We never care about the feelings of men who don't meet those standards, why should we care here (about sex/gender)? In combat roles & situations, too much time, effort and cost is spent in triage if something goes wrong. Show me an honest study, and I'll bet it would show it weakens a unit, not strengthens one.
2) Do we really want our sisters, daughters and wives fighting? I maintain, we as a country, do not. We lift them up, and we honor them for their effort. But that effort should be in support of combat troops, not within them.
Popular
Back to top

0






