- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Owen Shroyer is out of prison. Served 47 of 60 days for standing around on J6.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:31 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:31 am to SlowFlowPro
Your argument boils down to sucking Fed dick. Which is pretty awesome coming from you. Dance around it however you’d like.
2
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:32 am to TigerIn2023
quote:
oh that makes sense now…
They're hard-wired to argue dishonestly and emotionally, these days.
It's part of the brain rot I keep trying to combat with simple factual responses (which anger them because I don't drop to their emotional level and sky scream editorialization that they demand, so they impute it like the NPCs they are).
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:34 am to the808bass
quote:
Your argument
Argument?
What argument?
quote:
Dance around it however you’d like.
Understanding the difference in factual recitation and making an argument is the first step on your journey back to reality.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:34 am to SlowFlowPro
There’s the lawyer shite. Love it.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:35 am to the808bass
quote:
There’s the lawyer shite. Love it.
What lawyer shite?
Do you honestly not understand the difference in stating facts and making an argument?
Maybe I overrated your mental ability all of these years.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:36 am to the808bass
quote:
There’s the lawyer shite. Love it.
Of course.
Hank does the same shite, purposeful obfuscation.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:36 am to the808bass
quote:
Your argument boils down to sucking Fed dick. Which is pretty awesome coming from you.
Indeed.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:37 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:The fact that user got 41 upvotes and no downvotes for dishonesty quoting an article that states the opposite of his position says all you need to know about the mentality of some users here.
They're hard-wired to argue dishonestly and emotionally, these days.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:38 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
purposeful obfuscation.
What am I obfuscating by clarifying the facts/reality?
HERE is some lawyer shite:
Do you agree that stating intentional misinformation is obfuscation?
Do you agree that misattributing factual statements as rhetoric is obfuscation?
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:39 am to SlowFlowPro
You’re trying to turn this into a tar baby.
You’re implicitly agreeing that the FedGov keeping Shroyer from being on Capitol grounds (as a part of an agreement resulting from him protesting a government proceeding) is just.
I am in disagreement.
You’re implicitly agreeing that the FedGov keeping Shroyer from being on Capitol grounds (as a part of an agreement resulting from him protesting a government proceeding) is just.
I am in disagreement.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:39 am to TigerIn2023
quote:
The fact that user got 41 upvotes and no downvotes for dishonesty quoting an article that states the opposite of his position says all you need to know about the mentality of some users here.
Also the classic MAGA "body bagged" style responses
The literal embodiment of this meme:
Celebrating their projected ignorance and lack of intelligence
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:40 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:He’s simply quoting & citing articles from the AP and you think that is somehow purposefully difficult to understand?
purposeful obfuscation
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:41 am to the808bass
quote:
You’re implicitly agreeing
No I'm not.
quote:
that the FedGov keeping Shroyer from being on Capitol grounds (as a part of an agreement resulting from him protesting a government proceeding) is just.
I never said anything about being "just" or any other editorial on the situation.
I just clarifying the intentional misinformation of OP (and responses to OP) with facts.
quote:
I am in disagreement.
Feel free to disagree with your own straw man, if it makes you feel better.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:43 am to SlowFlowPro
Sure, pal.
I will agree that the added context you provided is important. It provides clarity to the sweeping power of the government and the dangers of challenging it.
I will agree that the added context you provided is important. It provides clarity to the sweeping power of the government and the dangers of challenging it.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:43 am to TigerIn2023
quote:
purposeful obfuscation
He’s simply quoting & citing articles from the AP
Which skirt the discussion.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:45 am to BobBoucher
quote:
“Illegally entered a restricted area” was the charge.
A carjacking might have led to less jail time.
The FedGov has been hijacked by radicals (Patriot Act plus Obama) and until we get a president with guts to fix it, nothing is going to change.
Trump had 4 years and didnt do shite.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:46 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Which skirt the discussion.
The discussion of misinformation being posted? How?
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:51 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
A carjacking might have led to less jail time.
In Chicago, it’s almost a coin flip if they even prosecute you for carjacking. Coincidentally enough for our discussion, they prefer to charge the carjackers with trespassing.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:52 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:So someone dishonestly quotes an article that states the opposite of their position, and you think the user point that out is the one purposefully obfuscating the argument?
Which skirt the discussion.
K.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:53 am to TigerIn2023
quote:
So someone dishonestly quotes an article that states the opposite of their position, and you think the user point that out is the one purposefully obfuscating the argument?
You forgot to add: "and pointing out that dishonesty without editorial comment will have editorial comments imputed upon it"
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News