- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 12/8/23 at 7:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
If a J6’er sought you out for defense, would you defend them
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:02 pm to lsuguy84
quote:
If a J6’er sought you out for defense, would you defend them
Sure.
I would call them a fricking idiot, but I do that with a lot of my clients. Effectively did that today with one b/c she lied to me and that created a path that ruined her case (non-criminal matter).
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:03 pm to dgnx6
quote:
spreading baseless claims of election fraud
Not so fast fats
They need to keep up.
It's not enough to change the results.
This post was edited on 12/8/23 at 8:04 pm
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
It was a genuine question. I know you catch a lot of shite, so I was curious.
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
One more and I will leave you alone - how do you set aside any biases you may have to defend someone? That’s not a bait question.
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:08 pm to lsuguy84
True story, I probably would have had I not convinced someone in my office building not to go. The week before they were like "hey are you going to DC next week?" And I was just like 
and convinced them not to go. Afterward they were extremely thankful I talked to them about it 
and convinced them not to go. Afterward they were extremely thankful I talked to them about it Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:12 pm to lsuguy84
quote:
how do you set aside any biases you may have to defend someone? That’s not a bait question.
My biases are more towards the facts/evidence at hand than the person.
A literal racist Nazi and/or Communist are still correct if they answer 4 to "what is 2+2?". I don't judge the responder when all I wanted was their answer to a factual question.
Now, if their status leads to a credibility issue, then that's kind of like having bad facts/evidence organically and I do judge that.
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
Appreciate the feedback. Very interesting profession.
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:16 pm to lsuguy84
There are a lot of lawyers who aren't as concerned about the facts but they often are just stealing client's money IMHO. You have to set reality and expectations from the outset for client control.
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
A lawyer can almost act as a psychologist these days. I think it would be a hard line to teeter across.
Posted on 12/8/23 at 9:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
Whose reality? Kind of like having your own truth. Or what you perceive to be the truth
Posted on 12/8/23 at 9:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
Can you be more of a basic bitch?
Posted on 12/8/23 at 9:49 pm to yakster
I relied on facts with cites
Try reading
Try reading
Posted on 12/9/23 at 12:20 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What "take" is there when I just recited actual, verifiable facts?
Your takes are all justifications for the suppression of political dissent by the DOJ.
On those rare occasions when you’re actually aware enough to notice the issue, you mumble something about “I’ve been railing against Federal criminal overreach for years so frick the little guy who’s just finding out about it now” or something approximating that.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 12:22 am to why_so_salty
quote:
Can you be more of a basic bitch?
He can and he will be. Hang around. He’ll be on the other side within 5 years.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 7:35 am to the808bass
quote:
Your takes are all justifications f
LINK?
I know the smooth brains on this board can't tell the difference in correcting facts and giving editorials on those facts, but I didn't think you'd fallen into that trap.
quote:
“I’ve been railing against Federal criminal overreach for years so frick the little guy who’s just finding out about it now”
No . The bold is more like, "the hypocrites who still opine for the police state"
Lots of idiots who were part of the riot on J6 got somewhat railroaded, but people who did what Shroyer did, without the prior orders, didn't go to jail. The only reason he did was because of an agreement he made previously with the feds to avoid prosecution.
I don't support riots, be it J6 or the summer of love in 2020.
I also don't support intentional obfuscation of basic facts to amplify the echo chamber. The thing is, I can deal with that without giving my own opinions. The problem is, and I'm sad you seem to be part of this group, too many people take correcting lies with the truth as some sort of personal opinion on the matter. You need to work on that.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 7:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The only reason he did was because of an agreement he made previously with the feds to avoid prosecution.
The only reason he had to make that agreement was because he interrupted the impeachment proceedings of the House Judiciary. And we’re back to where we started. You’re a simp for government overreach these days.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:08 am to dgnx6
quote:
oh did he? because msm says its for this....
Really odd to send a wall of quotes without providing a link.
quote:oh that makes sense now…
In December 2019, Shroyer was arrested in Washington after he disrupted a House Judiciary Committee hearing for then-President Trump’s impeachment proceedings. He later agreed to stay away from Capitol grounds, a condition of a deal resolving that case.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:30 am to the808bass
quote:
The only reason he had to make that agreement was because he interrupted the impeachment proceedings of the House Judiciary. And we’re back to where we started
Well yeah we start at his prior criminal issues and his voluntary agreement. That was my point originally.
quote:
You’re a simp for government overreach these days.
I never gave editorial comment or injected any subjective belief, ITT*
*Other than brief commentary in my initial response to you, which you apparently ignored intentionally.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News