- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/14/17 at 8:46 am to russellvillehog
quote:
Everyone after him has done the same for no reason.
Clinton didn't. Obama did because he was forced to by Bush's policies.
But I agree, HW Bush and Bush did for no reason, and Trump will for no reason.
Posted on 1/14/17 at 8:47 am to Bestbank Tiger
You left out: 20M people will lose health insurance, what insurance people can buy will not cover them in the event of a serious disease, and they will end up spending more on health care.
Posted on 1/14/17 at 8:47 am to BamaAtl
This board is as stupid as they come. I don't expect any of them to care or understand the repercussion of repealing the ACA.
Posted on 1/14/17 at 8:48 am to Old Hellen Yeller
quote:
but it doesn't have anything to do with the actual budget resolution that the GOP sold to you as an "Obamacare repeal."
Oh I don't support the current repeal either.
I'm legit asking: how should one go about meeting the demands of putting "something else in place" for a plan that was designed to be unsustainable after 6 years anyway?
What magic math should the fixer use to fix the magic math that the creator used?
I want this crap repealed, but the way it was written and implemented was designed for no easy fix AND no easy continuation (should it have gone that way). Anyone who read it before they passed it knew this.
Now those who passed, all by themselves, get to sit back and criticize those who now have to fix it. It is hilarious to watch. There was also a reason why the worst of it was to hit AFTER Obama left office.
Posted on 1/14/17 at 8:49 am to BamaAtl
Are you too stupid to realize that that is the debt in 2026 with all elements of the budget considered? Are you too stupid to realize that that is 9 trillion over 10 years, while Obama added 10 trillion over eight? That's a less than 50% increase compared to Obama's 100% increase.
Posted on 1/14/17 at 8:50 am to BamaAtl
quote:
Bush fricking up Clinton's surplus
This is still wrong.
Posted on 1/14/17 at 8:52 am to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
a plan that was designed to be unsustainable after 6 years anyway?
Which plan is this? Because that's not how the ACA was designed.
Posted on 1/14/17 at 8:53 am to BamaAtl
quote:
Because that's not how the ACA was designed.
Well, maybe not intentionally...
Posted on 1/14/17 at 8:53 am to Mr. Katanga
quote:
This board is as stupid as they come
Not so stupid that we are always on the lookout for handouts like your sorry arse.
This post was edited on 1/14/17 at 8:54 am
Posted on 1/14/17 at 8:53 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
This is still wrong.
It's almost like you're intentionally lying.
Posted on 1/14/17 at 8:56 am to BamaAtl
quote:
Which plan is this? Because that's not how the ACA was designed.
Oh is this the "what you read wasn't real" defense?
Well this troll thread was fun. I'm going to say 9 pages.
Posted on 1/14/17 at 8:57 am to BamaAtl
Clinton never had a surplus
Posted on 1/14/17 at 8:58 am to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
Oh is this the "what you read wasn't real" defense?
If that's reality, sure. The ACA was not designed to fail in 6 years, and is performing very well. That doesn't mean it's perfect or couldn't be tweaked, but it's not the imploding mess lies have led you to believe.
Posted on 1/14/17 at 8:59 am to BamaAtl
Yeah, that had nothing to do with Gingrich and the republicans forcing that clown into welfare reform and budget restraint and the internet boom that Clinton had absolutely nothing to do with.
Posted on 1/14/17 at 9:00 am to BamaAtl
The national debt rose every single year under Clinton.
Every. Single. Year.
Clinton had no surplus. You buying into that bullshite because you don't understand math is your problem.
Every. Single. Year.
Clinton had no surplus. You buying into that bullshite because you don't understand math is your problem.
Posted on 1/14/17 at 9:02 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Clinton never had a surplus
Correct. BamaAtl understands money about as well as my wife.
Posted on 1/14/17 at 9:02 am to Jake88
quote:
That less than half the rate that Obama added to the national debt.
January 2008 - Debt at $10.6 Trillion
Debt today - $20 Trillion
Difference $9.4 Trillion
Some of that $9.4 Trillion was done on Bush's watch as some of the debt on Trump's watch will be done on Obama's
But....$9 Trillion is not double $9.4 Trillion....
Is it too much? Who knows...what it categorically is not is conservatism and thank god for that....the conservative movement died the day Mitt Romney lost the 2012 election...and good riddance to bad rubbish....
The GDP for 2016 was about $19 Trillion. The debt was $19.4 Trillion. That would be akin to someone with an income of $100 K holding a mortgage of $102,000. Unless that person has some serious credit issues in the past there ain't a bank in the world who would rush to make that mortgage. Average income in the US is close to $60K and the average mortgage is $220K. For the nation as a whole to be in the same level of debt as the average home owner we would have a national debt of close to $80 trillion.
For those of you who are still conservatives here is the dirty little secret....the GOP only talked about the debt as being a bad thing because they could blame it all on democrats....that is not the case now my friend. Every red penny added to the debt is going to laid squarely at the feet of the GOP....and they, like the democrats, know that this country has no more business operating on a pay as you go basis than the average home owner does because it would cripple cash flow and destroy the economy.
When you compare the networth of the nation compared to that of individuals...even individuals who we all would agree are incredibly financially succesful...the United States as a whole makes them look like paupers.
This is one of the things about government that Donald Trump understands better than more than 99.9% of even very successful individuals....even more so than his peers, by all accounts....and that is finance and leverage and using debt as an asset and not a liability.
This is a huge reason why so many people in this country are employees and not employers....the thought of all that debt and all that risk intimidates them. It doesn't bother people with a risk takers mind-set like Donald Trump...and the enjoy the benefits of being more risk tolerant than their neighbors.
For the last 36 years y'all have been sold a bill of goods aimed at tapping into your wage slave mentality where debt is risk and risk is bad. In reality debt is opportunity and opportunity is the stuff that dreams are made of....opportunity is the thing that drives people from their relatively safe lives in third world shite holes to get to the United States or the UK or Europe and roll the dice and see what their point is....
Properly managed debt is the only way to get ahead and build wealth. Of course use it to buy TV's and the like and you will soon find yourself really bankrupt and not the creditor slapping kind of bankruptcy our president elect has filed a couple of 3 or so times....
Posted on 1/14/17 at 9:03 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
DisplacedBuckeye
Why does fiscal policy not matter anymore? Why are you okay with adding $9 Trillion worth of debt, just to repeal ACA?
Are you that hard up for >20M people to lose their insurance?
Posted on 1/14/17 at 9:05 am to BamaAtl
quote:
Why does fiscal policy not matter anymore? Why are you okay with adding $9 Trillion worth of debt, just to repeal ACA?
Link to where I've said any of that.
Hint: I haven't, I just won't let you lie about Clinton.
quote:
Are you that hard up for >20M people to lose their insurance?
I'd prefer they didn't, but I'm not willing to continue paying for it to make that happen.
Popular
Back to top


1



