- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Obama judge denies DOJ request to unseal grand jury testimony of GM.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 10:34 am to Mushroom1968
Posted on 8/11/25 at 10:34 am to Mushroom1968
Duh. She named a bunch of democrats.
0
Posted on 8/11/25 at 10:44 am to Decatur
quote:
They’ve released all kinds of investigative files related to the Russia investigation and all of the investigations of the investigations. And apparently there are new investigations of the investigations yet the Trump admin seems to have no problem releasing files in conjunction with these new investigations.
Your inability to accept, and unwillingness to understand, the difference between releasing factual information that is already known to the public ("Russia Russia Russia!!!" and the associated subpoenas / convened Grand Juries) versus what is an active investigation re: Epstein's network is not by chance.
You practice active manipulation in your political commentary here, and it is both tiresome/predictable.
"Trump bad. Dems innocent. Damn the evidence."
Posted on 8/11/25 at 10:48 am to DByrd2
quote:
versus what is an active investigation re: Epstein's network is not by chance.
The only thing material I can think of is Maxwell’s appeal is ongoing. What is else is there?
quote:
You practice active manipulation in your political commentary here,
Good stuff
Posted on 8/11/25 at 11:01 am to Decatur
quote:
The only thing material I can think of is Maxwell’s appeal is ongoing. What is else is there?
Manipulation by not even mentioning that there is an active investigation ongoing regarding Epstein himself and his connections. Why tf would the government have talked with Maxwell about this and moved her to a different prison if this weren't the case? Intentionally dense to push your preferred narrative.
quote:
Good stuff
Today's lesson in Decatur 101:
Accusation received > Passive sarcasm to avoid addressing it > Release from liability via deflection
Posted on 8/11/25 at 11:10 am to DByrd2
quote:
Manipulation by not even mentioning that there is an active investigation ongoing regarding Epstein himself and his connections.
From Google AI Overview:
quote:
Recent statements from the US Justice Department (DOJ) and the FBI indicate that their investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his associates has largely concluded and that no further charges are expected in connection with the case.
Specifically, the DOJ and FBI found no evidence that Epstein had a "client list" or blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his activities. The agencies also reaffirmed their conclusion that Epstein died by suicide in his jail cell in 2019, consistent with previous findings, according to NPR and ABC News.
What else am I missing?
quote:
Why tf would the government have talked with Maxwell about this and moved her to a different prison if this weren't the case?
I don’t think this is a strong inference to make and I note that it’s an inference in first place. Is there anything you can actually hang your hat on?
Posted on 8/11/25 at 11:32 am to ronricks
Posted on 8/11/25 at 12:47 pm to Houag80
Brcause prominent dems are named and Trump is not!
Posted on 8/11/25 at 2:16 pm to Decatur
quote:
From Google AI Overview
quote:
What else am I missing?
Cognitive prowess.
quote:
I don’t think this is a strong inference to make and I note that it’s an inference in first place.
Ok Mr. Brain Wave, why would a convicted human trafficker be met by federal authorities to give information regarding her former employer unless there were an open and active investigation of some sort against said employer?
quote:
Is there anything you can actually hang your hat on?
That your manipulation game is far superior to most, but not invincible.
But, if you insist, these are some good hat racks:
PBS Story from July on the Meeting in Relationship to Epstein
ABC News Link Where She Met with Them for Two Days
Qutoe from the ABC article:
quote:
Separately, on Wednesday, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer issued a subpoena for Maxwell for a deposition to occur at the prison on Aug. 11.
"The facts and circumstances surrounding both your and Mr. Epstein's cases have received immense public interest and scrutiny," Comer wrote in a statement Wednesday.
Today, you say!?
(They did their best to shape the narrative that it was strictly related to her appeal... They failed to note that in relation to her appeal, it may indeed depend on information she gleaned in the meetings.)
"The Justice Department will share additional information about what we learned at the appropriate time." - AP Article Quoting DOJ official
And in case you thought the deposition was a rumor, here is the link to it on the House of Representatives' official website:
My money don't "jiggle jiggle", it "folds"...
Mental gymnastics routine by Decatur in 3... 2... 1...
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News