- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NOAA Caught Adjusting Big Freeze out of Existence
Posted on 2/20/18 at 12:13 pm to GumboPot
Posted on 2/20/18 at 12:13 pm to GumboPot
Lol as if an article ending in frick trump should be taken seriously either. These are so misleading it’s ridiculous. Waiting for a breitbart article and asking people to prove them wrong is somehow more productive than going to a damn museum and asking how they’re fudging data. Downvote away.
1
Posted on 2/20/18 at 12:16 pm to Salmon
quote:
And FWIW, the overall percent of change for 1943 after the adjustments of land temperatures was -0.1 C.
Within the margin of error?
Posted on 2/20/18 at 12:29 pm to CAD703X
quote:
so again, please tell me how the fact these pseudo-science quasi-government entities who are given BILLIONS to study "CLIMATE CHANGE" can conduct a single experiment without bias.
You are going to have to be more specific on your biases.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 12:32 pm to GumboPot
What part of "consensus" do you not understand?
Posted on 2/20/18 at 12:51 pm to TejasHorn
quote:
fakebart lol.
So NOAA hasn't been adjusting data?
Posted on 2/20/18 at 12:56 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
So NOAA hasn't been adjusting data?
They have. They have also been very transparent on their methods and why.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 1:05 pm to Salmon
quote:
The NOAA adjustments have been know for quite awhile and have been thoroughly explained.
No they haven't
For example: if NOAA adjusted older temp data down, as that area became an 'urban heat island', then why arent newer stations data adjusted up when 'estimating' rural areas that didn't historically have a measuring station?
Also, why dont they adjust ship engine room intake data downward, rather than buoy data up, when we know ships engines warm that water
quote:
NOAA argues that the transition to buoys introduced a spurious cooling bias into the record. ERIs tend to warm the water a bit before measuring it (ship engine rooms being rather hot), whereas buoys do not.
They openly admit when something doesn't go their way, they trash the data
Posted on 2/20/18 at 1:20 pm to RobbBobb
They have. Everything you stated is either wrong or misleading. The info is out there. If you were serious about educating yourself about it, you would.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 1:26 pm to Salmon
quote:
They have. Everything you stated is either wrong or misleading. The info is out there. If you were serious about educating yourself about it, you would.
If you get me the links I will read them.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 1:31 pm to GumboPot
I don't doubt the manipulation of data, but I'm going to need more proof than the ramblings of a climate change skeptic's blog.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 1:39 pm to Brazoria Bengal
Do people still think global warming is a real thing
Posted on 2/20/18 at 1:46 pm to GumboPot
LOL Breihtbart 
Okay there bud I know the rules of this board so I apologize for laughing
Fits agenda = real and trustworthy news
Doesn't fit agenda = Fake news
Source doesn't matter. You may continue now sheep.
Okay there bud I know the rules of this board so I apologize for laughing Fits agenda = real and trustworthy news
Doesn't fit agenda = Fake news
Source doesn't matter. You may continue now sheep.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 1:51 pm to Salmon
quote:
Well you could just go to the NOAA or NASA
you know that's pointless to post those. They will just call it fake news and claim that everyone working for them are liberal elites that are all in on "it" whatever "it" is
Posted on 2/20/18 at 1:51 pm to starsandstripes
quote:
It's really bad when scientists are willing to do these things. I find it ironic that on college campuses around the country, classes on research methods and research ethics are held every semester. No one going into a research career can escape a class on methods. All preach objectivity. But then politics get involved and these scientists abandon their training, guidelines, and signed statements.
THIS
Posted on 2/20/18 at 3:04 pm to GumboPot
This is an article from Breitbart based on the report of a Fox News contributor.
Hoodwood made the same accusations in 2015 and was fact checked into submission.
But of course, most of the Baws on here think that fact checkers are fake news too.
If someone posted an CNN article on here supporting climate change, you won't even open it.
BTW Homewood's blog where he posted his "report" is called notalotofpeopleknowthat.
Sounds pretty scientific to me.
Hoodwood made the same accusations in 2015 and was fact checked into submission.
But of course, most of the Baws on here think that fact checkers are fake news too.
If someone posted an CNN article on here supporting climate change, you won't even open it.
BTW Homewood's blog where he posted his "report" is called notalotofpeopleknowthat.
Sounds pretty scientific to me.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 3:08 pm to olddawg26
quote:
Lol as if an article ending in frick trump should be taken seriously either.
Careful, now - ALL of the MSM is in "frick Trump" mode all the time. Denying that is a danger to your credibility.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News