- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/19/19 at 6:04 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Special Council Spokesman just publically debunked the BuzzFeed Story as totally false.
Special Counsel's statement:
quote:Please explain how the SC's statement debunked the BuzzFeed story as "totally false".
"BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate."
Does "not accurate" = "totally false".
What specific parts of the BuzzFeed story did the SC's statement say were totally false?
Posted on 1/19/19 at 6:08 pm to texridder
Cling to it, there is still a chance! 
Page 9 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News