- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: McDaniel grasping at straws, fabricating stats.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 5:28 pm to Rebman601
Posted on 6/29/14 at 5:28 pm to Rebman601
quote:That would be one hell of a bonus from Cash for Titles. Wait that was your old job when you worked in finance. Now you are an attorney. Make up your mind.
I would bet my balls I've mad more in the six months of this year than you've made in any 5 years of your "career" (not sure if welfare is considered a career by you?).
ETA - do I get to choose the method of extraction of said balls?
This post was edited on 6/29/14 at 5:47 pm
Posted on 6/29/14 at 5:36 pm to Rebman601
Somehow I think the opposite is true. Just so you know, taxpayers over 45 now pay 70 percent of all income taxes, compared with 60 percent in 1997. For baby boomers, the number is about 50 percent.
Like I said, spout your unfounded rhetoric all you want.
Like I said, spout your unfounded rhetoric all you want.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 5:44 pm to wfeliciana
And I'm sure poor blacks from MS can find tailored numbers to make them look important to the economy also. You are a blind fool if you think baby boomers are doing anything but hurting the country.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 5:46 pm to Rebman601
You know Reb, you just keep showing you intellectual talents.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 5:47 pm to wfeliciana
And you clearly don't know what classifies someone as a baby boomer. It appears that I'm arguing with an idiot. I can't feel good about making an idiot look dumb.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 5:50 pm to Diamondawg
Unless you were clearing a few hundred grand a year, it doesn't matter, and we both know you have never been near that number.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 5:50 pm to Rebman601
You know Rebman, you are a troll. You troll several boards. I engaged with you here but I've feed you enough today.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 5:54 pm to beachreb61
quote:
Ingalls would be gone if not for Cochran.
Too big to fail?
Posted on 6/29/14 at 6:01 pm to wfeliciana
I'd run too if I had said those same foolish things. Hey bud I pay a few hundred k a year in taxes. I'm sure you'll enjoy mooching off that for all your healthcare needs.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 6:05 pm to Rebman601
quote:
'd run too if I had said those same foolish things. Hey bud I pay a few hundred k a year in taxes. I'm sure you'll enjoy mooching off that for all your healthcare needs.
I don't mooch now and I won't much in the future. You are a good troll though since you do know how to make unfounded accusations. And good for you that you are so rich.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 6:11 pm to Rebman601
quote:Then you are a stupid evening supervisor at Cash for Titles/attorney. You need to change your H&R Block offices. Surely a better one could save you a couple of grand.
Hey bud I pay a few hundred k a year in taxes
Posted on 6/29/14 at 10:34 pm to Diamondawg
Funny thing is jim hood polled very well against mcdaniel
Posted on 6/29/14 at 10:55 pm to prplhze2000
quote:
Funny thing is jim hood polled very well against mcdaniel
Wonder why Hood didn't run for Senator. He's a hell of a better candidate than Childers. Is he more interested in Jackson or DC?
Posted on 6/30/14 at 7:37 am to RebelExpress38
Ingalls Is not too big to fail. It is possibly vulnerable to other states' politicians if we have no political protections ourselves.
This post was edited on 6/30/14 at 7:38 am
Posted on 6/30/14 at 8:24 am to beachreb61
For government contracts. If it shifted towards producing ships for the private sector it wouldn't need so much political protection. I'm sure all those destroyers are great but when your demand is determined by politicians your business model is pretty terrible.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 8:35 am to RebelExpress38
Not flaming, but this is naive. Most if not all defense contractors would fail if thy could only build for the private sector.
Military readiness is important to the survival of USA.
Military readiness is important to the survival of USA.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 9:39 am to Diamondawg
quote:
Isn't that what he is basing part of his challenge on; voting in the Republican runoff but voting Democrat in November?
No. Entirely different scenario. It's perfectly fine for a voter who voted for his or her Party's candidate in the primary to then vote for the opposition in the general. What's "illegal," but unenforceable, is for a voter to cross over in the primary, then back to his or her own side in the general.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 9:52 am to BrookhavenBengal
quote:No. What's illegal is to vote one way in the primary and crossover in the runoff. That's enforceable if done correctly.
No. Entirely different scenario. It's perfectly fine for a voter who voted for his or her Party's candidate in the primary to then vote for the opposition in the general. What's "illegal," but unenforceable, is for a voter to cross over in the primary, then back to his or her own side in the general.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 10:05 am to Diamondawg
He does not even have to find 7000 votes. Just enough to cast a doubt.
1500 in 1 county alone already.
1500 in 1 county alone already.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 10:47 am to darkhorse
quote:
He does not even have to find 7000 votes. Just enough to cast a doubt.
1500 in 1 county alone already.
quote:Some people don't think so
Neither argument will work. In the first case, there are almost certainly not enough Democratic primary/GOP runoff ballots to make up the nearly 7,000-vote gap between McDaniel and incumbent Sen. Thad Cochran. And in the second case, McDaniel backers are chucking very large rocks in very fragile glass houses. You know who may not support the party's candidate in November? A gentleman named Chris McDaniel.
Popular
Back to top


1




