Started By
Message

re: McDaniel grasping at straws, fabricating stats.

Posted on 6/29/14 at 5:28 pm to
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
38258 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

I would bet my balls I've mad more in the six months of this year than you've made in any 5 years of your "career" (not sure if welfare is considered a career by you?).
That would be one hell of a bonus from Cash for Titles. Wait that was your old job when you worked in finance. Now you are an attorney. Make up your mind.

ETA - do I get to choose the method of extraction of said balls?
This post was edited on 6/29/14 at 5:47 pm
Posted by wfeliciana
Member since Oct 2013
4505 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 5:36 pm to
Somehow I think the opposite is true. Just so you know, taxpayers over 45 now pay 70 percent of all income taxes, compared with 60 percent in 1997. For baby boomers, the number is about 50 percent.

Like I said, spout your unfounded rhetoric all you want.
Posted by Rebman601
Tejas
Member since May 2010
2689 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 5:44 pm to
And I'm sure poor blacks from MS can find tailored numbers to make them look important to the economy also. You are a blind fool if you think baby boomers are doing anything but hurting the country.
Posted by wfeliciana
Member since Oct 2013
4505 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 5:46 pm to
You know Reb, you just keep showing you intellectual talents.
Posted by Rebman601
Tejas
Member since May 2010
2689 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 5:47 pm to
And you clearly don't know what classifies someone as a baby boomer. It appears that I'm arguing with an idiot. I can't feel good about making an idiot look dumb.
Posted by Rebman601
Tejas
Member since May 2010
2689 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 5:50 pm to
Unless you were clearing a few hundred grand a year, it doesn't matter, and we both know you have never been near that number.
Posted by wfeliciana
Member since Oct 2013
4505 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 5:50 pm to
You know Rebman, you are a troll. You troll several boards. I engaged with you here but I've feed you enough today.
Posted by RebelExpress38
In your base, killin your dudes
Member since Apr 2012
14300 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

Ingalls would be gone if not for Cochran.



Too big to fail?
Posted by Rebman601
Tejas
Member since May 2010
2689 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 6:01 pm to
I'd run too if I had said those same foolish things. Hey bud I pay a few hundred k a year in taxes. I'm sure you'll enjoy mooching off that for all your healthcare needs.
Posted by wfeliciana
Member since Oct 2013
4505 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

'd run too if I had said those same foolish things. Hey bud I pay a few hundred k a year in taxes. I'm sure you'll enjoy mooching off that for all your healthcare needs.


I don't mooch now and I won't much in the future. You are a good troll though since you do know how to make unfounded accusations. And good for you that you are so rich.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
38258 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

Hey bud I pay a few hundred k a year in taxes
Then you are a stupid evening supervisor at Cash for Titles/attorney. You need to change your H&R Block offices. Surely a better one could save you a couple of grand.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
58094 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 10:34 pm to
Funny thing is jim hood polled very well against mcdaniel
Posted by TigerNAtux
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2007
18622 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 10:55 pm to
quote:

Funny thing is jim hood polled very well against mcdaniel


Wonder why Hood didn't run for Senator. He's a hell of a better candidate than Childers. Is he more interested in Jackson or DC?
Posted by beachreb61
Long Beach, MS
Member since Nov 2009
1715 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 7:37 am to
Ingalls Is not too big to fail. It is possibly vulnerable to other states' politicians if we have no political protections ourselves.
This post was edited on 6/30/14 at 7:38 am
Posted by RebelExpress38
In your base, killin your dudes
Member since Apr 2012
14300 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 8:24 am to
For government contracts. If it shifted towards producing ships for the private sector it wouldn't need so much political protection. I'm sure all those destroyers are great but when your demand is determined by politicians your business model is pretty terrible.
Posted by beachreb61
Long Beach, MS
Member since Nov 2009
1715 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 8:35 am to
Not flaming, but this is naive. Most if not all defense contractors would fail if thy could only build for the private sector.

Military readiness is important to the survival of USA.
Posted by BrookhavenBengal
Brookhaven, MS
Member since Oct 2007
3604 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 9:39 am to
quote:

Isn't that what he is basing part of his challenge on; voting in the Republican runoff but voting Democrat in November?


No. Entirely different scenario. It's perfectly fine for a voter who voted for his or her Party's candidate in the primary to then vote for the opposition in the general. What's "illegal," but unenforceable, is for a voter to cross over in the primary, then back to his or her own side in the general.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
38258 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 9:52 am to
quote:

No. Entirely different scenario. It's perfectly fine for a voter who voted for his or her Party's candidate in the primary to then vote for the opposition in the general. What's "illegal," but unenforceable, is for a voter to cross over in the primary, then back to his or her own side in the general.
No. What's illegal is to vote one way in the primary and crossover in the runoff. That's enforceable if done correctly.
Posted by darkhorse
Member since Aug 2012
7701 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 10:05 am to
He does not even have to find 7000 votes. Just enough to cast a doubt.

1500 in 1 county alone already.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
38258 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 10:47 am to
quote:

He does not even have to find 7000 votes. Just enough to cast a doubt.

1500 in 1 county alone already.
quote:

Neither argument will work. In the first case, there are almost certainly not enough Democratic primary/GOP runoff ballots to make up the nearly 7,000-vote gap between McDaniel and incumbent Sen. Thad Cochran. And in the second case, McDaniel backers are chucking very large rocks in very fragile glass houses. You know who may not support the party's candidate in November? A gentleman named Chris McDaniel.
Some people don't think so
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram