- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Man dead after refusing to show police ID
Posted on 2/28/14 at 12:23 pm to DawgfaninCa
Posted on 2/28/14 at 12:23 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:in Georgia, you can only be asked to identify yourself as part of a loitering/prowling potential charge (needs to be probably cause to think you are loitering/prowling). Showing an ID is not required.
DawgfaninCa
Posted on 2/28/14 at 12:24 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
Oh, yeah, God forbid a cop get a bloody nose... ...right?
Why should a cop be required to give someone the opportunity to give them a bloody nose?
Posted on 2/28/14 at 12:25 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
You don't have the right to privacy when you are in public or when the police suspect you of committing a crime.
Sure I do. They'll probably charge me with some bullshite like obstructing though.
Posted on 2/28/14 at 12:26 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:You are entitled to your own opinion. You are NOT entitled to your own facts. The only facts known are that the deceased did not hit the 19y/o which was cause of the police presence, and those facts established by the video.
The police officers weren't subduing a limp, lifeless, motionless, unconscious person. They were subduing a large man who was resisting them.
The video makes it apparent the police officers were in fact subduing a limp, lifeless, motionless, unconscious person. As far as I can tell, there is no point at which the dead man so much as flinches, much less moves purposefully.
Did you see anything different?
Posted on 2/28/14 at 12:27 pm to Tigah in the ATL
quote:
in Georgia, you can only be asked to identify yourself as part of a loitering/prowling potential charge (needs to be probably cause to think you are loitering/prowling). Showing an ID is not required.
So are you saying in Georgia if the cops stop you because they have probable cause to suspect that you murdered someone then you are not required to show your ID when asked?
Posted on 2/28/14 at 12:29 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
I've been arrested and locked up for days in general population when I was innocent of the charges but I was a man and fully cooperated with the police when they arrested me.
I was cooperative. I didn't cause anyone any trouble. But what I saw in there was sobering.
quote:
Grow some balls and stop acting like a whiny bitch.
You obviously didn't do your time in OPP.
...and talk about being a whiny bitch, those cops were afraid an unarmed man might "injure" one of them? ...so they killed him? What was one man going to do against 5 cops?
Posted on 2/28/14 at 12:32 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
Why should a cop be required to give someone the opportunity to give them a bloody nose?
So you would be ok during a traffic stop for cops to force you out of the car, throw you to the ground and hog tie you so they can get your personal info without the danger of getting a bloody nose?
Posted on 2/28/14 at 12:37 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
The only facts known are that the deceased did not hit the 19y/o which was cause of the police presence, and those facts established by the video.
Another fact is the police went to the scene because someone called them and told them that a domestic dispute had occurred but the person did not tell the police who caused the domestic dispute. Therefore, when the police arrived on the scene they wanted to talk to the father because they suspected he may have been the cause of the dispute which is a reasonable assumption on the part of the police. When the man who by the way was large refused to show his ID the police attempted to detain him using reasonable physical force.
quote:
The video makes it apparent the police officers were in fact subduing a limp, lifeless, motionless, unconscious person. As far as I can tell, there is no point at which the dead man so much as flinches, much less moves purposefully.
Are you claiming the man was limp, lifeless, motionless and unconscious when the police first attempted to use physical force to detain him?
This post was edited on 2/28/14 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 2/28/14 at 12:41 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:that is correct. Otherwise, only if you are arrested do you have to identify yourself (or at a traffic stop).
So are you saying in Georgia if the cops stop you because they have probable cause to suspect that you murdered someone then you are not required to show your ID when asked?
My point is these laws are different in different states. That said, I fully expect a cop would be a complete cock about it if I were asked for my ID & I refused.
Posted on 2/28/14 at 12:41 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
Another fact is the police went to the scene because someone called them and told them that a domestic dispute had occurred but the person did not tell the police who caused the domestic dispute. Therefore, when the police arrived on the scene they wanted to talk to the father because they suspected he may have been the cause of the dispute which is a reasonable assumption on the part of the police. When the man who by the way was large refused to show his ID they police attempted to detain him using reasonable physical force.
People aren't robots. You have an emotional man who's upset because his wife and daughter are arguing and he's being targeted.
Cops should be trained to handle those kind of situations without violence. They aren't. They are trained to prevent violence with violence at almost any cost.
I feel for the guy, he had a right to be upset. The world wouldn't have ended if the cops let the guy walk and talked to the other two parties.
Posted on 2/28/14 at 12:42 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:Wait!
Don't lay that bullshite on me.
I've been arrested and locked up for days in general population when I was innocent of the charges but I was a man and fully cooperated with the police when they arrested me.
You post that, and followed with this?
quote:
Grow some balls and stop acting like a whiny bitch.
Fellow, unless there is another substantial chapter to that story, you and I define "Growing some balls" verrrry differently.
I can guarantee from this end, given that scenario, it is a story that would not end well for the PoPo or others involved.
Posted on 2/28/14 at 12:43 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:also, I posted the GA law because I read your name as Dawg in Fannin Co.
DawgfaninCa
Posted on 2/28/14 at 12:43 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
So you would be ok during a traffic stop for cops to force you out of the car, throw you to the ground and hog tie you so they can get your personal info without the danger of getting a bloody nose?
Stop making up an absurd scenario in a feeble attempt to prove your point of view is correct.
If the police stopped me during a traffic stop I would get my driver's license out and immediately show it to them because I know they are going to want to see it.
Posted on 2/28/14 at 12:46 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
Why should a cop be required to give someone the opportunity to give them a bloody nose?
Indeed.
Maybe you should ask the girl - that is, the HANDCUFFED, SEATED, GIRL - in the photo.
[...I'm starting to think you're just trolling at this point.]
Posted on 2/28/14 at 12:49 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Fellow, unless there is another substantial chapter to that story, you and I define "Growing some balls" verrrry differently.
In this case, growing some balls means stop acting like a little girl who has a male authority complex.
Posted on 2/28/14 at 12:50 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
Maybe you should ask the girl - that is, the HANDCUFFED, SEATED, GIRL - in the photo.
So you don't think girls can seriously injure a police officer?
Posted on 2/28/14 at 12:51 pm to DawgfaninCa
is there more than one video in this thread?
Specifically is there any more video of the fight or the actions prior to the last few minutes of this guys life?
Specifically is there any more video of the fight or the actions prior to the last few minutes of this guys life?
Posted on 2/28/14 at 12:51 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
stop acting like a little girl who has a male authority complex.
Like cops and game wardens jumping one guy and killing him?
Posted on 2/28/14 at 12:51 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:That is assertion, not fact.
Another fact is the police went to the scene because someone called them and told them that a domestic dispute had occurred but the person did not tell the police
quote:That is assertion, not fact.
When the man who by the way was large refused to show his ID the police attempted to detain him using reasonable physical force.
quote:Do you know what a video is?
Are you claiming the man was limp, lifeless, motionless and unconscious when the police first attempted to use physical force to detain him?
Do you know what video refers to in this case?
Have you watched the video?
Do you see the portion where 5 cops are on top of the deceased?
Do you ever, in the entire video, see any evidence of consciousness on the part of the dead man?
Do you see the cops trying to prop him up after they've likely killed him? You see them sticking their legs behind him to keep him from flopping lifelessly to the pavement?
¿Comprende?
Posted on 2/28/14 at 12:56 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
People aren't robots. You have an emotional man who's upset because his wife and daughter are arguing and he's being targeted.
Cops should be trained to handle those kind of situations without violence. They aren't. They are trained to prevent violence with violence at almost any cost.
I feel for the guy, he had a right to be upset. The world wouldn't have ended if the cops let the guy walk and talked to the other two parties.
bullshite.
Cops are trained to handle most situations without violence.
However, in this case the police reasonable suspected that the father might have been the person who was violent in the domestic dispute and therefore could be violent towards them.
Popular
Back to top


1




