- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Law Requiring Racial And LGBT Corporate Board Members Deemed Unconstitutional
Posted on 4/2/22 at 12:59 pm
Posted on 4/2/22 at 12:59 pm
quote:
A Los Angeles judge has ruled that California’s landmark law mandating that corporate boards have ethnic or LGBT members violates the state Constitution.
Friday’s brief ruling granted summary judgment to Judicial Watch, a conservative legal group that sought a permanent injunction against the measure. The lawsuit argued it was illegal to use taxpayer funds to enforce a law that violates the equal protection clause of the California Constitution by mandating a quota based on race, ethnicity, sexual preference, and transgender status.
Judge begone!
Just like a court case should be filed over the SCOTUS Nominee!
Posted on 4/2/22 at 1:01 pm to Jjdoc
quote:And state funded educational institutions of higher learning.
Just like a court case should be filed over the SCOTUS Nominee!
Posted on 4/2/22 at 1:29 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
Just like a court case should be filed over the SCOTUS Nominee!
I don't care if a black woman is the best nominated and confirmed as long as she judges according to the constitution.
However, I have a major problem with announcing that you are not going to consider anyone but a black woman. That is racist and unconstitutional to the hilt.
Posted on 4/2/22 at 1:46 pm to Jjdoc
Turns out saying you can't discriminate based on race, ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation means you can't discriminate based on race, ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation.
Posted on 4/2/22 at 2:25 pm to Jjdoc
Always will be unconstitutional for anyone with a brain.
Posted on 4/2/22 at 2:27 pm to Jjdoc
I see HHTM / Mickey greased up your down button there, JJ.
Posted on 4/2/22 at 2:55 pm to squid_hunt
Let’s get the Rooney rule over turned next please.
Posted on 4/2/22 at 3:06 pm to Jjdoc
Eh this doesn’t apply to the new SCOTUS judge. One was legislated the other was simply his preference. Not saying it wasn’t wrong but it doesn’t meet the standard for being unconstitutional
Popular
Back to top

6






