- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/11/26 at 4:51 pm to lsuguy84
quote:
we can discuss other underlying issues.
Maybe like how you never post anything of any substance in any thread on any topic.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 4:52 pm to lsuguy84
Posted on 7/11/26 at 4:54 pm to Bunk Moreland
The glowies are helping keep a thread active by trying to shut it down. Because they're retarded.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 5:01 pm to BoarEd
I stand with you pushing the envelope. 
Posted on 7/11/26 at 5:08 pm to BoarEd
And all of this changes the fact they recovered the fragmented pieces of a jacketed soft point .30 caliber round from Kirks body how? Or the fact that they have a 30.06 with Robinsons DNA on it and other .30 caliber jacketed soft point rounds with his DNA on them. It doesn't and it changes nothing.
This post was edited on 7/11/26 at 5:10 pm
Posted on 7/11/26 at 5:15 pm to MikkUGA
quote:
And all of this changes the fact they recovered the fragmented pieces of a jacketed soft point .30 caliber round from Kirks body how? Or the fact that they have a 30.06 with Robinsons DNA on it and other .30 caliber jacketed soft point rounds with his DNA on them.
Please show me where I suggested this changes the ballistics report?
Posted on 7/11/26 at 5:35 pm to BoarEd
People are pushing the narrative of a conspiracy theory of a microphone exploding for the reason they paved over it. Its not interesting because the evidence blows every one of those conspiracy theories out of the water.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 5:56 pm to MikkUGA
quote:
People are pushing the narrative of a conspiracy theory of a microphone exploding for the reason they paved over it.
That seems kind of ridiculous.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 6:18 pm to BoarEd
quote:
That seems kind of ridiculous.
I'm not trying to be combative with you and really haven't been trying to this whole time. I just want you to answer or drill down on what you think this paving incident means and why it's noteworthy
I get it, you think Robinson was MK Ultraed. But what would be the possible reasons for them to dig up the grass and pave the area for a coverup? You can't seem to answer and just deflect by saying "I'm not suggesting anything" or "I found it interesting, I'm just asking questions" or "it's not my job to read for you" or "I haven't paid much attention to this conspiracy theory" (which is a lie, you've made multiple threads about it the last few days and were posting about it as far back as April)
You have yet to actually say what you think this means, that's why you're catching so much shite. You posted it like it has some huge implications, and have yet to actually say what those implications are in your view.
It makes you look like a loon that can't defend his stance when you can't answer a simple question without mudslinging, calling people sheep and FEDS (still pretending like you don't know what a US Marshal does just makes you look unintelligent, not me), and acting like everyone else just isn't smart enough or on the leading edge of "questioning everything" enough to understand.
So tell us what it all means, Mr. Gatekeeper of Questioning™
Posted on 7/11/26 at 6:26 pm to MikkUGA
quote:
People are pushing the narrative of a conspiracy theory of a microphone exploding
As soon as they say “microphone”, quit engaging. They can’t be reasoned with.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 6:42 pm to RazorBroncs
quote:
I'm not trying to be combative with you and really haven't been trying to this whole time.
I'm still waiting for you to substantiate your claim that I'm blaming Jews for this shite.
quote:
But what would be the possible reasons for them to dig up the grass and pave the area for a coverup?
I don't know. But as a LEO yourself, you might be able to answer that for us. Put on your investigator hat for a second and try this thought experiment. If you had reason to believe that someone other than Robinson killed Kirk, or that more than one person may have been involved even if it was Robinson who shot him, why would you think that someone may want to remove all of the soil in the area after the incident took place? I don't have an answer to this. I'm not trying to claim anything specific happened here.
I know that seems odd to some of you people, but I truly am just trying to discuss a topic I find interesting.
Take for instance my thread on this stuff from yesterday. Same pattern. I presented something that people didn't like seeing and there was page after page of bickering, shilling the topic, etc. Nearly everything I posted drew criticism from a bunch of people. Until it got several pages deep and someone mentioned something about him being shot with a .30-06 palm pistol. To which I responded, "they do not make .30-06 palm pistols. The largest palm pistol manufactured is a .38 special. If this person's theory holds any water they will have had to have lied about the ballistics. I believe if a person were to fire a .30-06 palm pistol it might break their arm." (more likely the damn thing would blow up in their hand and they would blow their own hand off, but I digress). Where were the detractors there when I said that? Nowhere to be found. It contradicted what they read into my original post. You see, they assumed that I thought the guy was shot with a .30-06 palm pistol even though I never said as much. Then when I contradicted what they thought I had been saying, there was no recognition of this. Only silence.
"The mark of an educated mind is the ability to entertain an opposing notion without accepting it."
Aristotle
There don't seem to be many educated minds around here. Instead, there are a lot of people like yourself who seem determined to wrangle me into presenting a theory for what I think happened and I simply am not prepared to do so. I would think a professional LEO would understand this shite.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 7:10 pm to BoarEd
quote:
this stuff from yesterday. Same pattern. I presented something that people didn't like seeing
When you assume others motives in bad faith, don’t be shocked when you get the same.
No one is “troubled” by your asinine “the FBI paved the crime scene” thread. You have no literally zero direct evidence for that claim.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 7:11 pm to the808bass
quote:
When you assume others motives in bad faith
Link?
quote:
No one is "troubled"
This is laughable. You in particular seem very troubled over this thread, although I cannot understand why.
This post was edited on 7/11/26 at 7:13 pm
Posted on 7/11/26 at 7:12 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Instead, there are a lot of people like yourself who seem determined to wrangle me into presenting a theory for what I think happened and I simply am not prepared to do so. I would think a professional LEO would understand this shite.
Because YOU started the thread, Ed, so clearly you think it's significant and have some idea in your head as to why. You understand that, right?
It's not hard to understand why you'd have posters asking you why you think this is an important development when you're the one who obviously thought it was important enough to start a thread about.
"I'm just looking for discussion"
You're not. The people that point out that this makes no sense as a coverup are just brushed off and called names. The people that "question your questioning" are just brushed off as sheep and FEDS. Clearly you have some idea in your head, and anybody that doesn't figure out what Ole Ed is getting at is just not that intelligent even though Ole Ed himself can't even articulate what he's getting at.
quote:
But what would be the possible reasons for them to dig up the grass and pave the area for a coverup?
I don't know. But as a LEO yourself, you might be able to answer that for us
You started the thread, not me. I already gave you the reason they'd not want blood soaked grass in the middle of their public college campus earlier in the thread.
quote:
Put on your investigator hat for a second and try this thought experiment. If you had reason to believe that someone other than Robinson killed Kirk, or that more than one person may have been involved
I've had my "investigator hat" on since the moment this happened. I've seen the facts and considered the other viewpoints. I question a lot, but this is one of the most straightforward investigations you'll ever see. Why couldn't he have acted alone? He didn't do anything extraordinary or particularly hard. You're acting like he outpaced and outsmarted Secret Service at the White House or something. He climbed a ladder to a roof and pulled a trigger at a wide open target.
Not quite superhuman.
The problem you have is that you're STARTING from the assumption that he couldn't have acted alone or that Robinson didn't shoot him, then trying to make the pieces fit into that assumption. You're having to bend and contort and bring small things like landscaping into your puzzle, and even then it still doesn't fit.
You'd be a terrible detective or LEO.
The facts of the case are clearly laid out, and they paint a very obvious picture to anyone that isn't starting from a place of bias.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 7:17 pm to RazorBroncs
quote:
Because YOU started the thread, Ed, so clearly you think it's significant and have some idea in your head as to why. You understand that, right?
This is a thread meant to discuss newly released details about the murder scene. Not for me to present to you an alternative theory about what happened. You understand that, right?
quote:
The problem you have is that you're STARTING from the assumption that he couldn't have acted alone
Link?
Again, this is a thread meant for discussion about newly released details about the crime scene. I made no assumptions in the OP. I presented facts.
Now, in my last post I did ask you to imagine if you had reason to believe he may not have acted alone, but that is only because you were demanding me present you a theory that I wasn't prepared to present, as I was clear to point out. In other words, "if I were investigating this, I would not assume this, because I do not see any reason to." This should be obvious.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 7:19 pm to BoarEd
Disagreeing with retarded people isn’t a marker of being troubled.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 7:24 pm to the808bass
Spending an entire page trying to figure out why you disagree with a thread but being unable to put it into words is the marker of a troubled poster. Rational people would gather their thoughts and figure out what the frick it is they're actually trying to say before making multiple posts about it and being wrong every time.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 7:32 pm to BoarEd
Just like the pentagon after 911
Posted on 7/11/26 at 7:33 pm to BoarEd
You still haven’t even figured out that nothing you posted in the first post supports your claim.
The Feds need 10” off the top, stat!!
The Feds need 10” off the top, stat!!
Page 10 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News