Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Judge who ruled Trump accountants must comply with subpoena is an Obama appointee & donor

Posted on 5/21/19 at 3:46 pm
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
24724 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 3:46 pm
LINK

A federal judge ruled Monday that President Donald Trump's longtime accounting firm, Mazars USA LLP, must comply with a subpoena by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee requesting financial documents related to Trump and his businesses. But new information highlighted Monday revealed the ruling judge may have some political bias.

U.S. District Court Judge Amit Mehta, who was appointed by former President Barack Obama, defended the broad authority given to Congress to investigate the president.

Mehta ruled that while "there are limits on Congress's investigative authority ... those limits do not substantially constrain Congress."

Trump's legal team sued in federal court last month to block the subpoena. They argued the subpoena was politically motivated, and therefore, held no legislative purpose. Mehta, however, claimed it was not his job to determine whether or not the subpoena had a political motivation behind it.

"These are facially valid legislative purposes, and it is not for the court to question whether the Committee's actions are truly motivated by political considerations," Mehta said.

Financial records indicate that Mehta personally donated to Obama's re-election campaign in 2012.

Records show that Mehta donated $1,000 to the Obama/Biden re-election campaign on Sept. 17, 2012, then donated another $1,000 to the same campaign one month later on Oct. 16, 2012.

Trump's legal team filed an appeal Tuesday, sending the case to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. It's not clear when the appeals court will hear the case.
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62370 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 3:47 pm to
Breaking news ?
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
47589 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

new information
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
78912 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

Records show that Mehta donated $1,000 to the Obama/Biden re-election campaign on Sept. 17, 2012, then donated another $1,000 to the same campaign one month later on Oct. 16, 2012.


Standard protocol. They are humans who have political leanings, but to say this is political bias (even though we know it is) based on this is silly.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79615 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

Mehta ruled that while "there are limits on Congress's investigative authority ... those limits do not substantially constrain Congress."


Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
39856 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

These are facially valid legislative purposes,


I don’t think reviewing Trump!s tax returns are ‘facially valid legislative purposes’.

If it was, it would be a requirement to run for office.

They want it valid? Pass a law to make tax returns public a requirement to run. Now THATS legislative.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram