- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge declares mistrial in case of Arizona rancher accused of killing illegal alien
Posted on 4/23/24 at 8:01 am to WPBTiger
Posted on 4/23/24 at 8:01 am to WPBTiger
I would not vote to convict in this situation. He has a right to protect his property from a foreign invader who has admitted to criminal conduct.
0
Posted on 4/23/24 at 8:15 am to WPBTiger
quote:
migrant who lived across the border in Nogales, Mexico
So, a tresspasser?
Posted on 4/23/24 at 9:18 am to WPBTiger
The article is titled “Judge declares mistrial” but not once do they talk about why there was a mistrial. Absolutely trash journalism.
Also:
Yeah, we smuggled drugs before, but we promise we weren’t this time!
Edit: from a different article:
This is big. You have a lot of Jurys that will compromise on charges. But the fact that they couldn’t reach a verdict on anything he was charged with means that there were people actually dug in and were not changing.
Also:
quote:
Ramirez testified that they were being smuggled into the United States and were not trafficking drugs. Ramirez admitted to smuggling marijuana on one previous occasion
Yeah, we smuggled drugs before, but we promise we weren’t this time!
Edit: from a different article:
quote:
“Based upon the jury’s inability to reach a verdict on any count,” Superior Court Judge Thomas Fink said, “This case is in mistrial.”
This is big. You have a lot of Jurys that will compromise on charges. But the fact that they couldn’t reach a verdict on anything he was charged with means that there were people actually dug in and were not changing.
This post was edited on 4/23/24 at 10:04 am
Posted on 4/23/24 at 9:25 am to WPBTiger
quote:
Cuen-Buitimea and another migrant were allegedly heading back to the southern side of the border when they passed through Kelly's cattle ranch.
These fricking people...
That's still called Mexico for now, right?
Posted on 4/23/24 at 10:14 am to WPBTiger
SSS
Posted on 4/23/24 at 10:52 am to tiger1014
quote:I don't see how you could declare a mistrial without doing so.
Did they poll the jury?]
My guess (and it IS just a guess) is that the judge asked that the headcount not be reported, in order to avoid tainting the jury pool for any possible re-trial. Of course, if that were the case, one would expect that fact to be reported, at a minimum.
The other possibility is that the reporters are just too incompetent to have understood the importance of polling the jury. I do not discount that possibility, either.
Posted on 4/23/24 at 11:00 am to idlewatcher
quote:
And not to mention that they couldn’t find the bullet that killed this guy. How do they know it was Kelly’s AR that killed him? How do they know it wasn’t a hunter?
Posted on 4/23/24 at 11:02 am to WPBTiger
Give the Rancher a Medal for Meritorious Service to his country and fellow citizens.
Posted on 4/23/24 at 12:45 pm to udtiger
[quote] migrant
I
L
L
E
G
A
L
A
L
I
E
N
This! This! This!
I
L
L
E
G
A
L
A
L
I
E
N
This! This! This!
This post was edited on 4/23/24 at 12:48 pm
Posted on 4/23/24 at 12:48 pm to WPBTiger
The identity of the lone downvote to the OP should be published here.
Posted on 4/23/24 at 12:49 pm to Covingtontiger77
That's BamaAtl.
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News