- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
J6 "Pipebomber": Feds change their story AGAIN about supposed alibi for Capitol Hill cop
Posted on 8/31/26 at 5:07 pm
Posted on 8/31/26 at 5:07 pm
Lots of smoke pointing to Capitol Hill police officer (now CIA employee) Shauni Kerkhoff as being the J6 Pipebomber. When that hit the fan, miracle of miracle, after almost 5 years of investigation, the FBI within a few days found that an autistic Trump supporter, Brian Cole, Jr. was the evil perpetrator.
According to Bondi, Pirro, Patel, Bongino, et al, the Fedsurrection narrative that most of us (including Bogino at one point) believe about the J6 "pipe bombs" (actually, inert training dummies) was not true because Kerkhoff had an alibi. She was on video (which has never been made public) at home in Falls Church playing with her puppies. When that was proven to be a lie (conservative media proved she didn't have puppies), the story changed to she was on video watching her adult dog. Turns out she wasn't ON the video, but you could definitely hear her voice.
Ooops. Apparently, someone found out that Kerkhoff was NOT in Falls Church on the night in question. In trying to keep the video away from Cole's defense team, DOJ know admits that they made a " clerical error." Kerkhoff was in ALEXANDRIA on the night in question.
How anybody has faith in this DOJ unraveling the J6 abuses (or Seth Rich's laptop, etc.) is beyond me.
According to Bondi, Pirro, Patel, Bongino, et al, the Fedsurrection narrative that most of us (including Bogino at one point) believe about the J6 "pipe bombs" (actually, inert training dummies) was not true because Kerkhoff had an alibi. She was on video (which has never been made public) at home in Falls Church playing with her puppies. When that was proven to be a lie (conservative media proved she didn't have puppies), the story changed to she was on video watching her adult dog. Turns out she wasn't ON the video, but you could definitely hear her voice.
Ooops. Apparently, someone found out that Kerkhoff was NOT in Falls Church on the night in question. In trying to keep the video away from Cole's defense team, DOJ know admits that they made a " clerical error." Kerkhoff was in ALEXANDRIA on the night in question.
How anybody has faith in this DOJ unraveling the J6 abuses (or Seth Rich's laptop, etc.) is beyond me.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. 
4
Posted on 8/31/26 at 5:18 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Brian Cole Jr trial: The prosecution makes a MAJOR correction.
In the prosecution's explanation for why the subpoena of the CIA officer should be denied, they stated that the FBI investigation established that the CIA agent was at home in Falls Church. Now they are claiming that she was not at home in Falls Church, but in Alexandria.
Why is this so complicated for anyone to get right????? NO LESS THAN THREE, FBI, or related sources, said that there was a video showing the agent "playing with her puppies". A story we saw change from "puppies" to "dog", and then "playing" to "watching the dog sleep", and then finally, that the agent was not actually seen on video. Does anyone at the FBI or the prosecution actually know or is this just one long game of telephone. How hard is it to get this right?
In the prosecution's explanation for why the subpoena of the CIA officer should be denied, they stated that the FBI investigation established that the CIA agent was at home in Falls Church. Now they are claiming that she was not at home in Falls Church, but in Alexandria.
Why is this so complicated for anyone to get right????? NO LESS THAN THREE, FBI, or related sources, said that there was a video showing the agent "playing with her puppies". A story we saw change from "puppies" to "dog", and then "playing" to "watching the dog sleep", and then finally, that the agent was not actually seen on video. Does anyone at the FBI or the prosecution actually know or is this just one long game of telephone. How hard is it to get this right?
Posted on 8/31/26 at 5:42 pm to IvoryBillMatt
"She was playing with her puppies"
Posted on 8/31/26 at 6:35 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
She was playing with her puppies
Yeah. It SOUNDED better:)
Posted on 8/31/26 at 6:39 pm to cajunangelle
Didn't The Blaze say it is Kerkhoff?
Posted on 8/31/26 at 7:15 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Didn't The Blaze say it is Kerkhoff?
They did, and I remember something about the Blaze dropping the story after they were criticize because they referenced her gait which was a near perfect match.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 7:19 pm to IvoryBillMatt
The funniest part was people knew the bitch is CIA and yet they accepted the obvious bullshite alibi anyways. People will believe anything the government tells them to believe. They actually CRAVE daddy government telling them what to think.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 7:20 pm to IvoryBillMatt
What do you think they had on Bongino and Patel? Patel seems completely content being honey potted but what about Bongino?
He talked a big game then folded on every issue he was yelling about on his podcast.
He talked a big game then folded on every issue he was yelling about on his podcast.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News