Started By
Message

re: It’s human rights.

Posted on 6/14/18 at 5:42 am to
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38249 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 5:42 am to
Posted by MSWebfoot
Hernando
Member since Oct 2011
3263 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 5:59 am to
Where were they when Obama was cuddling up with Cuba? No human rights have every been infringed there.
The end game with NK is denuclearization. What was the point with Cuba?
Posted by DEG
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2009
10530 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 6:14 am to
quote:

failing to hammer Kim on his human rights


I think most critics would be fine if he didn’t “hammer” Kim. The problem is, Trump all but apologized for him. Trump should have said that Kim’s human rights record is atrocious and it’s something we’ll prioritize once we address America’s safety after NoKo denukes.

Instead, he says some stupid shite about there being a lot of bad actors. It’s not that fricking hard.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67482 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 6:30 am to
quote:

This, coming from a bunch that murders 600K babies a year.

Human rights my arse.

This and maybe someone from the left should care about human rights in Chiraq, Baltimore or Memphis and then get back with me.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98613 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 6:33 am to
Well, in fairness, they have the example of all the human rights concessions/reforms Obama got in the Iran deal...
Posted by Stingray
Shreveport
Member since Sep 2007
12420 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 6:33 am to
No.

It's American rights.

He's an American president.

Our right not to be nuked.
Posted by homesicktiger
High altitude hell
Member since Oct 2004
1367 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 6:35 am to
He tiptoed around it, but ...

quote:

Trump all but apologized for him


absolutey did not happen. You’re a fricking liar, among other things.
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36597 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 6:41 am to
I am so confused at what the people talking about their human right record want. We have all known how shitty it is over there for ages and done jack shite.

If trump is evil for trying pacify them, then what are the rest of the admins that just let them waste way? Do they want war?
Posted by DEG
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2009
10530 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 10:05 am to
quote:

absolutey did not happen


Trump said, and I quote: "he loves his people" about one of the worst human rights offenders of this generation.

quote:

homesicktiger


You're an apologist cuck.

I'm right, "and everybody knows it".
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 10:40 am to
quote:


This, coming from a bunch that murders 600K babies a year.

Human rights my arse


Human rights and fetus rights are two different things
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
10900 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 10:48 am to
quote:

Human rights and fetus rights are two different things



It's not really, It's just the lefts way of explaining it so it seem less disgusting to kill a baby.

Face it, killing babies as a means of birth/population control will be looked at some day with the same disgust as owning another human being and counting them as property. But as with slavers it takes time for the disgusting sub-humans to die off or realize what they are doing is morally bankrupt.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 10:50 am to
quote:


Face it, killing babies as a means of birth/population control will be looked at some day with the same disgust as owning another human being and counting them as property


Doubt it. If anything we will trend towards eugenics which may ultimately bite the human race in the arse when we get hit by a superdisease
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
16917 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 10:53 am to
It's such a transparent talking point. We all know the nature of the North Korean regime. We are here because they have acquired nuclear weapons and our goal is to establish verifiable denuclearization of a dangerous state. They have been in tyrannical power for the better half of a century, this isn't anything new. The regime is an entrenched power. So we can have a tyrannical regime with nuclear weapons or we can lower our rhetoric in the aims of making them a less dangerous international actor who remains tyrannical domestically. The leftist talking point seems to suggest that denuclearization is not desirable unless it is coupled with the collapse of the regime, which of course is asinine on multiple levels.

Not to mention mutually beneficial agreements that potentially result in verifiable denuclearization in exchange for the cessation of American military exercises and lifting of trade sanctions could serve to soften the regime's domestic behaviors long term through the carrot of bettering relations with the international community and the rewards that brings. The left is behaving shamefully in their tireless quest to diminish anything that can be perceived as a victory for Trump.
This post was edited on 6/15/18 at 7:26 am
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59605 posts
Posted on 6/22/18 at 8:03 pm to
you sure do use cuck a lot
must be your fetish. pathetic.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram