Started By
Message

re: Is there a strategic reason we send tens, hundreds of billions of taxpayer $ to countries?

Posted on 11/3/24 at 8:38 am to
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89841 posts
Posted on 11/3/24 at 8:38 am to
The argument would be they then turn around and spend our currency. Keeping it the world currency.

I don’t have a problem helping people out. But we should spend whatever money to get vets off the street before a single penny is sent anywhere else.

This post was edited on 11/3/24 at 8:40 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477254 posts
Posted on 11/3/24 at 8:41 am to
quote:

Is there a strategic reason we send tens, hundreds of billions of taxpayer $ to countries?


Economic and security reasons. Disruptions in the international system create negative externalities, which are costly. They are more costly to the US, as we benefit the most from the current worldwide economic system (and our place therein).

So the theory is, if we send out $100B (to prevent the negative externalities) to save $400B in putative costs (that would come if this negative externalities occurred), we come out ahead, net.
Posted by prouddawg
Member since Sep 2024
9237 posts
Posted on 11/3/24 at 8:42 am to
Supplemental retirement plan for politicians
Posted by ELVIS U
Member since Feb 2007
11822 posts
Posted on 11/3/24 at 8:50 am to
So that our politicians can get rich off our money by skimming off the top. Every conflict we enter should begin with the question, what is our critical and vital interest in this conflict?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram