- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 10/29/20 at 8:38 pm to Dignan
quote:That would not only be more fascist than anything trump has done, it would be political suicide.
Then we’re going to pack the courts.
It polls absolutely horribly.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 8:39 pm to Dignan
quote:
Then we’re going to pack the courts.
I thought Trump was already packing the courts?
ETA: Upvoting your own post. That's fricking pathetic.
This post was edited on 10/29/20 at 8:40 pm
Posted on 10/29/20 at 8:41 pm to Dignan
quote:If dems take the senate, it would be by the skin of their teeth. 51-49 or 52-48
It’s ok, Centinel. The bad man is leaving now. You don’t have to be scared anymore.
good luck passing any bold legislation when you have joe manchin, sinema, etc rejecting the bold stuff.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 8:43 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
It polls absolutely horribly.
You’re not wrong about this. However, after what happened to Garland and then how the Republicans acted hypocritically with Coney Barrett.... Something has to be done.
And most of the country agrees with that. Not necessarily on how it’s accomplished (through packing the courts), but they want a balanced Supreme Court.
I actually want that too. I do t want us extreme in one direction or the other.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 8:45 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
good luck passing any bold legislation when you have joe manchin, sinema, etc rejecting the bold stuff.
That’s a good point. We’re far more likely to have someone open minded enough to jump ship, as opposed to current Republicans.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 8:47 pm to Dignan
quote:There was nothing hypocritical about it. Repubs had the senate both times.
However, after what happened to Garland and then how the Republicans acted hypocritically with Coney Barrett.... Something has to be done.
You don't think the dems would have done the exact same thing?
Posted on 10/29/20 at 8:48 pm to Dignan
quote:
That’s a good point. We’re far more likely to have someone open minded enough to jump ship, as opposed to current Republicans.
slept through the 2017 healthcare bill fiasco, did ya?
Posted on 10/29/20 at 8:50 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
slept through the 2017 healthcare bill fiasco, did ya?
That's different because reasons.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 8:52 pm to Centinel
I didn’t upvote my own post. Which one?
That’s kind of pathetic that it triggered you that much to think that someone else could like my post.
That’s kind of pathetic that it triggered you that much to think that someone else could like my post.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 8:52 pm to Dignan
quote:
I didn’t upvote my own post.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 8:55 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
It was completely hypocritical. If we can’t agree on that, we can’t really debate the issue.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 8:57 pm to Centinel
Which one? If there’s more than one upvote, umm... it’s something called math.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 9:00 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
You don't think the dems would have done the exact same thing?
I honestly don’t.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 9:00 pm to Dignan
quote:I disagree here. The idea was that because the senate and the presidency were opposite parties, they should wait until the next election.
It was completely hypocritical. If we can’t agree on that, we can’t really debate the issue.
This time around, it was same party so they went ahead and did it.
Even if garland was given a hearing and a vote, he wouldn't have been confirmed.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 9:01 pm to Dignan
quote:oh my gosh.
I honestly don’t.
the party that pulled out all the stops against bork, estrada, kavanaugh, etc wouldn't have played hardball? LMAO
Posted on 10/29/20 at 9:03 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Even if garland was given a hearing and a vote, he wouldn't have been confirmed.
That’s conjecture. I disagree.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 9:04 pm to Dignan
quote:
I honestly don’t.
Except history shows they did do the exact same thing. Multiple times.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 9:04 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
What does it matter? Biden is going to pack the courts. Again, I think it’s for the greater good.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 9:07 pm to Dignan
quote:He wasn't getting 60 votes
That’s conjecture. I disagree.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News