- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/15/17 at 11:03 am to oman
quote:
Dude. It's a clown show.
Meh, an editorial from the New Yorker probably isn't the most subjective piece to consider when evaluating a state that is essentially its ideological opposite.
I've heard this "Blue wave in Texas" crap for 15 years, and the only evidence ever provided is "but look at the demographics!" As if TX Hispanics represent a monolithic voting block. Or as if the urban centers of Austin, Dallas, and Houston could ever overcome the giant red piece of land surrounding it.
Election data just doesn't support it. And if the left is really dumb enough to try and run a TX Senate candidate on its national platform, they are just setting him up for failure.
This post was edited on 12/15/17 at 11:05 am
Posted on 12/15/17 at 11:09 am to MSMHater
quote:
Patrick has driven his chamber in a far more radical direction. Even Democratic senators are loath to cross him. In this year’s session, Patrick worked on lowering property taxes and addressing some obscure matters, such as hailstorm-lawsuit reform. But the heart of his agenda was legislation that spoke to the religious right, such as a bill that would provide vouchers for homeschooling and private-school tuition, and a “sermon safeguard” bill, which would prevent state and local officials from issuing subpoenas to members of the clergy or compelling them to testify. He also worked to toughen the state’s voter-I.D. law. Patrick’s legislative agenda, if passed in its entirety, would bend Texas farther in the direction of the affluent and, above all, would fortify the political strength of white evangelicals who feel threatened by the increasing number of minorities and by changing social mores.
OMG, the horror! What an extremely radical agenda!
Posted on 12/15/17 at 11:11 am to oman
quote:
Dude it’s a clown show
Forbes
#2 Best States for Business
#3 in Business Costs
#9 in Labor Supply
#21 in Regulatory Environment
#1 in Economic Climate
#2 in Growth Prospects
#30 in Quality of Life
Job growth: 2.2% (growing)
Projected Annual Job Growth
1.7%
Unemployment
4.7%
Median Household Income
$53,207
Household Income Growth
2.9%
Right to Work State
Yes
Union Workforce
4%
Dallas Fed link below. From Last month...
LINK
quote:
Texas employment expanded an annualized 6.4 percent in October, outpacing the nation’s 2.2 percent growth (Chart 1). Year to date, Texas employment has grown at a 2.7 percent annual rate. The Dallas Fed’s Texas Employment Forecast suggests 2.6 percent job growth in 2017 (December/December). The Texas unemployment rate dipped to 3.9 percent—its lowest point in the history of the series, which dates back to 1976. Unemployment also ticked down in all of Texas’ major metros and in the U.S. in October. Payroll expansion was broad based across the major metros in October, with Houston employment surging 9.5 percent following a 7.2 percent decline in September. Employment has expanded in all Texas major metros year to date, with San Antonio leading at 3.0 percent. Service sector employment has grown 2.4 percent this year through October, and goods sector employment is up 4.3 percent. Employment has expanded in all major sectors this year except information services, where it has declined 2.4 percent. Payrolls in oil and gas have increased the most at an annualized 13.1 percent year to date.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 11:16 am to MSMHater
quote:
Election data just doesn't support it.
Did election data support a Dem win in Alabama?
If blacks and hispanics stay home, the demographic changes have no effect. Just like they didn't in 2016. If they don't come to the polls in 2018, the demographic changes won't have an effect either.
Redistricting has had a big effect on tamping down the Dem electorate as well.
If you want to keep your head in the sand about the demographics, that is certainly fine with me.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 11:20 am to oman
Magician, you've got ADD.
You said that the state was well run, and then you point to a bunch of factors (that probably benefit from NO government).
The state isn't "well run". If you want to talk about its friendliness to business, that is another matter.
It's a gerrymandered shitstain of a government with a terrible educational system. But we do have jobs.
You said that the state was well run, and then you point to a bunch of factors (that probably benefit from NO government).
The state isn't "well run". If you want to talk about its friendliness to business, that is another matter.
It's a gerrymandered shitstain of a government with a terrible educational system. But we do have jobs.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 11:24 am to oman
quote:
Did election data support a Dem win in Alabama?
Is the Texas GOP running an alleged child molester? Hell, Cruz's taste for MILF porn actresses isn't even that bad.
quote:
Redistricting has had a big effect on tamping down the Dem electorate as well.
I agree with that. The opposite happens in other states as well, but you're right.
quote:
If you want to keep your head in the sand about the demographics, that is certainly fine with me
See, I think considering TX Hispanics as a monolithic voting bloc is burying your head in the sand. It's also very ostrich like to consider TX's demographics without regard to considering the national democratic agenda that a Senate candidate would have to carry in any race. It's just not a winning agenda here. Identity politics and wealth redistribution will not work on a state level scale here, IMHO.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 11:29 am to MSMHater
quote:
See, I think considering TX Hispanics as a monolithic voting bloc is burying your head in the sand.
I'm not saying that at all.
Do you think Ted Cruz or George W. Bush would appeal to Texas Hispanics more?
Do you think Ted Cruz or Beto O'Rourke would appeal to Texas Hispanics more?
There are plenty of Texas Republicans who would appeal to Hispanics. Ted Cruz isn't one of them.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 11:31 am to MSMHater
quote:
Is the Texas GOP running an alleged child molester?
No proof of that but he's pretty damn creepy.

Posted on 12/15/17 at 12:16 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
Really, quite interesting because I also run in Texas GOP circles and everyone I run with Loves Cruz.
I guess it depends on if you are in the conservative wing of the GOP in Texas or the Bush wing (NWO).
I guess it depends on if you are in the conservative wing of the GOP in Texas or the Bush wing (NWO).
Popular
Back to top


0




