- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
If the Left didn’t have hypocrisy, they would have nothing at all…
Posted on 1/4/26 at 2:48 pm
Posted on 1/4/26 at 2:48 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Chuck Schumer was just CAUGHT in MASSIVE hypocrisy, slamming Trump in 2020 for NOT OUSTING Maduro...
...but in 2026, ACTIVELY FIGHTING to thwart Trump's actions.
"He brags about Venezuela policy?! GIVE US A BREAK! He hasn't brought an end to the Maduro regime!"
NOW: "War Powers Act...the president couldn't do ANOTHER thing in Venezuela without Congress! We HAVE to pass this!"
"Everybody is TROUBLED and WORRIED!
Posted on 1/4/26 at 2:53 pm to Placekicker
Everybody’s coke kickback money drying up?
Posted on 1/4/26 at 2:59 pm to Placekicker
Trump is seriously outmaneuvering these critters left and right.
His four years off gave him time to come back ready for these pricks.
His four years off gave him time to come back ready for these pricks.
Posted on 1/4/26 at 3:04 pm to Placekicker
They still have pronouns, trans mutilation and boys playing in girls sports.


Posted on 1/4/26 at 3:09 pm to SallysHuman
In both videos, notice how convicted he is in his speeches.
In the first, he is absolutely condemning Trump for not ousting Maduro.
In the second, he is absolutely condemning Trump FOR ousting Maduro.
The moral of the story here is, when you’re ruled by your emotions, you’re never wrong.
You argue adamantly for one side, then, just change how you FEEL about it, and argue just as adamantly for the other side.
Is this who we want running our country? I mean, who could vote for someone who flip flops on the issues based on the way they feel at the time.
In the first, he is absolutely condemning Trump for not ousting Maduro.
In the second, he is absolutely condemning Trump FOR ousting Maduro.
The moral of the story here is, when you’re ruled by your emotions, you’re never wrong.
You argue adamantly for one side, then, just change how you FEEL about it, and argue just as adamantly for the other side.
Is this who we want running our country? I mean, who could vote for someone who flip flops on the issues based on the way they feel at the time.
This post was edited on 1/4/26 at 3:12 pm
Popular
Back to top
3







