Started By
Message

re: I love this board, but it's wrong

Posted on 3/9/20 at 3:10 pm to
Posted by geauxtigersyall
Member since Dec 2018
34 posts
Posted on 3/9/20 at 3:10 pm to
the virus didn't cross the placenta.

only one baby contracted the virus, and it was after the birth not during.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 3/9/20 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

But it is not "no worse than the flu".


Then you expect this to kill more than 20-30 thousand people in the US before the end of the year?
Posted by LSUfanNkaty
LC, Louisiana
Member since Jan 2015
11935 posts
Posted on 3/9/20 at 3:26 pm to
Just ordered in bulk

Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57897 posts
Posted on 3/9/20 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

No... no it's not. And if you can prove me wrong with factual evidence, please feel free to do so.



The R0 ("r-naught") for the flu is around 1.3, the R0 for COVID-19 is ~2.0 (on my phone so can't link but it's easy enough to find via the googlez).


***EDIT***

Back at my desk. LINK

quote:

Virus transmission

Researchers still aren't sure how contagious COVID-19 is compared to other viruses, but it appears to spread more rapidly than the flu. “In public health we measure something called the R0 (pronounced 'R-naught') which is the average number of people infected by a person with the virus,” says Dr Brown. He goes on to explain that the R0 for influenza is about 1.3, meaning about 1.3 people get the virus from every ten who have the infection. Measles, on the other hand, is extremely contagious, with an R0 of 12-18. “We are still not sure what the R0 is for coronavirus, but it appears to be about 2.0, which is about the same as SARS,” Dr. Brown continues. “These are early estimates though and are likely to change as we get better data.”


Is that sufficient?
This post was edited on 3/9/20 at 4:57 pm
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57897 posts
Posted on 3/9/20 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

Yeah... gonna need a link for that one.


LINK
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57897 posts
Posted on 3/9/20 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

Agree with most of your post, but I haven't seen anything to suggest this.


Check the posts just above this one.
Posted by HC87
Coastal NC
Member since Dec 2014
5490 posts
Posted on 3/9/20 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

ry starting with an intelligent argument, putz.


Nice try. 'timely and targeted measures' Or I guess you missed what the President and both REPS and DEMS in Congress are now weighing. Go read a book, it don't cost nothing.
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 3/9/20 at 7:38 pm to
Thanks.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57897 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 7:52 am to
quote:

Oh for fricks sake.

Can I wait for 1 confirmed case to be noted in my state before I hold up on my room?



You're in Louisiana, right?

Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62645 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 9:07 am to
quote:

the virus didn't cross the placenta.

only one baby contracted the virus, and it was after the birth not during.


Exactly. It's not a risk to pregnant women or their unborn babies.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram