- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I have a bad feeling the FISA thing, like hilldog emails, will come down to “intent”
Posted on 1/22/18 at 11:18 am to Loserman
Posted on 1/22/18 at 11:18 am to Loserman
quote:Exactly. Hillary better hope her "intent" won't be a subject of conversation in this investigation because apparently the evidence is there to show she knowingly and willingly acted recklessly with classified information. Intent is irrelevant to the law in this case, but it will likely be shown that she did have intent with what she did.
Intent was NOT required by the statute covering mishandling of classified Materials
1
Posted on 1/22/18 at 11:34 am to FooManChoo
quote:
Intent was NOT required by the statute covering mishandling of classified Materials
quote:
Exactly. Hillary better hope her "intent" won't be a subject of conversation in this investigation because apparently the evidence is there to show she knowingly and willingly acted recklessly with classified information. Intent is irrelevant to the law in this case, but it will likely be shown that she did have intent with what she did.
One of the emails recovered had her ordering the removal of classified headings and having a fax sent.
She was at a meeting and could not get a needed classified talking points because supposedly a classified fax was down.
She responded to her underlings to remove the classified heading and send it unclassified.
That is intent.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News